We as a country have been caught up lately in the idea that we need to take away people 's guns in order to make people safer. Adolf Hitler once said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens (Quotes About).” Do I really need to explain where history seems to be repeating here. What people do not seem to understand is that by trying to control guns, you are just making it easier for those who would mean to do harm to get away with it. This is especially true in states with really strict gun laws.
Politicians have been recently pushing the fact that they want to heavily regulate gun laws in some hope that it will make our country a safer place. This topic is a hot debate right now as political public figures like Hillary Clinton are campaigning that if we let gun control stay the way it is, according to a youtube video of a news show talking about an interview she did, “ We are going to have so many people with guns that are going to be fully licensed, fully validated in settings where they can be in a movie theater and they don’t like somebody chewing gum loudly or talking on their phone and decide they have a perfect right to defend themselves.” (Cupp) I agree with what the news reporter covering the story says after the clip is played. She says that Clinton was more focused on the gum chewers instead of the thousands that die every year in cities where guns are illegal and to focus more on those issues then the made up diversionary tactics used by Mrs. Clinton to gain political support. What people like Mrs. Clinton do not seem to understand is that even though you make guns harder to get for the average joe, criminals are still going to find ways to get the things they need to commit the...
... middle of paper ...
...et in place I can see how some of them can be useful. One example is those with a felony are given a lifetime ban from purchasing a firearm in all three of the states mentioned. Same with those who are committed to a mental hospital. Laws like those are not too constraining and can be seen as reasonable laws to be put into place. However, laws that are meant to restrict people who are just trying to protect themselves are not helping anybody. Through my research of the gun control laws in New York, New Jersey, and California as well as the lack of correlation between the crime rate indexes of these three states compared to my control state of Vermont, I have shown substantial evidence that no matter how strong of gun control laws theses states put into place the crime rate in theses states has little to no correlation between having strong gun control laws in place.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The right to bear arms has gone way back to when Indians ruled the land. People with guns have fought and won our freedom from many different countries. Since we have had guns for so long in America, it has become a tradition to get or own a gun. It would make people go insane if the people got their right to bear arms taken away from the government (Alters2 1 of 8 ). Since the beginning of fire arms it has become a tradition for most families in America. Firearm ownership has been an America tradition and it has been in America since the early 1600s when England sent people to North America.... [tags: Gun Control Essays]
2195 words (6.3 pages)
- Nathan Miller Mr. DeCenso American Lit October 7,2015 1) The law won 't help so having a handgun by your side would be key. I do not believe in gun control it is important to have a gun by your side. But I do believe in moderate gun control 2) The debate 3) The use of guns 4) The Second Amendment 5) Conclusion Gun control Handguns are easy to get, that 's why they are the weapon of choice for people who choose to use them for self-defense.... [tags: Gun politics in the United States, Firearm, Gun]
994 words (2.8 pages)
- Arguments against Gun Control The development of arguments surrounding gun control corresponds to the increased violence and problems related to weapons and firearms use. This then prompted the expansion of gun control initiatives and has shapes public opinion particularly in the promotion of increased regulation to banning. Due to this, it became controversial as it split the opinions of the citizenry particularly in their stance to advance different objectives. Arguably, the process of developing gun control remains to be detrimental due to its capacity to challenge individual rights and liberty, undermine the value of guns and firearms in the promotion of deterrence and self-defense and... [tags: Gun Control Essays]
982 words (2.8 pages)
- "I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it." -- Clint Eastwood Gun control has a history dating back to 1791, when the Second Amendment of the Constitution was ratified. However, more recently, the debate over gun control has escalated into a much more public issue to which many citizens can relate. After all, stories about incidents involving guns appear frequently today in newspapers and on television or the radio. One could say that the debate started with the passage of the Gun Control Act of 1968, which banned ownership of guns by certain groups of people and regulated the sale of guns.... [tags: Gun Control, 2015]
861 words (2.5 pages)
- ... Firearms fatalities has decreased by twenty eight percent from 1993 to 2000 (“Gun”). In a perfect world nobody would have to die because of a crime, but this is not a perfect world. Even though it would be great for there to be no crime, murders, violence, and attacks, that is not the case. There will always be those things, so wouldn’t it be just a little bit better if most the people who had to experience those things were criminals. People who were already set on the path of destruction, that have full intent in hurting other people.... [tags: society, kill, control, crime]
656 words (1.9 pages)
- Gun Control has both advantage and disadvantage sides. One of the pro side of the gun control law is that The Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns. Meaning people have right to own a gun, however that does not mean the right is unlimited. People have to follow the rules in order to possess a gun. The con side of the gun control law is The Second Amendment of the US Constitution protects individual gun ownership. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." According to this amendment, it gives people a right to own the gun w... [tags: Gun politics in the United States, Firearm]
1262 words (3.6 pages)
- How many people are killed every year with house hold guns. By being armed, we can stand up to a regime of control. But this encourages an extreme individualism, not a coherent community. When the State starts deciding what is and isn’t good for you, when it begins acting upon paternalistic grounds, then we ought to start worrying. Freedom only means something when we’re free to act stupidly (again, all with caveats), when we’re free to express ourselves. Guns, however, change this dynamic entirely.... [tags: Firearm, Gun, Handgun, Gun politics]
1206 words (3.4 pages)
- The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government.... [tags: Firearm, Gun politics, Gun, Weapon]
1786 words (5.1 pages)
- Gun Control If you look at the hot topics in political debate these days, you will find that Gun Control is among the most popular. The reason it is such a hot topic is because people are either all for it or not for it at all. Also because people will fight for every inch of there being for what they believe in when it comes to this topic. In this it will talk of the debate itself, the pros, the cons, and the rights that we have to keep the guns. Plus it is in the constitution that we can bear and buy arms.... [tags: Firearm, Rifle, Gun politics in the United States]
1885 words (5.4 pages)
- In the future of this great country, we could lose the right to protect our own. This would be done by destroying our right to bear arms. The fear of guns, a mandated background check, infringing on our Second Amendment rights, and keeping the regulations of firearms within each individual state are the current issues that are impacting the federal government’s need to control our gun rights. This paper will present these four issues in more detail, along with a proposed solution to this problem.... [tags: United States Constitution, Firearm, United States]
1378 words (3.9 pages)