The 1930’s in Europe proved to be a time of great uncertainty, fear and tenacity for countries like that of Germany, Britain and France. Post- 1930’s sparked ignite a wildfire that would have the whole world question morality, justice and the meaning of war. But what sparked this horrific war can be accounted to the relationship between Germany and Britain just a few years before World War II began. During this precursor war stage, Britain and Germany exhibited this awkward, victimization relationship that can only be understood as an “Appeasement Period” of World War II. As most historians classify this relationship today as an appeasement relationship between Germany and Britain; where Germany bullied Britain into cowering in fear, and allowing Germany to dominating nations such as Austria and Poland. Germany is regarded as the aggressor that shut down any means of retaliation from Britain, and bullied Britain to allowing Germany to wreak havoc all over Europe without any consequence.
Therefore, the classic reasoning behind the start of World War II, was that the only country that could stop Germany’s world domination (Britain in this case) caught a case of the anxiety jitters and chose to hide in fear of Hitler and his nation than to brace for war and fight. However, this traditional reasoning is challenged by Norrin M. Ripsman and Jack S. Levy in the article, “Wishful Thinking or Buying Time? The Logic of British Appeasement in the 1930’s” where the two authors find intelligent and sound reasoning as to why Britain chose to avoid war with Germany at first. Ripsman and Levy believe that Britain initially avoided war and appeased Germany in order to upgrade their military defenses and impr...
... middle of paper ...
...traditional views, and find the correct evidence to support their theory. Barros sticks to the traditional ideas and just subtlety complements Ripsman and Levy’s theory by giving some sort of support but then scrutinizing it. Taking an immense risk as Ripsman and Levy did in their article proves their confidence in their argument and how it can be justified with evidence and intelligent reasoning. With the given evidence, and reputable authorship, Ripsman and Levy make their argument of British appeasement to seem more sound and reasonable than Barros and co. Therefore, in order to understand the British appeasement of Germany in the 1930’s, one must not always stick to traditionalist ideas, but expand their critical thinking to external reasoning and evidence to prove that the British were not cowering but cunningly were planning a war that Germany could not fight.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Appeasement Preluding WWII The path to war and the failure of appeasement began with the conflict between Italy and Ethiopia. Although the invasion of Manchuria by Japan was an important event in the build up to war, the failure to act was more based on isolationism than appeasement. The first act of appeasement was the Hoare-Laval Pact which gave Abyssinia to Italy to quell Mussolini’s expansionist goals [Understanding, 25]. Though there was outcry over rewarding Mussolini’s aggressions, there was little support for war in Britain and France.... [tags: World War II, League of Nations, United Nations]
1606 words (4.6 pages)
- The Policy of appeasement which Neville Chamberlain, prime minister of Britain from 1937-1939, stood by has been criticized by Churchill, prime minister of Britain 1040-1945, as we well as other historians. Appeasement refers to the act of complying to the demands of another in order to prevent war. Historians argue whether this policy was effective. There are two sides to the argument, while some historians argue that if Chamberlain had abandoned the appeasement policy and instead adopted a more aggressive policy towards Hitler’s moves the Second World War could have been averted.... [tags: army, Hitler, economic]
774 words (2.2 pages)
- Many historians and famous authors, such as Mark Twain and Sigmund Freud, have trouble believing that William Shakespeare truly wrote the plays published in his name. As TIME writer Jumanna Farousky wrote, “Doubters started questioning the true identity of the writer in the late 19th century. Ever since then, the theory of an alternate author has flirted with the mainstream as some scholars and researchers have tried to get the broader academic community to treat the question as a legitimate debate”.... [tags: Sir Francis Bacon was the true creator]
1450 words (4.1 pages)
- Introduction According to Mondy (2008), “Recruitment is the process of attracting individuals on a timely basis, in sufficient numbers, and with appropriate qualifications to apply for jobs with an organization” (p.110). With organizations realizing their turnover rates, employee recruitment efforts have – of late – been a top priority for human resources (HR) departments. These efforts are key in job performance and the overall effectiveness and efficiency of an organization. The recruitment strategy implemented should be well thought out and organized in order to attract top performers.... [tags: human, efficiency, effectiveness, organization]
966 words (2.8 pages)
- This essay analyses the responsibility of Neville Chamberlain and his highly controversial Appeasement theory which hypothetically prevented the outbreak of the Second World War. The policy of Appeasement epitomised by the Munich agreement, is a pact signed in 1938 between Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy, which allowed Hitler to annex Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland (area along Czech borders) to prevent the onset of a major war. Appeasement has been drastically criticised since it ended in a “humiliating failure” when Germany attacked Poland in 1939 (McDonough, 2002).... [tags: Analysis, Neville Chamberlain]
873 words (2.5 pages)
- Discuss the reasons why, in the period 1934-38, British critics of appeasement had such a limited impact on British policy towards Germany. The supporters of appeasement came from diverse groups, such as the Conservative Party, the Church of England and a number of right wing extreme elements. The only significant group on the centre left to support Chamberlain were pacifists. The very way in which such influential groups gave support to the policy, meant that it would be an even greater challenge for the opposition to discredit it Few Tories favoured direct military involvement in European problems.... [tags: World History]
1996 words (5.7 pages)
- The Support of the Appeasement of Hitler by the British Mass Media Appeasement was the conciliatory policy adopted by Britain and France towards the aggressive foreign policy of Nazi Germany in the years preceding the Second World War. In Britain it is normally associated with the Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain but was also followed by Stanley Baldwin. It has been argued by historians such as Richard Cockett that the press in Britain was manipulated by Whitehall - especially during Chamberlain’s years as Prime Minister – to publish only pro-appeasement articles and news and therefore “no alternative to the policy of appeasement was ever consistently articulat... [tags: Papers]
837 words (2.4 pages)
- Appeasement The task of explaining why appeasement, has been continuously addressed by historians over the years. To date, there is still no single cause identified. Nonetheless there is however a general consensus amongst historians that the frightful events of world war one, distilled a sense of fear and regret amongst British society, and consequently Britain strived to prevent any future war, through whatever means necessary. In the aftermath of World War 1, lay a mutual understanding between the British government and society that never again should a catastrophe such as World War 1 occur, it was described as the "war to end all wars" reinforcing the view that it was a cataclysmic e... [tags: History European Historical Essays]
4209 words (12 pages)
- The 1920s had a good outlook towards peace, but near the end of the decade and throughout the 1930s signs of war were forming. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of World War I. Germany, Italy, and Japan took aggressive actions, and neither the League of Nations nor the democratic countries were stopping them. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain suggested the policy of appeasement towards Hitler to keep peace. Europe moved closer to war as these actions were made.... [tags: essays research papers]
919 words (2.6 pages)
- Justifying Appeasement Appeasement was the foreign policy followed by the British and French governments in the 1930s, whereby they did not attack or confront other governments, specifically that of Germany's, when international laws were breached, but rather gave into some of the demands to keep the peace. After the horror and dramatic loss of innocent lives (amassing over 3 million) in the First World War, both the French and the British governments were keen to avoid any more blood shed and their pacifist policies meant they started to take a very lenient attitude towards breached international laws.... [tags: Papers]
1186 words (3.4 pages)