Roman Values In Aeneus

1354 Words3 Pages

In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus is portrayed as the Messiah, a heroic figure for the Jews, and in The Aeneid, Vergil creates Aeneas as the ideal Roman hero, a manifestation of the highest Roman virtues, such as military leadership, pride, and pietas. Although both men are depicted as heroes by their respective authors, they embody completely different sets of ideals. Aeneas, representing the Romans, would heavily disagree with Jesus because of his actions, being a servant-king instead of a ruler to his people and being captured and executed at the hands of his enemies, and because of his teachings to value the immaterial over the material. This contrast between the values represented by Aeneas and the values taught by Jesus reflect the larger conflict between Roman and Christian virtues. Aeneas displays his leadership throughout The Aeneid, proving himself a capable leader of the Trojans. His men loyally follow his orders, and he is even able to recruit foreign armies to fight under his command. His leadership is showcased when he leads the Trojans from Carthage to found Rome. “he asks them to equip the fleet in …show more content…

Vergil uses Aeneas as a symbol representing the ideal Roman values, while Mark provides an account of Jesus’ actions and teachings. Aeneas’ Roman values of military leadership, pride, and pietas are at the core of his disparity with Jesus, whose values led him to become a servant to his people and to be captured and killed by the Romans, and whose teachings of immaterialism conflicted directly with the Roman virtue of materialism. These differences clearly indicate that Aeneas would not approve of Jesus, and that he would oppose Jesus’ teachings and actions. The portrayals of Aeneas and Jesus’ actions accentuate the discrepancies between Roman values and the teachings of Jesus, clearly showing that they are not at all in tune with each

Open Document