Summary Of John Tartaglio And Chapin's From Tragedy To Triumph

888 Words2 Pages

During the last several chapters of the nonfiction novel From Tragedy to Triumph, authors John Tartaglio and Andrew Chapin assert that cowering at the possibility of failure ruins more opportunities than failure itself ever will. While taking readers on Tartaglio’s journey through running the whole 26.2-mile distance of the New York City Marathon, Tartaglio and Chapin want readers to push past their fears and take ownership of their performance. Through the use of rhetorical questions, the authors allow for readers to reflect on the progress they have made on reaching their own goals. Tartaglio and Chapin are attempting to appeal to readers who are struggling to have a positive perspective on a current difficulty they are facing, as well as …show more content…

We do not only see Tartaglio as the persevering man who refused to give up, but rather as the man who fought off the temptation to give in to his pain. Tartaglio is not some perfectly well-rounded man who always fought off the urge to take a break. He understood his limits, and worked to break them. However, I believe that the authors could have made an even stronger argument by providing quotes from real people who served as major influences in Tartaglio’s life, such as his parents, sister, therapists, and trainers. Readers are only exposed to Tartaglio’s predicament from his point of view, with the stylistic touch-ups of Chapin. How are readers expected to fully embrace Tartaglio’s story of endurance and fighting through tough times, when the only evidence supporting these arguments are written by Tartaglio and solely derived from his emotions and how he saw various situations? I wish that the authors included more anecdotes about times where Tartaglio did give up. By doing this, I could relate more to Tartaglio. Tartaglio is painting himself in a beautiful light, but this takes away the realness from the situation. It is difficult for Tartaglio and Chapin to reach out to readers who are …show more content…

Tartaglio seems almost too-perfect. Tartaglio and Chapin should have highlighted more times where Tartaglio gave in to the temptation of giving up, and then focused on how he used giving up as a foundation to push himself to reach his goals. Finishing the first 10k was an incredible feat, yet Tartaglio deemed it as a failure because he finished in last place. Finishing a 10k is fantastic for any person, especially someone with no legs. Rather than focusing on Tartaglio not reaching his extremely far-fetched goals and using this as motivation to achieve other goals, the authors should paint Tartaglio as a man who was not always this persevering guy. It is unrealistic and difficult to believe that Tartaglio never gave up, not even once. It would be easier to reach out to readers and encourage them to not give in to their doubts if they could relate to Tartaglio’s mistakes and

Open Document