Analysis Of The Yellow Wallpaper

2124 Words5 Pages

When we don 't have a voice that is respected in society, but we want to say something, what do we do? We followed authors like Charlotte Perkins Gilman and write. She wrote the role of yellow tapestry in 1890 to eliminate the discrimination of women and the general ignorance about mental illness. On paper, we are going to see the madness of a woman because of the mistreatment of her husband and his lack of knowledge about the State of mind of women. Gilman uses entries in a journal to show us how the protagonist becomes crazy subtly and his manner of writing speak poorly of her husband, John. At first reading, the role of yellow tapestry seems silly, not more than the diary of a Madwoman. But if we analyze it and think in the historical …show more content…

This story is written in first person, and the Narrator is also the protagonist in the role of yellow wallpaper. This point of view works for this work because the Narrator writes in his diary during these three months in the House.
This immersion in the brain of a Madwoman is fine to see how she goes mad. But, we must remember that a crazy Narrator is not a reliable Narrator. She talks of a woman who is trapped in the role of your room, something that clearly that can not be real. Shmoop website sees that although she says many things, false things, they are so strange that we know the truth about them. That 's why this Narrator little reliable still serves to tell this story. This point of view and this voice of Narrator are used because they work well for this sarcastic work.
Barbara Welter mention in his article that the way of writing is a little frivolous, it has child tone, but by this weak mind thought of women are well represented. We are going with it in his madness because we read as you think this woman. Also, we feel empathy for her because we know that your rest cure does not work, that her husband does not care well into it and that there is not much she can do to not go crazy. Their situation is so tragic that we have identified with it, otherwise that the author uses to make the purpose of his

Open Document