Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how minimum wage laws affect overall poverty
how minimum wage laws affect overall poverty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how minimum wage laws affect overall poverty
Say you buy a t-shirt costing £29, do you know where that money goes? Astoundingly, only 18p will go towards the workers wage, that’s 0.6% of the money you paid. The rest of the money will go to retail, the brand, material costs, transport cost, intermediary, the factory owners and overhead costs. Did you know that was what you were paying for? If you did, would you have thought twice about whether to buy it or not? This shockingly low pay leads to workers not receiving a living wage, meaning that they cannot afford the basic necessities for everyday life. A living wage, by definition, means that the workers receive enough money to provide for themselves and their family. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article …show more content…
This is because the legal minimum wage in garment-producing countries is far below the living wage, and the gap continues to grow as consumers demand cheaper clothing and the cost of living rises. The daily challenges for workers living in poverty is not limited to a lack of money. Other problems include a low calorific intake, limited access to health services, lack of social security, lack of decent housing, limited access to education and limited cultural and political life. One example of a country where the minimum wage falls far below the living wage is China, where the minimum wage is only £147.37 and the living wage is as much as £317.43. This means that workers would have great difficulty supporting their family and there would be no money left for …show more content…
They have calculated a living wage formula for Asia based on the assumptions that a worker is supporting themselves, as well as two adult dependants or one adult dependant and two to four children, that 50% of their wage goes towards food, that 40% goes to clothing, housing, travel costs, children’s education and health costs and that 10% goes towards discretionary income (i.e. entertainment, savings or pension). The Asia Floor Wage is calculated in PPP$(Purchasing Power Parity $) this is a hypothetic currency for World Banks based on peoples consumption of goods and services. This allows comparison of living standards across countries, regardless of currency. The AFW also carry out food basket research, this allows for a fair and relatively accurate living wage to be calculated. In order to reach a living wage, companies must include the principle of a living wage in their company policy, they must respect the freedom of association and work with unions and labour-rights groups. Companies have to publicly commit to a living wage bench mark, making it much harder for them to back down from it. It is important for companies to present a roadmap with a timeline for their payment of a living wage and to run programmes involving suppliers, trade unions and labour support groups as well as collaborating with stakeholders and acting transparently. There are different associations and
Sweatshops are similar to factory or workshop where workers work for long hours at very low wages and are forced to work in a poor working condition. Sweatshops have also been known widely in the world for its ethical issues. Although it seems to be lucrative by paying low wages to the workers, it still violates the fundamental requirements of the workers’ welfare and working condition. From the perspective of the businesses, paying low wages means reducing the cost of production and increasing in the profits.
Look down at the clothes you're wearing right now, chances are almost every single thing you are currently wearing was made in a sweatshop. It is estimated that between 50-75% of all garments are made under sweatshop like conditions. Designers and companies get 2nd party contractors to hire people to work in these factories, this is a tool to make them not responsible for the horrendous conditions. They get away with it by saying they are providing jobs for people in 3rd world countries so its okay, but in reality they are making their lives even worse. These companies and designers only care about their bank accounts so if they can exploit poor, young people from poverty stricken countries they surely will, and they do. A sweatshop is a factory
The gap in wealth between the rich and the poor continues to grow larger, as productivity increases but wages remain the same. There were changes in the tax structure that gave the wealthy tax breaks, such as only taxing for social security within the first $113,700 of income in a year. For CEOs this tax was paid off almost immediately. Free trade treaties broke barriers to trade and resulted in outsourcing and lower wages for workers. In “Job on the Line” by William Adler, a worker named Mollie James lost her job when the factory moved to Mexico. “The job in which Mollie James once took great pride, the job that both fostered and repaid her loyalty by enabling her to rise above humble beginnings and provide for her family – that job does not now pay Balbina Duque a wage sufficient to live on” (489). When Balbina started working she was only making 65 cents an hour. Another huge issue lies in the minimum wage. In 2007, the minimum wage was only 51% of the living wage in America. How can a person live 51% of a life? Especially when cuts were being made in anti-poverty and welfare programs that were intended to get people on their feet. Now, it seems that the system keeps people down, as they try to earn more but their benefits are taken away faster than they can earn. Even when workers tried to get together to help themselves they were thrown
What is found at sweatshops though, is quite the opposite. The highest wage within a sweatshop goes to the senior operators. The already low salary of a sweatshop worker, is actually decreasing, as the median wage for a senior operator at a sweatshop decreased by 29 percent from 1994 to 2010. These senior operators are of the highest rank, and according to Niagara Textiles, located in Bangladesh, now earn only 20 cents an hour, or 488 dollars per year. In fact, the same sweatshop have reports of workers being beaten for asking to receive their pay on time. They are also forced to work 14 hours a day, 7 days a week, with one day off at most. These workers have the longest hours, worst treatment, and most tedious conditions and still barely get paid enough to sustain themselves, let alone families. Sweatshops are completely immoral, and are under complete violation of the codes of
The wage gap is a major issue that is constantly brought up in the work place. Numerous people use the term “wage gap” to state how gender can affect somebody 's income. There has always been an understanding that men typically made more money than women. For a long time, women were not allowed to work; therefore men were in charge of “bringing home the bacon”. However, times have changed and there are various situations where a household is centered off a women’s’ income. Females can become single mothers who have a responsibility to care for a child(s). Responsibilities can include monthly payments of water and electric bills and even weekly payments towards groceries. Women have to acquire enough money so that they are able
The living wage movement is an economic reform movement that has become one of the most important public policy issues that has come up within the last 10 years. Although there is no single definition, it is often defined as an hourly salary that allows working families of four to have an income that is above the federal poverty line. This means that the livable wage laws often stipulate that hourly wages should be two to three times above the federal Mininum wage. However, unlike the Mininum wage, the living wage has so far only been enacted on the county and city level. Cities and counties enforce the living wage for companies that have contracts with their respective cities and counties, receive subsidies from their cities or counties, other economic benefits cities and counties provide to companies, and in some cases a livable wage is required for the tourist areas of the particular city. For cities and local governments, the livable wage is perceived as a measure to increase the welfare of the poor. However, like everything in life the livable wage creates its on costs that along with its benefits of increased wage to some low income earners.
