US-Latin America

1387 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Impacts of imperialism in South America

During the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, the United States was the most dominant power in the Western Hemisphere. European nations conceded to the United States their right of any intervention in the Western Hemisphere and allowed the United States to do whatever they wanted. The United States took this newly bestowed power and abused it. The United States intervened in many Latin American countries and imposed their policies on to these countries against their will. A perfect example of this aggression is what occurred in the Dominican Republic in 1904. The United States intervened in this sovereign nation and took control of their economy and custom houses. A memorandum from Francis B. Loomis, the United States Assistant Secretary of State, to the Secretary of States illustrates the United States’ goals, interests, attitudes and assumptions in the Dominican Republic and how the United States policy makers felt towards Latin America during this time period. The United States had a wide variety of goals and interests in the Dominican Republic and in Latin America. In the Dominican Republic, Americans were heavily invested in the Dominicans’ industries. Americans invested in an area of six million dollars just in the Sugar industry alone (Loomis 2). And “the total American investments in the Dominican Republic of an important and active sort are estimated to be worth about twenty million dollars (Loomis 2). Also, many American citizens owned and operated many vast and major plantations and railroads in the Dominican Republic. American citizens’ owned and operated 60 miles of important line of railway (Loomis 3). Also at Sosua, the American company, United Fruit Company owned some twenty thousand acres of land which... ... middle of paper ... ...l power in Latin American. The United States didn’t engage in classic direct imperialism which is colonialism, but engage in indirect imperialism which focused on controlling and intervening in the economic and social institutions of Latin America. The United States only cared for their economic well-being. They didn’t care the suffering the people of Latin America were going through. The United States only cared that their economic interests were thriving in Latin America. The policies the United States government undertook clearly show this. The policies of Roosevelt’s corollary and Taft’s dollar diplomacy only mention the United States’ interests. There is nothing about the Latin American’s interests and well-being. Many people suffered because of the United States’ policy that only supported and protected the rich and powerful corporations.

Show More
Related

  • DBQ 4

    551 Words  | 2 Pages

    Economic self-interest was more effective in driving American foreign policy because the U.S wanted to protect their property. As described in War and other Essays The U.S needed to choose not to be rulers and to let Filipinos and Spanish Americans live their own lives without ...

    Read More

  • Thomas G. Patterson's Contesting Castro: The United States and the Triumph of the Cuban

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    Economically, Cubans “enjoyed one of the one of the highest standards of living in Latin America” (34). This is predominately due to the fact that Cuba exported half its sugar and two-thirds of it total exports into the U.S., and imported three-fourths of their total imports from the U.S. Although the U.S. (35). Although the U.S. boosted the Cuban economy, Cubans resented that they were still living at an economic level lower than Americans. The average Cuban income was one- third the average of Mississippi, the poorest state in the U.S. in th...

    Read More

  • The New White Man's Burden

    1547 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the course of history, nations have invested time and manpower into the colonizing and modernizing of more rural governments. Imperialism has spread across the globe, from the British East India Company to France’s occupation of Northern Africa. After their founding in 1776, the United States of America largely stayed out of this trend until The Spanish-American War of 1898. Following the war, the annexation and colonization of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines ultimately set a precedent for a foreign policy of U.S. imperialism.

    Read More

  • test I

    1446 Words  | 3 Pages

    Section I,2. Analyze the consequences of American rule in Puerto Rico, Cuba and the Philippines. Did the citizens prosper? Enjoy freedom? Accept American rule? Comment on the consequences for the United States with regard to the statement made by Eric Foner in the text, “Thus, two principles central to American freedom since the War of Independence – no taxation without representation and government based on the consent of the governed – were abandoned when it came to the nation’s new possessions.

    Read More

  • Dominican Republic Vs Haiti

    1520 Words  | 4 Pages

    Today I bring to your forefront of thought, the island of Hispaniola. This island is the namesake for the two countries who run the land, the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Both nations hail from a joint introduction into the world market and post-European colonization, but as time progressed, each one had a different outlook to the world stage. The present day Dominican Republic and Haiti are worlds apart on an island which keeps them together. Their culture is separated by the colonial residuals that lay imbedded into their communities. They are on different sides of the spectrum of structural growth due to the resulting outcomes from decades of political ruling and policy making. On one side we have the second independent state of the Americas,

    Read More

  • The American Imperialism

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    Economics becomes a large factor in the American imperialism; but more specifically that expansion in foreign markets is a vital part in the growth of America. As historian Charles Beard puts it, “[it] is indispensable to the prosperity of American business. Modern diplomacy is commercial. Its chief concern is with the promotion of economic interests abroad” (Kinzer 81). Williams provides that the people of United States wanted this change to culminate in the business. “A great many farm businessmen were in trouble, and if they voted together they could control national policy. There was, in truth, a crisis before the Cri...

    Read More

  • Theodore Roosevelt: Myopic Hero

    666 Words  | 2 Pages

    Free-market ideologues had to disregard his domestic policy implementations, where to a certain extent he validated the concerns of commonwealth against wealth, conserved wilderness from predatory developers and withdrew Washington from the bondage of Wall Street. However, Roosevelt’s foreign policy faultlessly corresponded with the conservative agenda. Obliged by myopic imperial enthusiasm and a lust for action, he subverted the diplomatic environment with militaristic rapidity throughout his career, from his advocacy of war with Spain in 1898 and American intervention in World War I and his critical appraisal of Woodrow Wilson’s peaceable agenda at the Paris Peace Conference. Perhaps the most fundamental example of Roosevelt’s imperialist foreign policy was his establishment of the Roosevelt Corollary, prompted by the Venezuelan Crisis of 1902-03 and the construction of the Panama Canal. The corollary fostered a strategic American asset, and culpability by extension, in the Western Hemisphere, thus, warranting Roosevelt to legitimize America’s hegemony in the region.

