Unjustifiable Means of Modernizing Russia

743 Words2 Pages

Unjustifiable Means of Modernizing Russia Joseph Stalin was a dictator who single handedly revamped Russia, turning it from a backward country to a superpower at the cost of millions of lives. While his collectivization policy and Five-Year Plan and were effective in increasing the productivity and political power of Soviet Russia, less draconian, less Machiavellian, measures could have been implemented to ensure a similar, if not identical economical result. Stalin viewed the kulaks as an obstacle, an unnecessary, even detrimental, class, toward modernization. In an account published in The Land of Soviets, they were depicted as saboteurs of socialism, arsonists, and murderers (7). However, since this document was allowed to be published in the USSR, it is clear that the author is trying to blame the process of dekulakization on the kulaks themselves. Stalin didn’t want people to question his elimination of the kulaks as a class, so he dismisses any protest by declaring that it is unreasonable to argue over his decree, and that the kulaks, a class founded on capitalism, is not suitable in a communistic country (4, B4). His propaganda poster probably greatly influenced young Stalinists like Lev Kopelev, who partook in the collectivization drive, but later became ashamed of taking part (10, B2). A possible alternative would be to turn the kulaks into cash cows, and impose strict taxes to fill Russia’s treasury. It was already proven by Lenin and the NEP that people are more productive when they are free to do as they please. In this way, more food could be produced, and thousands of lives would have been spared. His true intention for the destruction of the kulaks was to obtain more land and people to work the government owned ... ... middle of paper ... ...hip of the USSR. What worked in Japan during the Meiji Restoration, i.e. nationalism, could not have worked in Russia because of its sheer size and ethnic diversity. Perhaps the one thing that Stalin would have been forced to utilize if he was to remain in power was the purges. However, the extent of the purges caused it to be counter productive at best. Many of the accused at the “trials” were declared guilty with little or no evidence, or false evidence produced under torture (9). It would have been helpful if we had a document of Stalin’s reasoning of the purges to see if his views are consistent with our postulate. Stalin’s policies were overtly harsh and largely unnecessary. Most of what he has done by brute force could have been achieved by more peaceful approaches. Millions of lives might have been spared if he was ever thoughtful enough to save them.

Open Document