Separate But Equal: Plessy Vs. Ferguson, Brown V. Board Of Education

Separate but Equal: Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education According to Jack M. Fletcher Separate but equal is “pertaining to a racial policy, formerly practiced in some parts of the United States, by which black people could be segregated if granted equal opportunities” (17). Separate but equal was a legalized belief in United States constitutional law that defended and allowed racial isolation as not being in violating of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which ensured equivalent protection under the law to all citizens, and other federal civil right laws. Under the policy, government was permitted to assist that facilities, offices, housing, medical care, schooling, work, and transportation

Board of Education was really the name given to five different cases that were heard by the U.S. Incomparable Court concerning the issue of isolation in government funded schools. These cases were Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Briggs v. Elliot, Davis v. Board of Education of Prince Edward County (VA.), Boiling v. Sharpe, and Gebhart v. Ethel. While the facts of every case are distinctive, the primary issue in each was the legality of state-supported segregation in public schools. In 1954, huge bits of the United States had racially segregated schools, made legal by Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which held that segregated public facilities were sacred so long as the high contrast offices were equivalent to one another. Then again, by the mid-twentieth century, civil rights groups set up lawful and political, difficulties to racial isolation. In the mid 1950s, NAACP attorneys brought legal claims in the interest of colored school children and their families in Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware, looking for court requests to force school areas to let blacks go to white public schools. One of these class activities, Brown v. Board of Education was recorded against the Topeka, Kansas’ school board by an illustrative offended party Oliver Brown, guardian of one of the kids denied access to Topeka 's white schools. Brown stated, “Topeka 's racial segregation violated the Constitution 's Equal Protection Clause because the city 's black and white schools were not equal to each other and never could be” (Carter, 56). The court rejected his case, deciding that the segregated public schools were "considerably" equal enough to be constitutional under the Plessy doctrine. Brown spoke to the Supreme Court, which merged and after that examined all the school segregations activities together. Thurgood Marshall, in 1967 who might be selected the first black equity of the Court, was boss guidance for the offended