Alphabet Soup

972 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How Terrorism Violates Human Rights

Bigger is not Always Better
The philosopher Noam Chomsky once uttered these beautiful words, “Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it.”
Because, Noam Chomsky once preached those rather blissful words, that begged the question, why did the American war on terror create more terrorism?
The act of torturing is detrimental to the efforts by America to derail the spread of terrorism. America gathered one hundred fifty innocent people to press them for information. “One hundred-fifty Afghani, and or Pakistani civilians were rounded up and sent to Guantanamo Bay to be tortured for information(Telegraph.co.uk).” Alas, the American Government did not report that they had taken one hundred fifty innocent civilians, because they saw no reason to, “...Senior US commanders conclude that in dozens of cases there is “no reason recorded for transfer.”It seems rather evident that the American Government and high ranking military officials knew that they had acquired innocent foreigners, and that’s why out of, “...More than 700 Guantanamo detainees (Telegraph.co.uk.).” The one hundred fifty civilian foreigners were not recorded being detained and shipped to Guantanamo Bay for interrogation.
According to Terry E. Arnolds, former number two counter-terrorism official at the U.S. State Department, writes about how torture is the exact reciprocal of what American efforts are trying to decrease terrorism in the Middle East, “It increases the risk. There is a school of thought that it is deterrence. But I do not believe that. If people’s grievances multiply, you will have more terrorism. For example, military attacks in Iraq increase terrorism. If you ameliorate people’s grievances, you ...

... middle of paper ...

...ge upon Americans and their allies in the country of Afghanistan than in every year before 2001 accumulatively (GlobalResearch.co.uk).” Here is another graph to show how fast terrorism not on the global scale, but in a much more subjected area. I.e. the Middle East.

The best way to end terrorism is to not be involved in terrorism, or as Chomsky once spoke do not participate in engaging terrorists. If there is truly a way to end the spreading of terrorism it is not by torturing, drone striking, and fighting with boots on the ground, and sending a country's military force all across the world, to sit in one spot and be stationed there. The war on terror is a war in itself in the sense, that terrorism is always going to be a problem. America has the tools, money, and resources to end the war on terror. I personally suggest they try using another facet of doing so.

Show More
Related

  • Irrational Terrorism Essay

    646 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).

    Read More

  • Safety vs Freedom of Speech

    722 Words  | 2 Pages

    Look around you America. Your world is changing. Suddenly it’s no longer safe to fly in airplanes, attend sporting events, or just open your junk mail. Almost daily, news of threats and security breach’s litter the airwaves, leaving many asking the same question. “How can we make our country safe again?” Unfortunately, there isn’t a simple answer. America is united in the cause, but divided over the methods of preventing terrorism. At this time of uncertainty, many are urging Americans to “give up” some of their freedoms and privacy in exchange for safety. Regrettably, this wave of patriotism has spilled over, and is beginning to infringe on our fundamental liberties as outlined in the Bill of Rights. Since the September 11th terrorist attacks those who have made comments contrary to popular beliefs have prompted much debate about free speech. When America experiences some great trauma, our freedom of speech often faces its own trauma.

    Read More

  • The Case For Torture, by Michael Levin

    1173 Words  | 3 Pages

    If one is willing to harm thousands of people without the thought of repercussions of his or her actions, they have extraordinarily little care for their own lives and in turn would die before retracting their beliefs. So yes, the threat of someone harming thousands of people will always remain, but torture may not be the answer to that predicament. Works Cited Levin, Michael. A. “The Case for Torture.” Newsweek 7 June, 1982: n.pag.

    Read More

  • Toture And Ethics: Why Is Torture Wrong?

    1304 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another reason why some utilitarian thinkers will support torturing these suspect terrorist because law enforcement is saving American lives. On the other hand, other utilitarian thinks will condemn torturing terrorist because affects a personal moral standards to conduct themselves as a productive citizen (“The ‘ticking time bomb’ problem,” 2014). An additional reason why some utilitarian thinks condemn torturing terrorist because it provokes intense psychological pressure to reveal answers that law enforcement may want to hear that’s incorrect. Furthermore, depending on which utilitarian thinker discussing the use of torturing a terrorist, the action could be justified because it prevents further or future injury. Additionally, other utilitarian thinkers would rebuke this action because hurting another doesn’t help people that have already been injured by a terrorist

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Torture

    1328 Words  | 3 Pages

    In today’s society there are many issues surrounding the topic of torture. There are two sides to this argument. One side would be that torture should never be used, the other side would be that torture should be used if it is absolutely necessary. Many times when torture is used it is used to get information out of an individual. On many occasions people hear of torture being used on terrorists that have been captured. Torture is also used on Soldiers that have been captured during war. During times of war torture is often used by both sides to gain an advantage over the other side. The use of torture is a widely debated topic in today’s world.

    Read More

  • Is Torture Justified?: Is Torture Justified?