...g on the changes of cost of living to prevent there becoming a wage floor.
What is your prototypical poor person? When I think of poverty, a dirty individual on the side of a freeway or someone cramped on the side of a bridge comes to mind. Today, the poverty icon has dramatically changed. This individual is an overworked, single mother. She is someone who works numerous hours to survive and to meet the basic needs for her family; however, her job is not paying enough no matter how many hours she is working. As a young adult, I realize that work ethic is one of the most important characteristics of the United States of America. Studies have shown that our people are working harder and more years than people in any other country. The harder a person works, the more money they expect to obtain, but this is not the outcome for everyone. The economy is booming; however, there are many hardworking individuals who are still struggling to survive from their minimum income. The Living Wage movement was established to combat and help several low-wage workers in the 1990’s. This movement gave them
First of all, a clear definition of the living wage should be established. The Universal Living Wage Campaign Organization says that if a person works forty hours a week, a living wage should provide the worker and his/her dependents with proper nutrition, health care, housing, clothing, and transportation. Some debate has arisen around this definition though for a few reasons. First of all, the number of dependents the wage-earner must support has a huge impact on the calculation of the living wage. A wage-earner who only has to support himself can survive with a much lower wage than a wage-earner who must support a family of five for example, so how should legislation take this into account? If the idea of the living wage is to pay workers based on need, a law that provides a wage capable of supp...
Minimum wage is a difficult number to decide on because it affects different income earning citizens in different ways. According to Principles of Microeconomics, by N. Gregory Mankiw, minimum wage is a law that establishes the lowest price for labor that and employer may pay (Mankiw 6-1b). Currently, the minimum wage in the United States is $7.25 per hour. For many years politicians and citizens have argued on what should be the minimum wage that would benefit the economy and society in general. A minimum wage was first established in 1938 to increase the standard of living of lower class workers. To discuss what is better for the country and its citizens, people have to understand what is a minimum wage and what are its effects.
Over the past decade, politicians have sought to reform the national poverty levels by lobbying for what is frequently referred to as a living wage. Living wages, on the most elementary level, are the absolute minimum a person must make per year or per hour to stay above the federal poverty level. While the number of people that receive living wages is still small, Wood (2002) suggests that this is a trend that is gaining momentum across the United States because it may help reduce employee turnover and increase worker productivity.
Market economies, as a whole, inherently and inevitably lead to poverty and a large class disparity. In a capitalist society, the ones who supply labor, the ones who work the hardest, are the ones who are paid the least. The owners, who are already rich, receive most of the profit and accumulate large masses of wealth. “Under capitalism workers receive only a small fraction of the wealth that they alone produce, while the lion’s share goes to the capitalist owners and to the bankers, landlords, insurance companies, lawyers, politicians, and all the other parasites who live off the back of labor and perform no useful work.” (SLP). Thus laborers are paid much less than the value of the labor that they contribute. As Karl Marx said, this is stealing, or exploitation of labor. The wages for...
In 1997, after ejecting the Conservative Party at the elections, the Labour government made the introduction of a minimum wage its first priority. As a result of the National Minimum Wage Act of 1998, the Low Pay Commission (LPC) was established. This commission is an independent body composed of 9 Low Pay Commissioners representing the different social partners with people chosen amongst employees, employers or with an academic background. The comm...
The idea is that those who have invested money into their education and acquiring skills should be rewarded. However, this doesn’t create a bid difference in wages, as it would be discriminating to those who could possibly not afford it. However, this is a very tame example of discrimination. Most cases of discrimination deal with gender or ethnicity. Even though it is hard to prove racism and sexism, there have been several cases where women or ethnic minorities have claimed that they are being paid less and treated worse that their ‘normal’ counterparts. Even though some would say that it is a very sceptical standing point, some claims have been backed up in court settlements. In the case of gender pay gap, people would argue that there are a variety of factors explaining the reasons for the difference in wage such as part-time working, geographical mobility and less human capital. However, you cannot dismiss the evidence that women and ethnic minorities do earn less money on average then the male majority so it cannot be dismissed as a factor affecting wage
Minimum wage has been a topic that has divided our nation for a while now. Some say there should be an increase in the minimum wage while others say the should not be. In my Argument today, I will be in support for the raising of the minimum wage. If the minimum wage is to be increased, it will provide low-income family with money to spend. Furthermore, the more people spend, the better the economy so raising the minimum wage will boost our economy. And finally, raising the minimum wage will reduce the gab between the rich and the poor, which is also an issue in our nation.