Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the portrayal of women in literature
the portrayal of women in literature
gender in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the portrayal of women in literature
With both author’s realistic description and depiction of two dysfunctional families, Ibsen and Strindberg really both push the envelope on how realistic they may seem. They are not afraid to portray families how the truly are, many times ugly and unseemly. In Ghosts everyone’s roles as mom, dad, son, and daughter is abandoned and narrate to each other as normal human beings, but especially those of mothers. In Strindberg’s The father there is no denying that the conception of a feminist household exist. Laura is clearly in look for power, but her exclusion from the self-given power of the Captain drives her to use her daughter for maternal rule. In addition, Ghosts paints a brilliant picture in helping convey the state that this family is in. We should really begin in talking about the plague, the man compared to the devil, Engstrand. As we read the play we come to understand that Engstrand is not the legitimate father of Regina, and there seems to be evidence that she knows it, too. The notion of family is one of the social crutches that Engstrand tries to manipulate to his own ways (he does the same with religion). “What the devil do you mean? Do you set yourself up against your father, you hussy? (I.12) Engstrand clearly seems paranoid in his tone of voice and internally knows the truth about Regina’s situation. There is one idea that is part of the “ghosts” that Mrs. Alving speaks of: MRS.ALVING. Ah, but here he has his mother, you see. My own darling boy-he hasn’t forgotten his old mother! MANDERS. It would be grievous indeed, if absence and absorption in art that sort of things were to blunt his natural feelings (I.24) This theory of filial respect is one of the “ghosts” Helene clings to until the very last dramati... ... middle of paper ... ...art f all evil in society, a place where woman can be sensual man can to anchors and a prison for children (60). As we have exhausted, these families are unfamiliar but yet real. Their mothers play a vital role in the present and future of both plays. Both plays support this theme of families and their dysfunctional way of being and their unparallel patterns oppose to those of the normal, traditional standards. Works Cited Carlson, Harry G. Introduction. Strindberg: Five Plays. Trans. Carlson. Berkeley: U of Cal P, 1983. 1-13. Print. Ibsen, Henrik. Ghosts in Ibsen: Four Major Plays: Ghosts, An Enemy of the People, The Lady from the Sea, and John Gabriel Borkman, Vol. 2. Trans. Rolf Fjelde. New York: Penguin, 2001. 1-81. Print. Strindberg, August. The Father in Strindberg: Five Plays. Trans. Harry G. Carlson. Berkeley: U of Cal P, 1983. 19-62. Print.
In Like Water for Chocolate and A Doll’s House, many of the central characters to the story are bound together by family ties. Creon is the father to Haemon, while Mama Elena is the mother of Tita. These connections between characters aid in developing many of the core themes of the story, and convey the author’s ideas on common controversial topics of the time, namely feminism and the power struggle. The various interconnected family relationships in both books are the focal point of the plot in many occasions, and creates tension in the storyline. However, the family relationships in Like Water for Chocolate and Antigone are also different in many ways. The difference in family relationships and its effect on plot and central themes will be discussed.
Updike, John. “A&P” Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Ed X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 4th ed. New York: Longman, 2005. 15-21.
Saari, Sandra. In James McFarlane (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen. Cambridge University Press. 1994
A man, intoxicated and impoverished, lay on the dirty streets of patriarchal Norway, and as the jeering citizens sauntered by, they could have never guessed that this man, Henrik Ibsen, would be the Prometheus of women’s rights and the creator of the modern play. Having been born in 1828, Ibsen lived through various examples of the subjection of women within the law, such as Great Britain allowing men to lock up and beat their wives “in moderation” (Bray 33). Therefore, Ibsen was known for his realistic style of writing within both poetry and plays, which usually dealt with everyday situations and people (31). Focusing on the rights of women, Ibsen’s trademark was “...looking at these problems without the distortions of romanticism” and often receiving harsh criticism for doing so (31). In an attempt to support his family, Ibsen became a pharmaceutical apprentice, but after three years he abandoned this profession and began writing poetry. After an apprenticeship in the theater, he began writing his own plays, including a drama in verse, Peer Gynt (31). While working and writing in Norway, Ibsen and several social critics observed “...the penalty society pays when only half of its members participate fully as citizens”, deciding to flee Norway in hopes of finding a more accepting social environment (33). Ibsen wrote A Doll’s House, his most famous work about women suffering through the oppressive patriarchal society, while living primarily in Germany and Italy where he “...was exposed to these social norms and tensions to a much greater extent than he would have been had he remained solely in Norway” (32). While Sweden, Norway, and Denmark began to grant legal majority to women, Ibsen understood the legal improvements f...