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy Essay

    1319 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the first foreign policies in the twentieth century was the Roosevelt Corollary. This policy asserted U.S. authority to intervene in the affairs of Latin American nations; an expansion of the Monroe Doctrine. Also known as the cornerstone of American foreign policy, the Monroe Doctrine was the first time the United States had declared their own foreign policy without following the foreign policies of other countries. The doctrine declared that we (the United States) “are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European power” (Out of Many Pg. 765), meaning the Western Hemisphere was to be closed off to further European colonization and that the U.S. would not interfere in the internal affair of European nations. The Roosevelt Corollary, however, was an amendment stating that the United States of America was the superior culture, and Roosevelt wanted to spread value and influence in Latin America and keep the Europeans out. President Roosevelt was very fond of the West African proverb, “Speak softly and carry a big stick, you will go far.” Throughout his presidency and the Roosevelt Corollary, the president used the “big st...

    Read More

  • The Spanish-American War

    1517 Words  | 4 Pages

    THESIS : “ The United States didn’t want to get involved in the Spanish-American War, but was dragged into it due to yellow journalism, they wanted to control the seas, and wanted complete control over Cuba.”

    Read More

  • Chilean Democracy Pros And Cons Research Paper

    694 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the coup, the United States had already invested heavily in Chilean democracy, starting with the Alliance for Progress initiated by John F. Kennedy in 1961, aimed at establishing economic cooperation between the U.S and Latin America. On pg. 12 of the introduction Kornbluh discusses how Chile had long been a country that attracted a case

    Read More

  • Good Neighbor Policy

    599 Words  | 2 Pages

    Roosevelt made the decision to formalize a policy started by Herbert Hoover by which the United Sates rejected the right to intervene militarily in the internal affairs of Latin American countries (Foner 853). Moreover, this Good Neighbor Policy, had mixed results. The United States withdrew its troops from Haiti and Nicaragua during the 1930s (Foner 853). What is more, Roosevelt accepted Cuba’s repeal of the Platt Amendment, which permitted American military interventions on that island. These steps offered an overdue recognition of the sovereignty of American neighbors (Foner 853). On the other hand, while Roosevelt criticized wealthy businessmen at home, like previous presidents he was left feeling uncomfortable and dealing with undemocratic governments friendly to American business interests abroad (Foner 853). Equally important, the United States extended support to dictators with the likes of Anastasio Somoza in Nicaragua, Rafael Trujillo Molina in the Dominican Republic, and Fulgencio Batista in Cuba (Foner 853). However, in the 1930s the international crisis deepened, the Roosevelt administration had taken steps to counter German influence in Latin

    Read More

  • Describe the Causes and Discuss the Effects of the Cuban Revolution.

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    However the US played a much larger role in Cuba’s past and present than the building of casinos and the introduction of the first taints of corruption. In the past, even before Batista, Americans were resented by Cubans because the Americans made a lot of Cuba’s decisions. Under Batista, 80% of Cuban imports came from the US, and the US controlled at least 50% of sugar, utilities, phones and railroads. If Cuba was a business in the stock markets, then the US would have been close to owning 50% of its shares. When combined with a long history of US-backe...

    Read More

  • European Influence In Latin America

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    A) During the late 19th century Latin America had just begun entering the race to industrialization. Currently winning that race was the United States of America and Europe. Latin America was still evolving, they were culturally and economically oriented toward the outside world, highly accessible of European influence, especially from France and England. In Latin America both conservatives and liberals regarded the United States worthy of imitation. Together, the United States, England, and France began to define Latin America's growing relationship with the outside world.

    Read More

  • The Spanish American War

    1243 Words  | 3 Pages

    This commanding attitude taken by the United States government spread into the American people as well, with corporate giants such as Rockefeller and Morgan, who controlled large parts of American business with monopolies over the railroads and oil industry. Events such as the SpanishAmerican War and interference in the Philippines marked the indisputable beginning of American imperialism. Invasions such as these propelled United States capitalist expansion and produced the ideas of economic expansion in government as well as in homes. The Philippines played a larger part in the Spanish-American War than most may like to believe. The Philippine-American War, as it could be called, is forgotten by most everyone in all of United States Military history.

    Read More

  • Of Liberalism In Emily Rosenberg's Spreading The American Dream?

    1588 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Emily Rosenberg's book Spreading The American Dream: American Economic and Cultural Expansion, she chronicles the history of American expansionism throughout the Western Hemisphere, Europe, and the Far East. I contend that not only does the United States disregard their path towards liberalism when it suits their interests, but also that the United States' intervention in Latin America was meant to undercut European competition while boosting their own economic supremacy throughout the world. The conflicts between global economic expansion and classic liberalism presented themselves beginning with McKinley's presidency, evolving but still conflicting all the way through the Truman administration. With an increased government role in foreign

    Read More

More about US-Latin America

Open Document