Ideal Democracy

1299 Words3 Pages

In the year 1492, Columbus set sail with the main purpose of going to Asia but on his voyage he stumbled across this land known as the New World. As the three captains of the ship discussed what they should do, they decided it was best to bring more people to this new land and promised them they would have a better life. Everyone was hoping that this new land was going to give the people more freedom. The New World, which is now known as the United States of America, was to have a different type of governing. This type of governing would be considered a democratic government. According to Becker, in the article Ideal Democracy, his term of democracy “… has always meant government by the many as opposed to government to the one…” (Becker 106). …show more content…

The more people involved, the more complications there are due to the fact that everyone has their own opinions. In the article, Ideal Democracy, Carl Becker states, “it is a striking fact that until recently democracy never flourished except in very small states…” (Becker 108). Back then it was difficult to spread news or have everyone listen to a speech in a large country due to the lack of technology, but now people have phones, various radio stations, and channels to help them stay tuned for the latest news. In churches everyone is allowed to give their opinions and will then easily come up with a solution to please the majority without too many conflicts. The person to replace the position of the president in a church organization is the arch bishop and to help with the decisions there are the board members. Putting the arch bishop in control of everything in the churches would have probably had a much different outcome, for example discouraging many to stop attending the services. To distribute the power evenly amongst the board members, each one of them is in control to complete a specific duty. For example, one of them is in control of how much and where the money goes, another to monitor the Sunday school rooms, and the others organize all of the other activities. In that case leaving things to be dealt with ease rather than …show more content…

There are many countries around the world that are operating just fine with other types of governments like constitutional monarchy and republics. Countries like Canada, running with two different types of government, one being parliamentary democracy and the other constitutional monarchy, are advancing much more than the United States even though their constitution forms maybe different. People there focus more on what the important things are, rather than needing to compete and have a sense of what and who is best. They have lower unemployment and tax rates. Another important factor in keeping a democratic country stable is economic security. If money does not stay stable it can create a separation of wealth. This complicates things because then there are people with much more advantages than others. In the article Why the Rich Are Getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer, Robert Reich explains how major businesses have found a way to increase profit with a cheaper labor force, thus causing the lower class to be jobless and struggling financially. If the rich have more privileges than the poor, then there are not equal opportunities for everyone. Those with more money are more powerful and this causes the issue that the vote of the people is not getting distributed equally. A problem in the United States is that the rich have more advantages, but in Canada things are distributed

Open Document