Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of social media
Effect of social media
Effect of social media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of social media
The article “Social media: Did Twitter and Facebook really build a global revolution?” was published in the online newspaper website called the Christian Science Monitor by correspondent Jina Moore. This article appraised the role of the two popular social networks websites called Facebook and Twitter in toppling autocratic governments. Moore relied on the wave of uprising in the Middle East as examples to justify that Twitter and Facebook might have helped in bringing the people together on a common goal but there are several ways in which the effectiveness of these websites in solely infusing a revolution is questionable. This article incorporated a versatile research with a good organization which yielded support to the reasoning of the author however the author’s vague introduction lessened the impact of an otherwise commendable article.
Moore began her article by citing countries such as Egypt, Tunisia and Libya as hostages of imminent revolution sparked by people through Facebook and Twitter. Moore followed by taking a contradictory view by arguing that even though analyst describe the role of social media as “organizing tools and as broadcasting platforms”, the latter has been predominantly utilized since other online activities such as the use of blogs in Tunisia helped more in “pushing events forward”. Moore further demeaned social media by claiming that without an “offline activity” any online movement is doomed to failure as the case in China and that past revolutions had sprung up successfully using other media sources such as the use of pamphlets during American Revolution. According to Moore, Government’s control of the cyber space also inhibits the intensity of a revolution. The article ended with the impression...
... middle of paper ...
...rengthening the purpose of the author such as the use of effective research and constructing relevance to the reader. However the article could further be improved if there could be a thesis statement or just a clear phrase that could keep the readers informed on what the author will follow in the article. Although Moore has used sufficient research, she could have mentioned the Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela led by Hugo Chavez. This is the most valid and exemplary evidence of a successful revolution that ever occurred in the 21st century without the use of any media. This upholds the idea that revolutions don’t need Twitter or Facebook, it is in fact the might of the people that eventually overcomes injustice.
Works Cited
Moore, Jina. “Did Twitter and Facebook really build a global revolution?”. csmonitor.com 30 Jun. 2011. Web. 9 Aug. 2014.
The article named “spring awakening” wrote by Jose Vargas describes the impact of social media in converting the mentality of young Egyptian generations into bold and defend their inalienable rights as a citizen. This article justifies how social media can mobilize a tremendous number of people to stand up for their rights. The reasons that inspire my emotion is emerging of “Wael Ghonim” as a legendary vocal figure of action for change, revelation of social media as earthquake for change, and fundamental soci-political change.
Malcolm Gladwell’s article "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted" raises a significant question about the prospective contribution of web-based social networking to the advent of progressive social movement and change. Gladwell bold declaration that "the revolution will not be tweeted" is reflective of his view that social media has no useful application in serious activism. Contrasting various elements of the “high-stakes” lunch-counter protests in Greensboro, North Carolina in the 1960’s with the “low-stakes” activism achieved through social media, Gladwell concludes that effective social movements powerful enough to impose change on longstanding societal forces require both “strong ties” among participants and the presence of a hierarchical organizations. In contrast, Gladwell characterizes the social networks as an interwoven web of "weak ties" that is inherently devoid of a hierarchy. Gladwell’s prerequisites for social movement are firmly based in strong body of sociological evidence, but his views regarding the nature of online social networks are laughably lacking in foresight and obstructed by a misleadingly selective body of evidence.
However, books and newspapers are not our sole source of the written word. Online blogs, articles, and newsletters now exist. Television and books have merged into one: the Internet. Revolutions, riots, and rebellions don’t just happen in our living rooms now, they happen on the go with us. On the subway, when we’re waiting in line at Subway, at our friend’s house as he talks about how he’s “way into subs.”
Malcolm Gladwell in his article “Small Change”, published in The New Yorker in 2010, identifies our present time as a long sequence of revolutions, in which the new instruments of mass media have changed the nature of social activism. I think it is possible to agree and disagree with his position at the same time. Obviously, Facebook and Twitter and the like have modulated the existing links between the authorities and the public. They have altered kinds of activism, and the organizations with so-called “strong-ties” gave way to a weak-tie gatherings somewhere on-line. I support Gladwell's claim that “friends” on Facebook, in spite of their assistance in providing their interlocutors with new ideas and news, can't be regarded true friends, ready to back you up in a dangerous, politically unstable situation.
