Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Devolution from the Parliament of the United Kingdom to the Scottish Parliament
Scotland political system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Within this essay I am going to discuss, and evaluate the Scottish devolved political system.
Devolution is the transfer of powers and since 1999 the UK has changed due to the devolution. This was introduced to try and give more power to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland which along with England make up the UK. The votes for devolution took place in Scotland and Wales in 1997 and 1998 in Ireland . This is why the the Scottish Parliament along with the National Assembly of Wales and the Northern Ireland Assembly was created however devolution did not mean all nations changed in the same way, devolution meant different things for each nation due to administrative and historical differences. Devolution was not easy to achieve and took Scotland many years.((Devolution. (2013). Devolution of powers to Scotland.)
Separate parliaments no longer existed in 1707 when the Act of Union was put in to place. This created a single parliament for the UK based in London, known as Westminster. This discussion of having a separate parliament was a topic discussed for many years, going back to the end of the first world war. Between 1913 and 1919 it was in full discussion, Scotland was seen to be doing well economically and in 1919 conservative MPs set up a speaking conference to discuss the possibility of devolution. However it was not seen as a good idea due to the political crisis that was created by Ireland's want for independence that they were unable to achieve. For the next 10 years Scotland struggled due to the depression and seemed to be hit much harder than England and Wales, however by the 1930s Scotland were back discussing the idea of a separate parliament and even took part in a survey which gave people an ide...
... middle of paper ...
...backing Yes. Available: http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/scottish-independence-labour-official-backing-yes-1-3376042. Last accessed 17/04/2014.
Bibliography
http://www.aforceforgood.org.uk/devo/dm5#sourceseven
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/higher/modern/uk_gov_politics/gov_sco/revision/1/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/standard/modern/living_democracy/politics_in_scotland/revision/5/
https://www.gov.uk/devolution-of-powers-to-scotland-wales-and-northern-ireland
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/scotland_and_devolution.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/04/against-scottish-independence-no-vote_n_4895582.html
http://www.politics.co.uk/reference/executive-scotland
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/visitandlearn/Education/16285.aspx
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/may/03/scotland-devolution-decade-anniversary
It could be argued that Gladstone’s failure to unite his party, during a time when their ultimate support and confidence in his leadership was crucial, was a significant tactical error that contributed heavily towards the failure of the 1886 Home Rule Bill. The results of the 1885 general election were to have a significant impact on the political landscape of Britain; despite winning the most seats, the Liberals did not have an overall majority.As Parnell and the Irish Parliamentry Party (IPP) held the balance...
William Wallace is considered a legend in Scotland. For years, England and Scotland were at war, and behind many of the battles for Scotland’s independence was William Wallace. While the information about him, like any good hero, might be over exaggerated by some historians, what’s true is that he gave the country hope that Scotland could be free from English Tyranny. For years after he died, others took his place in saving Scotland from English rule.
The Welsh Assembly does not have the same power as Scotland and is only able to pass secondary legislation. Referendums were held to ask the question to people in Scotland and Wales as to whether they wanted devolution. Scotland had previously held a referendum in 1979 where a ‘yes’ vote scraped through with a 52% majority, however this did not pass due to a 40% turnout. This radically changed in 1997 where a ‘yes’ vote claimed a 74% majority with 60% turnout. In contrast... ...
The original Parliamentary System was created in Great Britain. This form of government includes a leader known as a prime minister, usually from a legislative party. The prime minister then selects a cabinet from their legislative majority party. Their objective is to focus on the daily operations caused by the government’s bureaucracy. The parliamentary government is in charge of initiating and passing all legislation created. The advantages of this system is that there is a unified government, there is no veto power, and the party is responsible for the decisions, consequences or rewards of policies that are passed. The Cabinet must “maintain the confidence” of parliament. Some disadvantages of this method is that divided governments are Constitutionally impossible to control. In addition to that, power is from this system falls all on the Prime Minister and Cabinet. They rule with the entire trust of parliament on them. If something goes wrong, it’s solely their
As is evidenced in the UK’s devolved unitary system, the Canadian federation and the European Union, each model aims to protect regional diversity and autonomy within it’s limitations, though the degree to which autonomy is granted creates a natural tension between unity and the desire for subsidiarity and self-determination. In devolution, asymmetrical federalism and the constitutional framework of a confederation there is the ability to manage diversity, discourage secession, and ensure stability, but with each of these comes the danger of divisive encouragement of difference. It is up to the individual governments in question then, how to best manage diversity and unity. As phrased by George Anderson, perhaps “stability can be enhanced if the culture goes beyond mere tolerance of diversity to the active embrace of diversity as part of what defines the country and gives it it's value. Institutional arrangements can hep societies better manage their conflicts, but institutions alone are not enough…” Perhaps the answer to encouraging national unity is not then found in the model, but in the contingencies of identity and
Devolution is the transfer of powers from a central body to subordinate regional bodies. In Scotland, Devolution was set up to restore legitimacy to a system of government that reflected Scottish preferences. The reason behind the demand for Scottish self-government is that Scotland had the historic status of nationhood before the Union of 1707 and within the Union, has a different set of legal, educational and religious institutions that reinforce a Scottish identity.
The most significant and challenge to the traditional view of parliamentary sovereignty was Britain’s membership of the European Community in 1972. The European Communities Act 1972 brought with it the requirement that European Law be given priority over domestic courts over conflicting issues of national law. This notion was a direct affront to parliamentary sovereignty, which required that if a later statute, contradicted and earlier statute, which sought to incorporate European Law into English Law, then the later statute should impliedly repeal the earlier statute. Therefore the European Communities act imposed a substantive limit on the legislative ability of subsequent Parliaments.
Parliament was used to "manage the Crown's business (Loades 90)." The parliament was also used to pass bills and legislature, but each time a bill was presented, it was mandatory that it would go through each house at least three times. As the age of the Parliament became older, it's procedures grew "more sophisticated, and more strictly enforced." (Loades 92) The Parliament also became a place at which "provided a very good platform for a monarch who wanted to say something of particular
When the Parliament Act of 1912 was passed it removed a huge obstacle. in the way of the home rule bill due to the fact that the House of Lords could not reject the bill if it had passed the House of Commons. three times and could delay the bill for up to two years. So in 1912 the third home rule bill was introduced by the liberals and Having made it through the Commons by Jan 1913 it was rejected by the Lords but would only have to wait until 1914 to become law under the new Parliament Act. Understandably, the introduction of a third home rule bill sparked a major political crisis and the time between the bill being rejected.
First off, it is important to understand the political and social whereabouts of Northern Ireland from 1898 to gage the changes that have been made in policy. Before 1921, the North and South of Ireland were under British rule. When the government of Ireland Act 1920 partitioned the island of Ireland into two separate states, Northern Ireland and Southern Ireland, the North of Ireland remained under British rule while...
On one hand, political constitutionalists argue that parliamentary sovereignty is the underlying principle in the British constitution as power and law making are bo...
Taylor, H. (1910). The constitutional crisis in Great Britain: Bicameral system should be retained with House of Lords reorganized on an elective basis. Concord, N.H: Rumford Press. 6th edition
7th edition. London: Pearson Longman, ed. Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
In their book, Smith and Wistrich state that Britain sensed a problem in the identity once there has been devolution of power to Scotland and Wales in 1998 (2009). It maybe true that Scots and Welsh feel more attached to their own na...
Hague, R. & M. Harrop (2010). Comparative Government and Politics. 8th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 64.