    1042 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue of torture is nothing new. It was done in the past and it’s done now in the 21st century. Without saying one side is right and the other side is wrong, let us discuss the part that we agree on and find common ground. We as Americans want to protect Americans from harms. So how do we prevent that from happening without torturing? It is impossible to get answer without some sort of questioning and intimidation techniques, since we know captured prisoners during war are not easily going to give up information. We know the enemy we face doesn’t follow the Geneva Convention or any law that pertains to war, so does that mean we shouldn’t also follow the Geneva Convention also, which prohibits torture? Of course not, because we want to be example for the world. Republicans argue that we have to do whatever is necessary to keep Americans safe, and Democrats argue it goes against our values and makes us look bad. We as Americans, as leader of the free world we

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Is Torture Justified?

    725 Words  | 2 Pages

    Is the intentional pain that an individual experiences justified if there is the potential to save the lives of many? Torture is the most used weapon in the “war against terrorism” but does it work? The purpose of this essay is to identify what the motives for torturing are, the effectiveness of torture, and important issues with the whole process of torture.

    Read More

  • Torture Persuasive Essay

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    Torture can prevent the attacks resulting in terror or can go and prove no one, no one can infringe the right of Americans in the result of another attack, and therefore torture is justifiable. The similarities between ISIS and Al Qaeda is scary and torture needs to be in the back pocket of all officials to prevent similar disasters. The clock stopped ticking on 9-11, and anyone on the street can tell oneself where they were the minute they heard. The use of torture could save the lives of thousands, send the message that America is in charge, and can become more commonly accepted in the eyes of disaster. A ticking bomb could be going off at any time, it could destroy a spouse, a son, a daughter, a friend, a neighbor, or maybe the threat is to oneself, torture could get the information to destroy the bomb before it destroys one’s life. Torture is justifiable.

    Read More

  • torture

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    In summary, torture can be physical, mental, or a combination of both of these aspect, and must induce pain or an aguish to bring about the information being sought. Next, if you apply either utilitarianism or Kant to torture neither allows for the use of torture to be ethical. Finally, the need to end torture facilitates the need for the suspect to lie if only to have the pain or anguish to end. In closing, the use of torture by law enforcement personnel in anti-terror operations is unethical and immoral.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Michael Walzer's View on Terrorism

    1574 Words  | 4 Pages

    Michael Walzer is an esteemed retired professor from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Walzer has written many books, essays, and articles. His essay, Excusing Terror, is one that best relates to the current events happening around the world. In this essay, Walzer talks about different reasons that people would want to resort to terrorism. In this essay I will argue Walzers view on Terrorism is correct in that terrorism is wrong because it is akin to murder, it is random in who it targets, and no one has immunity. I will also offer an objection to Walzer’s theory and explain why it is not a valid one.

    Read More

  • Pouring Salt on the Wound

    1326 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...less outside of intimidation. Currently we are debating whether torture would be a useful tool in society, but some have solved the answer for us many years ago. Those who commit crimes are often willing to sacrifice their life to keep the secret. Torture simply lowers us to their standards and facilitates increased terrorist activity in the long run. Why put salt on the wound when you have a Band-aid? Torturing cannot be morally justified.

    Read More

  • Deotological Perspective of State Surveillance

    1737 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the many details shown is that mass surveillance has not had an apparent impact on the prevention of terrorism (Greenwald, 2013). Most of the information gathered has not been used to impede a terrorist attack. Surveillance does not protect the rights to life, property and so on from being violated by terrorists. However it gives the citizen...

    Read More

  • Prevention of Terrorism in the US

    1120 Words  | 3 Pages

    Terrorism can take many different forms. Tragedies like 9/11 and domestic terrorism can both be prevented with increased homeland security. To prevent attacks like 9/11 from happening in the future, addressing issues with domestic terrorism, and the growth of homeland security, the U.S. still needs to be concerned with terrorism. Disasters like 9/11 still need to be prevented in the United States. The U.S. needs to be more involved with terrorism in general to keep domestic attacks from happening. Homeland security needs to be studied and improved in order to prevent terrorism. In conclusion, is it imperative that the United States continue its fight against terrorism.

    Read More

  • Research Essay: Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified?

    1685 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the Second Chechen War, there were an estimated 50,000 casualties (Effective human rights work is the best weapon against terrorism). There are nonviolent ways of dealing with oppression, following Gandhi’s example, and even the Boston Tea Party, which brought about changes with little violence. This Chechen conflict has been on-going for over 200 years, and unfortunately terrorist leaders continue to think terrorism will advance their cause even after much time has passed (Dershowitz 166). More often than not, terrorism hurts people, the economy, and religion.

    Read More

  • Terrorism in the 21st Century

    3445 Words  | 7 Pages

    On September 11, 2001, the destruction of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon changed the mindset and the opinion of nearly every American on the one of the most vital issues in the 21st century: terrorism (Hoffman 2). Before one can begin to analyze how the United States should combat such a perverse method of political change, one must first begin to understand what terrorism is, where it is derived from, and why there is terrorism. These issues are essential in America’s analysis of this phenomenon that has revolutionized its foreign policy and changed America’s stance in the world.

    Read More

More about Alphabet Soup

Open Document