In this paper, I consider the growing role of social media in presidential politics during the current era. The research questions the extent of the political impact of social media on the president and his communication with the public. It is necessary thus to examine the properties that make social media an attractive tool to use, the different ways the president interacts with social media, and both benefits and limitations of using social media as a platform for communication. As a result, it is essential to make conclusions regarding the nature of the relationship between social media and the presidential politics.
Both Nicholas Carr and Malcolm Gladwell debated how the Internet has affected humankind in both positive and negative ways. Malcolm Gladwell is a staff writer for the New Yorker and the author of Small Change:Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted. Nicholas Carr is a writer who has formerly written for the New York Times, The Guardian etc, he also wrote Is Google Making Us Stupid? Gladwell’s and Carr’s essays identifies how the internet has a damaging effect on people.
While many people throughout the world see social media as a trendy new application in the service of personal amusement, the political upheavals in the Arab world have shown how it can change the dynamics of modern day activism. The Arab Spring Uprising interlaced social unrest with a technological revolution. Blogs, news websites, twitter feeds, and political list servers became avenues for communication, information flow and solidarity. Being capable of sharing an immense amount of uncensored information through social media sites has contributed to the success of many Arab Spring activists. Social media played a role in facilitating the events of the Arab Spring, but the main issues are rooted in a broader set of economic, political, and social factors. This paper will examine how social media impacted the Arab Spring Uprising. Specifically, I will look at how social media introduced a novel resource that helped to created internet activist communities, changed the dynamics of social mobilization and revolutionized interactions between protesters and the rest of the world.
A. M. Kaplan and M. Haenlein, ‘Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media’, Business Horizons, vol. 53, no. 1, 2010, pp. 59-68.
Social movements come and go; they represent all manner of political aspirations, and aim to achieve their political objectives by influencing a particular target group’s opinion. Some groups reach out directly to just a few key decision makers or constituencies, while others act more indirectly by broadcasting their message to as wide an audience as possible. Popular forms of social media have played a significant influence in social movements throughout the last few years. Two prominent examples are Ai Weiwei’s use of the social platform: Twitter, and the use of Yik Yak at the University of Missouri. Social movements rely on the media for the mobilization of political support, validation in the mainstreams discourse, and opportunity to broaden
Over the past few years, social media has grown rapidly and gained the attention of individuals across the world. What exactly is social media? Basically, social media is a form of electronic communication that allows individuals to communicate with each other, create social profiles, and even share their perception on music and photos. Surprisingly, social media has caused some countries to produce boycotts and other types of rebellions. More than fifty percent of people learn about breaking news through social media. Recent statistics show ninety percent of adults in the United States own a cell phone (King 2015). Eighty-seven percent of those adults use the web, and sixty-eight percent of those adults connect to the web with their
Safranek, Rita. 2012. The Emerging Role of Social Media in Political and Regime Change. s.l. : Proquest, 2012.
Olenski, Steve “Social Media Usage Up 800% for U.S. Online Adults In Just 8 Years” Forbes.com Inc. 6 September 2013. Web. 6 February 2014
The impact of Social Media on Society Technology has come a long way from its existence till today. In today’s modern world, people are surrounded by technology everywhere. In the present, people are surrounded by disrupting technologies every day. Today, innovators are always creating new technologies that will make an impact on the daily lives of millions. Technology has made the lives of many people easier.
http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.waketech.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=3be91451-70d2-4198-a1f8-3acc7e3888cb%40sessionmgr10&vid=7&hid=6> Klass, Perry. “Seeking Social Media More as Portal Than as Pitfall.” New York Times. New
Hoover, Lisa. "How Social Networking Has Changed Society." PCWorld. 7 Apr. 2009. Web. 16 Feb. 2014. .