The personal choices dealing with animal testing proposes ethical issues that make people use their intuition. The preservation of life is choice. Poste says, “A hallmark of humanity is our ability to care about other species” (Poste). Poste recognizes a genuine principle that is shown throughout history. There have been animals that have almost gone extinct. Something inside of humans recognized this and observed preservation as a necessity. The care inside human’s hearts is what prevented the nearly-extinct animals to continue living. The same care should carry over again for defenseless creatures that are being continuously researched on. McCarthy states, “Nobody seemed happy” (McCarthy 636). McCarthy also identifies a problem when in her essay; she discloses information of the first grout to finish their lab on animal research, namely dogs. The disdain that McCarthy saw in her fellow colleagues leads the reader to see that something inside them felt bad. Furthermore, the human desire is to protect lives, not execute them. That feeling of hurt or the need to take care of something reiterates the preservation of life that is inside everyone. Evidenced by the researchers’ compassion, humans’ feelings towards animals are very personal. In the article, “An Ethical Argument Against Vivisection”, “Animals are seen simply as resources – as little more than products to make our lives more convenient ...
... middle of paper ...
... we are morally obligated to protect infants, the developmentally disabled, and the mentally ill” (“An Ethical Argument Against Vivisection”). Humans have to realize that the choice is in their hands. Animal testing is wrong and people must stand up for animals because no one else can.
"ANIMALS IN SCIENCE." An Ethical Argument Against Vivisection. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2013.
"ANIMALS IN SCIENCE." Animals in Science. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2013.
"ANIMALS IN SCIENCE." Framing the Scientific Argument. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 Dec. 2013.
McCarthy, Claire, “Dog Lab,” from Learning How the Heart Beats. Copyright © 1995 by Claire
McCarthy. Used by permission of Viking Penguin, a division of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.
Poste, George. “Animal testing a necessary research tool, for now.” The Arizona Republic.
Azcentral.com, 3 Sept. 2006. Print 31 May, 2012.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- How will animal research tell us the outcomes of the human body. How can we live longer and healthier lives with the use of animals. Do animals have a link to the human body that we are able to prove that trying new drugs or new cosmetics will be a benefit for us. I disagree. I believe we test on animals to figure out what are the possible outcomes for humans; however, the use of animals is cruel and unnecessary because they do not have a similar body system as humans do. We use at least a millions animals such as: mice, rats, rabbits, primates and even household pets like cats and dogs (Animal Testing 101).... [tags: animal testing, smallpox]
1419 words (4.1 pages)
- Both in and out of philosophical circle, animals have traditionally been seen as significantly different from, and inferior to, humans because they lacked a certain intangible quality – reason, moral agency, or consciousness – that made them moral agents. Recently however, society has patently begun to move beyond this strong anthropocentric notion and has begun to reach for a more adequate set of moral categories for guiding, assessing and constraining our treatment of other animals. As a growing proportion of the populations in western countries adopts the general position of animal liberation, more and more philosophers are beginning to agree that sentient creatures are of a direct moral... [tags: Animal Rights ]
1849 words (5.3 pages)
- Animal Testing in Scientific Research Animal testing has been going on since the late nineteenth century. Over the years, billions of animals have been killed from experiments, but the amount of animals tested on has fallen 50% since 1968 and in 1998 reached a 40 year low of only 2.66 million procedures. With that much of a decline, I can’t imagine how many animals were once used and for what purposes. Even with the 50% decline, the number of animals sacrificed for medical and biomedical ends in the United States each year is unknown, but certainly exceeds 60 million and may possibly be as high as 100 million.... [tags: Animal Testing]
823 words (2.4 pages)
- Animal Experimentation has been around for centuries. In fact, animal testing dates back to the days of Aristotle. During these times, scientists would dissect animals to test surgical procedures before using these procedures on humans, which is similar to what we do now. Today, vivisection, the use of animals for scientific purposes, helps and hinders medical research and development. Therefore, there are many pros and cons to animals testing for scientific research. So far animal testing has resulted in the increase of countless human and animal lives and life expectancies around the world.... [tags: Animal Experimentation, History, Polio, Rubella]
943 words (2.7 pages)
- Animal research, or animal testing, is the use of animals in scientific researches to study and develop drugs for the life-taking diseases that human beings contract. It has been practiced for hundreds of years. Animal testing helps produced many vaccines and other drugs, like penicillin, and thus, save many human lives. On the other hand, animal testing also causes pain and kills a lot of animals used during the researches that many people oppose this practice. Supporters show their support, while opponents show their oppositions toward this controversial issue that is still in debates today.... [tags: Biology Medical Biomedical Animal Testing]
1403 words (4 pages)
- The Morality of Animal Testing in Scientific Research Animal testing is not a new thing. For many centuries scientists and testers in research have used animals of all kinds. Most of the animals are small ones like rodents - rats, mice, hamsters and gerbils. Some dogs, cats and a variety of goats, monkeys and rabbits have also been used. The animal rights issue is an emotional one. For decades the value of animal research has been grossly overrated. Although researchers claim that they depend on animal test data to achieve medical advances, we should demand other means of research and there should be laws assuring a minimum level of animal protection because testing on animals is cruel, inh... [tags: Animal Testing]
1290 words (3.7 pages)
- For many years, scientists have conducted research to test drugs and other commodities before sending them to human trials and to the market. Often times, these drugs are analyzed by animal testing, which is the “use of [non-human] animals in experiments and development projects usually to determine toxicity, dosing, and efficacy of test drugs before proceeding to human clinical trials” (American Anti-Vivisection Society [AAVS]). These experiments often include inhumane, abusive treatment to animals.... [tags: drugs, human trials, treatment]
2238 words (6.4 pages)
- An intense and polarizing deliberation concerning the issue of animal experimentation and the utilization in research has been raging for years. This issue often catches newspaper headlines and strikes the heart of the American public. The opinion of advocates of animal research and the opinion of those who oppose it are quite visible in the media. Both sides tirelessly strive in advancing their unique beliefs. So far as this discussion is specifically focused on the attainment of favorable legislation by one side or the other, special interest groups have been formed by both parties in order to sway the legislators and numerous bureaucrats to their desired side.... [tags: Animal Rights]
2177 words (6.2 pages)
- Should Animals Be Used for Scientific Research There is always a special relationship between humans and animals, and some people will consider and treat their home animals as a part of their family members. In the recent decade, the animal experimentation plays a very significant role for biomedical research. Those animal experimentation allows scientists to do medical research on animals to develop new drugs for saving human life and preventing human suffering from diseases, and it also helps to ensure the safety of the drugs.... [tags: scientists, drugs, labs]
658 words (1.9 pages)
- Imagine a life locked away in a cage with no form of control on your existence. It’s cold, dark, and you are scared. You don’t have a choice of what you eat, where you live, or how you are treated. You are unsure if it is day or night or what will happen to you next. You are locked away in a prison cell and you committed no crime. This is the life of a laboratory animal. Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific research purposes and experiments. It can be used for the findings of cures and medicines to testing new drugs, to understanding the behavioral psychology of the animals themselves.... [tags: Animal Rights]
1612 words (4.6 pages)