The theme that has been attached to this story is directly relevant to it as depicted by the anonymous letters which the main character is busy writing secretly based on gossip and distributing them to the different houses. Considering that people have an impression of her being a good woman who is quiet and peaceful, it becomes completely unbecoming that she instead engages in very abnormal behavior. What makes it even more terrible is the fact that she uses gossip as the premise for her to propagate her hate messages not only in a single household but across the many different households in the estate where she stays.
The plays, The Glass Menagerie and A Raisin in the Sun, deal with the love, honor, and respect of family. In The Glass Menagerie, Amanda, the caring but overbearing and over protective mother, wants to be taken care of, but in A Raisin in the Sun, Mama, as she is known, is the overseer of the family. The prospective of the plays identify that we have family members, like Amanda, as overprotective, or like Mama, as overseers. I am going to give a contrast of the mothers in the plays.
Strindberg, August. "Preface to Miss Julie". Michael Meyer trans., 1888. Rpt. in Strindberg Plays: One. Michael Meyer trans.
Havel, Vaclav. The Memorandum in The Garden Party and Other Plays. Trans. Vera Blackwell. New York: Grove Press, 1993.
Henrik Ibsen's works Dollhouse and An Enemy of the People can be shown to have both been written by Ibsen not only through characteristic technique such as blocking and character exposition, but also the similarity in the decay of the social persona of characters from the norm and the main character's heightening stalwart. The later of that statement proves the works to be Ibsen's writing more effectively because such a commonality is a more direct link between works than such subtlies as character exposition.
Gainor, J. Ellen., Stanton B. Garner, and Martin Puchner. The Norton Anthology of Drama, Shorter Edition. New York: W. W. Norton &, 2010. Print.
“A thousand words will not so deep an impression as one deed.” Discuss in relation to the first two acts of Ibsen’s ‘Ghosts’
...or them. She then asks him “will you leave me alone now?” (Line 179), meaning that he now has found the other ghosts. And therefore doesn’t need the company of the living anymore. The protagonist doesn’t need to hold on to his memory, because she knows he is safe and in good hands with the rest of the family. First when she knows her father is safe, she can get closure, and not only let go of him, but the entire family. The story ends with her saying: “I’ll se you then” (line 185) and her father replying: “you know where we are” (line 186), as if he reassures her that she will rejoin them when she dies.
Henrik Ibsen catches the world off guard with his play A Doll House. The world is in what is known as the Victorian era and women and men have specific roles. The way the story unravels takes the reader by surprise. Ibsen wanted to write a play that would challenge the social norms and that would show the world that no matter how hard they press, they would not always win. Ibsen uses society’s customs, deception, and symbolism to keep the reader on their feet and bring them a play that they would never forget.
In order to explore the theme of feminism in Henrik Ibsen’s play, A Doll’s House, the following must be considered: the roles men and women are expected to have, what feminism is, the different ways that feminism can be shown in the play, and finally how feminism effects marriage. The roles that men and women are expected to have is a major contributor to the different ways that feminism is shown in the play, as well as how feminism effects marriage. Therefore, there must be a clear understanding as to what these expectations are so that the effects of following or rejecting these roles can be seen. In addition, there has to be knowledge of how following or rejecting these roles influences feminism in this play. Another thing that must be understood in order for there to be a clear viewpoint on what is being analyzed in Ibsen's work is what feminism is.
Ibsen, Henrik. "A Doll House." Ibsen : Four Major Plays - Volume 1. Trans. Rolf Fjelde. New York: Signet Classics, 1992. 43-114. Print.