The use of animals in research is a heavily debated topic, and there are two differing factions with vastly different views on if animals should be used in medical research. The Experimentalist claims that society cannot allow humans to suffer, and if that means that in order to prevent human suffering animals have to, then that is what must be done. The use of animals for research methods is considered to be a necessary evil to better human health “ there is no satisfactory alternative, the use of animals is essential to human health” (Munro). The flip side of that is the Antivivisectionists who claim that animal pain is inhumane and not worth the benefit it can provide to human health. The Antivivisectionist belief that “the researcher’s case is deeply flawed and that the availability of cruelty-free alternatives renders animal experimentation morally reprehensible” (Munro). While reading this paper, you can decide which faction you follow.
Every year there are millions of animals experimented on all over the world...
... middle of paper ...
...ecause they are a reliable source for testing medicines and other products for toxicity” (Dixon). The animals tested on normally do not receive relief from the pain. “Not adequately anaesthetised and are abused by handlers and experimenter” (Dixon). Researchers are allowed to perform experiments that cause unrelieved pain and distress to animals ("Biomedical Research"). They can claim that providing relief would interfere with the scientific goals of their experiment ("Biomedical Research"). The animals used for vivisection are forced to live with harsh treatment and tests every day. “Animals are maimed, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and otherwise hurt and killed in the name of science” (Animal Testing Facts). “It is estimated that 274,000 animals die per day, or three animals every second worldwide” (" Animal Testing and Science-").
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Physicians are known to have performed vivisection on animals for hundreds of years, and nowadays animal testing remains an essential element of research in medicine and pharmacology. Animal experimentation has generated heated discussions among scientists, philosophers, and politicians. This issue is very controversial, since it involves ethical questions. While it is generally accepted that testing cosmetics on animals is unnecessary and immoral, there is a debate concerning the use of animals for medical purposes.... [tags: Should animal testing be allowed?]
1935 words (5.5 pages)
- Many companies around the world test Cosmetic and medicinal related products to make sure it is safe for human consumption. Most branded cosmetic or medicinal companies have testing labs working every day. Animals are very similar to humans biologically, and are accepted in many households as pets. However companies have tested products on animals for many years. Medicines like insulin were discovered directly from the experimentation on dogs. Although testing on animals has helped humanity by providing medicines, the cosmetic testing is unneeded, and with alternatives available for both medicinal and cosmetic testing the testing on animals must stop.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
711 words (2 pages)
- Animal testing is something that has occurred for many decades. Many believe that humans are treated superior to animals. This is known as "speciesism" (Garner). Even though using animals for testing can be needed in the medical world, the use of testing on animals is unethical and should be treated differently. The Animal Rights Act along with other movements have made great strides over the years to prove that there are many other options than testing on animals. While many scientists have changed their experiments from animals to in vitro, many still decide to use animals (Howard).... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1316 words (3.8 pages)
- “Scientists in the US use approximately 12-25 million animals in research.” (US Statists). Hundreds of thousands of animals are subjected to experimentation every year that could even be failure. These experiments are meant to benefit humans without the consideration of what happens to the animals. Many of these animals are be subject to meaningless harm or even deaths; however there is hope, “Advances in science have led to a new vision for toxicity testing based on human cell systems that will be more predictive, have higher throughput, cost less money, and be more comparable to real-life exposures in humans, while using many fewer animals.”( Zurlo).... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Medical research]
1719 words (4.9 pages)
- Since ancient times, animals have been the subjects of medical and safety testing. But only relatively recently has discontent been expressed by large numbers of people. Referred to as animal rights activists, this displeasured community condemns all animal use in medical, product testing, and research experiments despite the beneficiary outcomes because they firmly believe that interfering with another living creature’s life is immorally and ethically wrong. One individual who sides with the activists is named Jamie Aronson.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing]
1397 words (4 pages)
- Abstract: For centuries, the use of animal experimentation in the biomedical field has been questioned ethically. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain that the animals endure. Animal rights activist will argue that there are new alternatives that are more accurate than animal testing. Also, even though there is an Animal Welfare Act (AWA), there is still little protection for animals. Nonetheless, scientists will continue to use animals for the advancement in the medical field because there have been various cases where animals have paved the way, medically, for humans to this day.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1231 words (3.5 pages)
- For centuries, the use of animal experimentation in the biomedical field has been questioned ethically. Do the benefits of animals used in research outweigh the pain that the animals endure. Animal rights activists will argue that there are new alternatives that are more accurate than animal testing. Nonetheless, scientists will continue to use animals for the advancement in the medical field because there have been various cases where animals have paved the way, medically, for humans to this day.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- Animal Testing in the Medical Field Archaic or Necessary Practice. Animal testing has been prevalent in the medical field for almost the entire existence of the medical field. Animals have been used to do everything from developing surgical procedures to vaccines; it has led to huge leaps and bound in the medical research field. However there has been a lot of controversy lately about whether or not animal testing is still relevant in today’s world. Many drugs that have not gone through animal testing have led to human deaths or disfigurements that have a count in the thousands.... [tags: Animal testing, Medical research, Pharmacology]
1604 words (4.6 pages)
- The use of animals in research has created a diverse range of attitudes, as some individuals support the use of animal testing and others are against it. Sometimes people do not have enough background knowledge on this topic to be involved in a discussion. Animal testing dates back to around 400 years ago, when one of the first famous researchers William Harvey was curious to discover how blood circulates around the body. The modern era of animal testing began around 150 years ago, although the conditions were quite different; the animals suffered severely as there were no anesthetics (Understanding Animal Research 2013).... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Medical research]
1289 words (3.7 pages)
- Throughout human history, there is no question that animal testing has made a huge impact on biomedical research and the discovery of various cures and diseases. Because the opposition insists that animal testing is still necessary, the issue is a very controversial one and has attracted a lot of debate recently. Despite the fact, it is absurd to sacrifice thousands of animals every year when there better alternatives for biomedical research currently in North American society. With this in mind, Animal testing should be abolished because it is no longer ethical, animal models are not as accurate as human models, and because there are better alternatives.... [tags: Animal testing, Medical research, Animal rights]
1135 words (3.2 pages)
- Teaching As A Profession Teacher
- Effects Of Alcohol Abuse On The Body
- Are Americans Really Favor Of Interracial Marriage?
- Gender And Gender Roles Within The Workplace Within Family, Education, Peer Groups, And Mass Media
- The Impact Of Three Strikes Laws On The Criminal Justice System
- Bilingual Education : Why It Is Necessary