Analysis Of The Metamorphosis And The Turn Of The Screw

1573 Words4 Pages

“So many interpretations, so many exegetic passions and energetic controversies” (Felman). In The Turn of the Screw by Henry James there are many different interpretations. Readers use scrutiny to decode different parts of the text and create many different interpretations. The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka forces readers to think what the true cause of the problem is. However, compared to The Turn of the Screw, the interpretations in The Metamorphosis is from a lack of context. Both texts get a deeper meaning and interpretation when put side by side and examined. The largest factor contributing to the similarities between the two books is ambiguity. Both novels create a craving in readers for more information or at the least a moment of clarity. …show more content…

On the other hand, since Miles’ tone becomes much more sever. It is infered that the young boy has become possessed by the ghost of a previous mentor, Peter Quint. This victory for Peter Quint means that the governess is running out of time to save the children. The issue becomes that the incident is never clarified. The reader never finds out if such a thing did happen. Evidence that the governess is isolated suggests that the children are playing a trick. However, the changes of the children and the atmosphere of Bly imply that what meets the eye is not the truth. The Metamorphosis also causes readers to fear what the reality of the situation is. Mainly, why this happened to Gregor. However, this is not due to multiple interpretations but rather a lack of context. The story begins with, “One morning…he discovered that in bed he had been changed into a bug” (Kafka 1). Readers look at Gregor Samsa as a warning. There will come a point where the past does not matter except for what it has made. the only context is that Gregor was a mediocre salesman who supported his family. there is no way of knowing exactly what the reason for the transformation was. What is seen is a man who wakes up as a bug. …show more content…

This lack of clarity causes confusion for many readers. In The Metamorphosis, readers become confused when they try to decide if Gregor is or is not a bug. It is common knowledge that turning into a bug upon waking up is not a normal occurrence. However, from the first paragraph the story forces readers to question that idea. When readers look at Gregor and see a huge bug, they have good reason. The book gives vivid physical descriptions. Gregor observes in the solitude of his bedroom and, “found the itchy part, which was entirely covered with small white spots (he did not know what to make of them), ”(Kafka 4) . This quote is so vivid and specific that for it to be used in a figurative format becomes farfetched. The story refers to Gregor 's size, specific behaviors and, inability to function as a human throughout the book. Gregor also causes fear for his family. This is a fear of the unknown. Gregor solely being a bad person would not strike as much fear in his family as it did in the short novel. The immediate reaction of others also suggests that Gregor’s physical appearance has changed. However, evidence also suggests that Gregor is not a bug. Gregor 's size is evidence that the descriptions and the reactions of others are not based on appearances. Gregor spends a lot of time with internal reflections. All this thinking causes Gregor to show his human side to readers. This reflection shows his

Open Document