Sandel discussed are two main objections to utilitarianism. Utilitarianism fail to respect individual rights, and it is not possible to aggregate all values and preferences using single measurements. You cannot use the monetary value to calculate human suffering or to calculate the price of human life. Also, Sandel gave interesting example of the coliseum, when Roman’s throw the Christians to lions. Christians were suffering and Romans received pleasure watching it. It shows that utilitarian approach would definitely fail to take into account the sufferings of Christians. Later Sandel introduced John Stuart Mill argues Bentham’s idea of “the greatest good for the greatest number” as it fails to take into account the individual rights. Also Mill argues that we have to make a distinguishing between higher pleasures and lower pleasures.
I personally think that the cost benefit analysis is unethical and unjust. My main concern that the idea of the greatest good for greatest number. I personally believe that human life ...
... middle of paper ...
...10) in her work “Collective interest versus individual interest in Bentham’s felicific calculus. Questioning welfarism and fairness” she wrote “ If there exists a tension between the hedonic and the ethical principles, between individual interests and the collective interest, it should be clearly enough revealed via the process of defining individual utility.”(p. 613) I also believe that people should put more interests to the individual approach.
I think that most of the people would agree with my point of view on utilitarianism and cost benefit analysis. As my own mini survey shows people of different race age and religion have similar views on this ideas.
I think in cost benefit analysis and utilitarianism there are not much compromise could be made between individual interests and community interests. Those two approaches mainly based on community interests.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- What is a good life. How does one live a good life. And what makes a life worth living. All these questions have been the topic of debate for many centuries and influence the way in which many of us live. During this keynote address, I will be looking at how applying a Utilitarian Ethical framework assists an individual in living a good life. This will be achieved through an examination of Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarian ethical theory, the bombing of Hiroshima and of how the theory links to Christian perspectives.... [tags: Ethics, Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, Morality]
1076 words (3.1 pages)
- Bentham’s utilitarian moral theory states that pleasure and pain should guide one’s moral behavior. “Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do” (Bentham). He also claims that we should not base our moral behavior on pleasure and pain, but we do anyway. The principle of utility recognizes this and it either approves or disapproves of one’s actions by having an effect on one’s happiness.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Suffering, Hedonism]
1056 words (3 pages)
- What We Ought To Do The world around us is filled with different people, animals, and different land features. Some we form personal relationships with and others remain indirect relationships. Humans are altruistic beings that have an ethical responsibility to always act in consideration of the interest of others as well as themselves. Based on an analysis of the ideas presented by Peter Singer from a utilitarian perspective, the Utilitarian Moral Theory, and Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethics; I determined that as an ethical and moral agent, I have a responsibility to care and attend to all indirect relationships such as ones involving the earth, animals, and people around me.... [tags: Ethics, Utilitarianism, Morality, Jeremy Bentham]
1234 words (3.5 pages)
- Utilitarianism is one of the most commonly used ethical theories from the time it was formulated by Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill in the nineteenth century. In his work, Utilitarianism, Bentham “sought to dispel misconceptions that morality has nothing to do with usefulness or utility or that morality is opposed to pleasure” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 53). To simplify the utilitarian principle, which is one of utility, one can surmise that morality is equated with the greatest amount of utility or good for the greatest number of people (MacKinnon, 2012).... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, Hedonism, Jeremy Bentham]
1022 words (2.9 pages)
- Jeremy Bentham was born in London on February 15, 1748, as “the son and grandson of attorneys. He lived during a time of major social, political, and economic change. The Industrial Revolution, the rise of the middle class, and revolutions in France and America reflected in Bentham’s work. In 1760 at the age of 12, Bentham, a prodigy, entered Queen’s College, Oxford. Upon completion of his undergraduate work, he went on to study law at Lincoln’s Inn. Instead of practicing law, he devoted much of life to writing on matters of legal reform” (Sweet).... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, John Stuart Mill]
718 words (2.1 pages)
- Jeremy Bentham was born on February 15, 1748 in Houndsditch, London. He was raised in a period of social, economic, and political prosperity that impacted his take on society. Being the son and grandson of attorneys, he was influenced to practice law in his family. By age 12, Bentham attended Queen’s College, Oxford, pursued law and graduated four years later. However, he soon discovered that he had a real passion for writing and on most days, he spent eight to twelve hours devoted to writing. Bentham composed an essay that criticized and ridiculed America’s take on political philosophy after the Declaration of Independence was published in 1776.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, Jeremy Bentham, Morality]
1055 words (3 pages)
- The Utilitarian theory of property looks to maximize utility for all people when property decisions are made. The common statement for the Utilitarian property theory is that in making a property the decision should do the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. The problem with this theory comes in the definition of utility and aggregating this utility in a cost-benefit analysis. A popular unit of measure of utility, using the welfarist economics utilitarian view is using an economic measure, usually the price a person is willing to pay in the marketplace to analyze decisions through a cost-benefit mechanism.... [tags: Cost-benefit analysis, Cost, Welfare economics]
1818 words (5.2 pages)
- Assess the merits of Utilitarianism (24 Marks) Utilitarianism is a theory aimed at defining one simple basis that can be applied when making any ethical decision. It is based on a human’s natural instinct to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Jeremy Bentham is widely regarded as the father of utilitarianism. He was born in 1748 into a family of lawyers and was himself, training to join the profession. During this process however, he became disillusioned by the state British law was in and set out to reform the system into a perfect one based on the ‘Greatest Happiness Principle,’ ‘the idea that pleasurable consequences are what qualify an action as being morally good’.... [tags: Ethics Morals Philosophy]
1451 words (4.1 pages)
- Why Couldn't Kant Be A Utilitarian. ABSTRACT: In his essay "Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian?", R. M. Hare tries to show that Kant's moral theory contains utilitarian elements and it can be properly asked if Kant could have been a utilitarian, though in fact he was not. I take seriously Hare's challenge to the standard view because I find his reading on the whole reasonable enough to lead to a consistent interpretation of Kant's moral philosophy. Still, I hardly believe that it is necessarily concluded from Hare's reading that Kant could have been a utilitarian.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Argumentative Papers]
3248 words (9.3 pages)
- The Atrocity of Saul Alinsky's Utilitarian Approach to Communcation Jeremy Bentham, one of the founders of Utilitarianism, believed his philosophy could provide for the “greatest happiness of the greatest number of people”. However benign it may sound, at the heart of Utilitarianism is a cold, teleological process which reduces happiness to a mere commodity. It is even worse that Saul Alinsky would extend this philosophy to a point where the truth becomes relative, justice becomes a tool of those powerful enough to wield it, and any means are justified to reach one’s desired ends.... [tags: Philosophy]
532 words (1.5 pages)