Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
nuclear energy as an alternative power source
argument against nuclear energy
nuclear energy as an alternative power source
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: nuclear energy as an alternative power source
According to the U.S. Energy Administratin, “By 2030, electricity demand in the U.S. is expected to grow by 21% from its current level” (Candris). The population increase of the United States and other developing countries is causing a need for cleaner energy. There are many alternatives that are already in use today that show that the technology is possible. Wind, solar, hydroelectric, and natural gas are all alternatives that can provide energy in a much more efficient and clean way. However, these alternatives do not come close to the energy that can be produced by nuclear power. The past events have shown that nuclear power follows more of the necessities that other resources do not follow now. Despite monetary costs and increased health risks, nuclear power is becoming a stronger alternative energy source because there is need to reduce our footprint and a need for more baseload energy due to weak amounts of energy from wind and solar. Baseload energy is energy that is used by the general population to power homes, businesses, and other buildings. Because nuclear power produces large amounts of energy, “Nuclear plants have proven to be the low-cost source of baseload electricity” (Candris). Some sources, such as wind and solar, that are already in use supply some energy, but the energy produced is not baseload. One example of this is the sheer number of the nuclear plants in the world that have been constructed in China, Russia, India, and South Korea (Donn). All of these countries have large populations that are based in large cities. The necessity for this baseload energy was noted and nuclear was the clear alternative to solve the problem. Due to new technologies that require more energy everyday, “The world’s growing c... ... middle of paper ... ...of our planet. Works Cited Brand, Stewart. "Nuclear Power Is Safe, Sound...and Green." Earth Island Journal. Winter 2011: 48. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 27 Oct 2011. Candris, Aris. "Why the U.S. Needs Nuclear Power." Wall Street Journal. 09 Nov 2009: A19. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 27 Oct 2011. Carden, Art. "Nuclear Energy Should Be Subsidized? It Just Ain't So!." Freeman 60.5. Jun 2010: 6. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 03 Nov 2011. Donn, Jeff. "US Nuke Regulators Weaken Safety Rules." Asbury Park Press. 20 Jun 2011: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 27 Oct 2011. Hayward, Steven F. "A Fossil Fuel Renaissance? The policy fallout from Japan's nuclear woes." The Weekly Standard. 28 Mar. 2011. Gale Power Search. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. Lovins, Amory B. "Nuclear Nonsense." Earth Island Journal. Winter 2011: 49. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 03 Nov 2011.
Smil, V. (2010).Myths in the Headlines: Nuclear Power, Energy: Myths and Realities: Bringing Science to the Energy Policy Debate (pp. 150-157). Washington, D.C.: Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute.
Central Idea: Nuclear energy only contributes a small amount to the world’s electricity yet it has hazards and dangers that far out-way its benefits. There are many other alternative power producing sources that can produce energy more efficiently and more safely than nuclear power plants can.
Not only is nuclear power friendly to the environment, but it is almost always available, and many countries are starting to use it more. Renewable energy sources like solar and wind en...
Stieglitz, R & Docksai, R, 2009 ‘Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power’ The Futurist, pp. 17-22.
Nuclear power is the generation of electricity from an atomic reaction. (World Statistics: Nuclear Energy Around the World n.d.) Though it produces zero carbon emissions there has been a decline in support for nuclear power and increased its support for alternative energies in the pursuit for a fossil free energy sector. Factors that have resulted in the reduction of support for nuclear energy include nuclear accidents and waste and the positives of renewable energy which include clean energy, sustainable and reduced health and environmental risks.
Lynas, Mark, and Peter A. Bradford. "Should the World Increase Its Reliance on Nuclear Energy?" The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company, 8 Oct. 2012. Web. 16 Mar. 2014.
Nuclear power has proven before that it can result in tragedy, both seen in the accident in Chernobyl and Fukushima. However, in places such as France and even the University of Maryland, we can see the many advantages that nuclear energy can bring forth, and for different purposes. In both research and energy production, nuclear energy has proven that it can not only improve our health and the economy, but also emit less harmful gases on the environment than fossil fuels. Looking to the future, nuclear energy can easily ascend as a dominant source of electricity – if properly managed. Other sources of energy will slowly deplete and continue to damage the environment and atmosphere. Nuclear power provides a solution to so many of the current energy crisis problems, so it is only a matter of
Beckrich, Amanda. "The pros and cons of nuclear energy." The Science Teacher 80.3 (2013): 10.
Folke, L., & Burnette, H.S. (2005, March 28). Burning bright:nuclear energy's futute. Retrieved from http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba511/
Carbon, Max W. Nuclear Power: Villain or Victim?: Our Most Misunderstood Source of Electricity. Second ed. Madison, WI: Pebble Beach, 1997.
“Every dollar spent on nuclear energy is one less dollar spent on clean renewable energy and one more dollar spent on making the world a comparatively dirtier and a more dangerous place, because nuclear power and nuclear weapons go hand in hand” (Jacobson). Most countries today are becoming more and more dependent on nuclear power as a source of energy because of its high energy output and the availability of uranium used for fuelling nuclear reactors that generate power to provide electricity in households. Although using nuclear power as a source of energy has benefits like this, the danger posed by using nuclear power is too ominous.
Thesis: Nuclear power is a powerful and dangerous source of energy, but it depends on how people choice to use it.
Today, much of the world’s energy comes from the processing of fossil fuels like oil, natural gas, and coal. These fossil fuels, however, will not last forever. Fossil fuel supplies are slowly but surely dwindling in numbers and one day we will run out. We need to find different ways to generate energy. Another reason to find different ways to generate energy is that the burning and processing of fossil fuels emit NOx, SOx, CO2, and other particulate matter that is harmful to our environment and our health. Some may argue that nuclear energy power plants is the way that our society should generate energy, however, the nuclear waste it produces and the extreme dangers that exist if a plant were to blow up emitting radioactive material across a large span of area make me question its benefits. I think that society should turn to non-depletable resources such as solar energy, wind energy, geothermal energy and hydroelectric energy for our energy needs.
The use of nuclear power in the mid-1980s was not a popular idea on account of all the fears that it had presented. The public seemed to have rejected it because of the fear of radiation. The Chernobyl accident in the Soviet Union in April of 1986 reinforced the fears, and gave them an international dimension (Cohen 1). Nevertheless, the public has to come to terms that one of the major requirements for sustaining human progress is an adequate source of energy. The current largest sources of energy are the combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas. Fear of radiation may push nuclear power under the carpet but another fear of the unknown is how costly is this going to be? If we as the public have to overcome the fear of radiation and costly project, we first have to understand the details of nuclear energy. The known is a lot less scary then the unknown. If we could put away all the presumptions we have about this new energy source, then maybe we can understand that this would be a good decision for use in the near future.
Media coverage of such cases have made the public less comfortable with the idea of moving further towards nuclear power and they only opt for reducing human activities to reduce global warming. It is true that there have been some notable disasters involving nuclear power, but compared to other power systems, nuclear power has an impressive track record. First, it is less harmful and second, it will be able to cater for the growing world population. Nuclear power produces clean energy and it delivers it at a cost that is competitive in the energy market (Patterson). According to the US Energy Information Administration, there are currently 65 such plants in the Unite States (National Research Council). They produce 19 percent of the total US energy generation.