This paper will argue that strategic use of corporate social responsibility by corporation merely to make profit is wrong.
Corporate Social Responsibility also known as “CSR” is a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis (“Commission”).
Corporation ought not to use CSR solely to make profit because they violate the primary function of the CSR which is hold themselves accountable for the social, ethical and ecological impact of their business practices. Promoting social responsibility in their company’s code of ethics without holding the company’s management up to that advertisement is wrong and unethical because it misleads the stakeholders and the community’s choice of engaging in business practices with the firm and it is exploiting their vulnerability based on their interested and trust in the company’s marketing advertisements, which are false.
One could argue that these corporations’ ways of advertising for CSR is a form of puffery–the practice of making exaggerated, high fanciful or suggestive claims about the product or services (“Arrington”).
A response to this would be; puffery within defined limit is legal however, these corporations have crossed past the line puffery and have engaged in deceptive course of action, primarily by making false claims of the existence of CSR in their management practice, which is misleading. Moreover, exploiting the stakeholder vulnerability and undermine their autonomy through manipulation with false advertisement, which main purpose is to attract customers and ensure their engagement in the corporation in order to maximize profit.
The use of CSR merely to ...
... middle of paper ...
...large (“Holmes”).”
Works Cited
Alexander, J.J., & Bucholz, R.A.1978. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21: 479-486
Arrigton,Robert L. “Advertising and Behavior Control”.Journal of Business Ethics. Volum 1, 3- 12. February 1982.
Commission Green Paper 2001 “Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility”, COM(2001)366 Final
Holmes, Lord, and Richard Watts. "Corporate Social Responsibility - Making Good Business Sens." N.p., 01 Jan. 2000. Web. 16 Oct. 2013.
Lajoux, Alex. "Corporate Social Responsibility – What Is Wrong with This Picture? National Association of Corporate Directors(NACD). N.p., 10 Jan. 2011. Web. 16 Oct. 2013.
Lev, B., Petrovits, C., Radhakrishnan, S., 2006. Is doing good good for you? Yes, charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Working paper.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a when a firm goes beyond compliance and engages in “actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law” (McWilliams, Siegel & Wright, 2006)...
Corporate Social Responsibility is the obligation from corporations to utilize their resources to aid and benefit the larger society. The four components of CSR are economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. Social Responsibility is a fundamental force in the wealth creation process. If correctly demonstrated, CSR should heighten competitiveness and boost the value of wealth creation to society. A company's CSR Initiatives directly represent who the company is and what it believes it. The m...
The topic of corporate social responsibility is play a key role to run a business and has become one of the standard business practices of our time. In current, most successful companies whether big or small enterprise for instance Apple, lnc. and Krotron has engaged in CSR because it is a good way for companies to benefit themselves while it also benefiting society. And in order to obtain benefits that can give them the advantage over their competitors.
Boatright (2006) contend that corporate social responsibility denotes the responsibility recognized by a company for acting in socially responsible manner. There is no single universally accepted definition of corporate social responsibility, it has generally come to mean business decision making linked to ethical values, legal compliance, and respect for people, community, and environment. CSR accepts a company to go further than required by law so as to treat employees fairly and with respect, operate with integrity and in an ethical manner in all its business dealings with customer, suppliers, lenders, and others, respect human rights, sustain the environment for future generations and be a responsible neighbor in the community and a good ‘corporate citizen’. Hill (2009) asserts that corporate social responsibility has become a challenge which MNCs face in emerging markets. Galbreath (2009) support the view of Hill (2009) by saying that with increase in globalization, the importance of corporate social responsibility has increased a lot.
Corporate social responsibility is globally defined as operating a business in a way that meets or exceeds the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. The concern of CSR has drastically increased over the last two decades. It has enhanced interactions between governments, businesses, society and internationally. In the past, businesses primarily focus themselves with the economic results of their decisions. Now, businesses must also reflect on the legal, ethical, moral and social consequences of their decisions. Corporate Social Responsibility is no longer defined by how much money a company contributes to charity, but by its overall involvement in activities that improve the quality of people’s lives.
The role of CSR has become dramatically increased over a number of years due to an influx of social awareness by the general pubic and also by government. The demand for more ethical business processes and actions, known as ethicism, is increasing. Simultaneously, pressure is applied on industry to improve business ethics through new public initiatives and laws. The recent trend has seen an increase in the number of CSR reports being submitted from 2002 – 2005. In 2005 52% of G250 and 22% of N100 companies issued reports.[1]
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Corporate social responsibility clearly shows that it is unethical for these corporations to be making profits at the expense of the environment and other aspects of the human life. Corporate social responsibility is therefore viewed as a control mechanism to ensure that multi-corporations are responsible for their actions (Werther and Chandler
McWilliams and Siegel (2001) define CSR as, “actions that appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law.” (p. 117) Corporate social responsibility is considered both strategic, in that it yields a firm benefits, and non-strategic, in that it encompasses an observed behavior (Burke and Logsdon 1996). There is also a perception that CSR encompasses a zero-sum trade-off with the economic interests of the business. It is somewhat accepted that accepting CSR strategies will be a more long-term payoff, while entailing short-term costs, leading modern businesses to abandon it in order to appease the interests of shareholders.
...aunch independent researches in this area. However, as these schools are dependent on corporate donations, it is not very likely to happen. They draw our attention to the fact that criticizing the regulations will not do a lot but people should question the ‘possibility of transforming the dynamics to a new form of social reproduction’(Fleming). They also conclude that CSR functions as parasite because it ‘undermines the protest of stakeholders’. They offer to create more win-win situations, ‘having to alter fundamentally the nature of the corporate form and the dominance of economic rationality’. Focusing on the reduction and transformation of III. Quadrant (corporate social irresponsibility) into IV. Quadrant (enlightened self-interest). Until real efforts are made to tackle the most crucial problems engulfing the CSR practices, CSR cannot be taken seriously.
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
To understand to broad aspect of CSR, it must be considered for a complex perspective. Therefore Mureşan et al. (2010) states that CSR is the expectation related to the company leading to ecological, economical, legal, ethical and philanthropical responsibility and argues that many people do
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...