UK and the System of PR for General Elections

2179 Words5 Pages

UK and the System of PR for General Elections In our current system, First-Past-The-Post (FPTP), there are only two parties capable of being elected into government, the Labour and Conservative parties, perhaps including the Liberal Democrats as a potentially influential party. In our 'democratic' society, if you do not vote for one of these three parties, your vote has been wasted. There are only about 250 seats in the House of Commons that regularly veer between parties out of the 650 available, therefore, for a Labour voter in Malvern or a Conservative voter in Ebber Vale your vote has essentially been wasted, either you move to a different constituency or you change parties, otherwise your vote will effectively not count. This raises the question whether a fairer proportional representation system would lead to a fairer government, but as past examples such as the Weimar Republic have shown, proportional representation also holds problems. The result of smaller parties gaining seats is that in order to gain a majority the larger parties must form a coalition government with the smaller who then gain a disproportionate say in government as the larger party needs their support to get legislation through. No government since World War II has been elected on more than 50% of the vote, even the recent 'landslide' victory of Tony Blair's New Labour won with only 41.9% of the vote. This shows that the smaller parties would most certainly be necessary for a successful government in Britain. Therefore, although proportional representation has benefits such as giving a truer reflection of the vote, it can also have undesirable character... ... middle of paper ... ...lable to them Overall, I believe that the UK should reform its electoral system, but I think it should adopt the Jenkins Commission and AV+. The Independent Commission would have considered all types of reform, looked at the UK's political history, and produced a system that would best suit it. Although FPTP is not the uniquely British idiocy that it is sometimes portrayed as, it is used in 62 countries, covering more than half the world's electors, it has many faults, and I feel it allows the government to become too powerful with large majorities. I also feel that because of the UK's political history, coalition governments would not be seen as strong governments. Although AV+ may sometimes produce coalitions it is least likely than any other system to do so and it does allow for single-party governments.

Open Document