Why Is Leonardo Da Vinci The Universal Man

1168 Words3 Pages

Leonardo Da Vinci
The Universal Man Leonardo Da Vinci is one of the most famous artists of the High Renaissance, and perhaps of all time. Unlike the others of his time, however, he was more than just an artist. He was a scientist, and inventor, and arguably one of the most brilliant men to have ever lived. Many of his scientific achievements set him three-hundred years ahead of the medical professionals of his time (Squeri). He spent much of his life trying to expand his knowledge of the natural world, as well as how man perceives it. Leonardo’s passion for both science and art drove him to attempt to unite the two fields, because he strongly believed that “art without science is not art at all” (De Girolami Cheney). His studies of vision …show more content…

He dedicated countless hours of research to studying ocular science before he concluded that “he could not depict correctly on canvas everything he saw with two eyes” (Wade, et al.). His studies of vision (Fig. 2) show the differences between a binocular view and a monocular view of an object. He found that a painting can only show a monocular view of the object, because when viewing an object with one eye, part of the background will not be visible; however, when viewing an object with two eyes, the viewer is able to see everything behind the object, because eye ‘s’ sees space ‘m x’ while eye ‘r’ sees space ‘x n’. In painting, this cannot be possible, because the painted object covers everything behind it. His findings were that “it is impossible for a painting even though executed with the greatest perfection of outline, shadow, light, and color to seem in the same relief as the natural model, unless that natural model is looked at from a great distance with one eye.” (Wade, et al.). These findings led him to abandon linear perspective in pursuit of atmospheric …show more content…

This can be seen in his previously mentioned works as the triangular or pyramidal shape in Christ’s pose in The Last Supper, or the pose of the woman in Mona Lisa, giving the composition a sense of stability through his use of such a stable structure; however, he also used geometric forms for other, subtler, purposes as well. In one of his earlier works, Annunciation (Fig. 5), he uses rectangular forms to portray two different realms of nature (seen in Fig. 6). The natural realm is seen in the background, where he demonstrates atmospheric perspective of the spring trees, and the distant mountain ranges. The divine realm is displayed in the foreground with the Angel kneeling in the flower garden. He unites the divine realm with the Virgin Mary using a square shape that overlaps with the rectangular form of the divine realm. The flowers within the garden also relate to the Virgin Mary’s innocence as well as her love and mourning, further uniting the two realms. The union of the square shape containing the Virgin Mary and the rectangular shape of the divine realm forms a Tao Cross, the religious Christian symbol referring to Christ’s crucifixion, at the lectern, which symbolizes the birth and death of Christ (De Girolami Cheney). This subtle use of geometric composition allows for the viewer to get a more complete idea of the biblical story in a single

Open Document