Tracking Technique in Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality

2359 Words5 Pages

Zhou et al (2008, p.193) observe that the difference between tracking techniques in Augmented Reality (AR) and those used in Virtual Reality (VR) stem from the interoperability of the two systems. On the other hand, State et al (1995, p.1) contend that there are significant contributions to tracking in VR than AR. Work prior to that of State et al (1995) indicates that the better fraction of tracking systems in VR are magnetic. However, Zhou et al (2008, p.196) observe that significant developments on tracking in AR are either vision-based, sensor-based or hybrid techniques. Bostanci et al (2011, p.425) classify the AR tracking methods in four major categories comprising of indoor, outdoor, fusion and recent approaches.

The tracking techniques for VR and AR on the indoor platform are related in the sense that they both use markers that emit signals such as the magnetic and light active markers (Bostanci et al, 2011, p.425; State et al, 1995, p.1). Berre et al (2006, p.5) confirm the argument by stating that one of the most usually applied orientation and track position in AR is the use of magnetic sensor like the Polhemus Isotrac. Moreover, Joele (2005, p.15) offers that tracking in AR involves a set of stern requisites one of them being the high six Degree of Freedom (DOF) when it comes to spatial accuracy in orientation and position. Wagner and Schmalstieg (2009, p.193), while researching on the AR tracking in mobile phones argue that both AR and VR need 6-DOF pose devices’ tracking. These devices include tangible interface objects for AR and head-mounted displays (HMD) for VR. Additionally, Neumann and Cho (1996, p.111) and Zhou et al (2008, p.193) argue that every tracking system contains a device that has the capability to g...

... middle of paper ...

... Chen, D.T., Garrett, W.F., & Livingston, M.A. (1995). Superior augmented reality registration by integrating landmark tracking and magnetic tracking. In SIGGRAPH '96 Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. doi:10.1145/237170.237282.

Vallino, J.R. (1998). Interactive augmented reality. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.

Wagner, D., & Schmalstieg, D. (2009). History and future of tracking for mobile phone augmented reality. 2009 International Symposium on Ubiquitous Virtual Reality (2009). doi: 10.1109/ISUVR.2009.11.

Zhou, F., Duh, H.B-L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR, ISMAR, 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 193-202. doi: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637362.

More about Tracking Technique in Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality

Open Document