State Rubbish Collectors Ass’n v. Siliznoff
When a person violates another person’s legal rights deliberately it is considered an intentional tort (Mayer et al. n.d.). Intentional torts are when someone is assaulting someone, trespassing on a person private property, false imprisonment of an individual or individuals, invasion of someone’s privacy, or if a person conducts fraudulent behavior and the deliberate violation contains an act to bring harm as a consequence of those actions (Mayer et al. n.d.). The presented case is an example of an intentional tort case.
On January 29, 1952 in L.A. California at the Supreme Court of California, the plaintiff Mr. Kobzeff, the president of the State Rubbish Collectors Association, states that the defendant Mr. Siliznoff was collecting trash in an area that the association covered and demanded that Mr. Siliznoff give the association back payment for services that he rendered to Acme; a business in the associations service area. The plaintiff filed to collect payment from the defendant on promissory notes after the defendant had not paid on the said promissory notes. Defendant claims he was verbally threatened by the plaintiff and was told if he did not join the association he would be beaten up and his business ruined and counter sued stating intentional infliction of menta...
... middle of paper ...
...ourt case was reversed and the judgment went in favor of the defendant stating that the purchaser’s breach of warranty, the cause of this action, and the evidence was not sufficient to sustain a verdict against the appellant. Judge request verdict be returned in favor of the defendant. There was no proof to show that there was any material defect or problems with the workmanship in the glass of the automobile in question and the injury the plaintiff received was not of proximal cause and makes the case invalid. There were no dissenting opinions in this case.
State Rubbish Collectors Ass’n v. Siliznoff, 240 P. 2d 282 (Cal.1952)
People v. Watson, 637 P. 2d 279 (Cal. 1981)
People v. Watson, 677 Cal. App. Supp. 22 (Super. Ct. Cal. 1980).
Darling v. Charleston Hospital, 211 N.E. 2d 253 (Ill. 1965)
Baxter v. Ford, 35 P. 2d 1090 (Wash. 1934)
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Negligence Negligent torts are one of the most common types of tort cases. Negligent torts are cases that look at the actions of an individual or company that are not deliberate, but more so when an individual or company failed to act toward as a reasonable individual should, to someone whom he owes a duty to. Negligence action found in this particular tort can lead to personal injuries or monetary damages. The elements which constitute a Negligent Tort are defined as: a person must owe a duty or service to the victim(s) in question, and the individual, or company, who owes the duty must violate the promises or obligation; an injury, then must occur because of the specific violation, and t... [tags: Tort, Negligence, Law, Common law]
1077 words (3.1 pages)
- The Absence of the Concept of Transferred Malice in Irish Tort Law Introduction The title of this assignment, which i propose that i shall be revisiting for the purposes of this tort project is that: “the concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law” In dealing with this topic I will inevitably be looking at what a battery is, what is transferred malice, cases in other jurisdictions which have accepted the concept of transferred malice in tort law, transferred malice in crime and why it is accepted in criminal law, and finally my arguments as to why I believe it should be adopted into our jurisdiction.... [tags: Tort Law]
1887 words (5.4 pages)
- Issue To determine based on the case facts, if Alma can sue Norma for negligence based on tort law or not. Rule To establish negligence, it is imperative that three main conditions are to be satisfied. Firstly, it needs to be proved that the defendant had a duty to care directed towards the plaintiff. Secondly, there needs to be a breach of this duty due to the negligent conduct of the defendant. Thirdly, the plaintiff should have suffered harm due to the duty to care being breached by the defendant (Lindgren, 2011).... [tags: Negligence, Tort, Tort law, Duty of care]
1035 words (3 pages)
- In tort law there is negligence and within this there is the duty of care element, which helps to decide if compensation should be emplaced. The concept of negligence is a difficult one and has been broken into three separate parts: · Duty of care owed by the defendant to the claimant · Breach of that duty of care · Damage caused to the claimant as a result of the defendant's breach in duty of care. All three parts have to be present before negligence can be proved. One requirement for proving the tort of negligence is that a duty of care exists between the claimant and the defendant.... [tags: Tort Law]
957 words (2.7 pages)
- Introduction: Tort is defined as conditions where the illegal conduct of one party causes harm to another party. For example, party A had to face loss due to unethical or wrongful deeds of party B. Tort can be either negligent that is unintentional or intentional. Some examples of intentional torts include fraud, defamation, offense, insult, assault or interference among others. For example, during a business meeting, an employer suffers from reputation loss or insult due to the wrong deeds of another employer, with whom he had a clash before.... [tags: Tort law, Tort, Negligence, Law]
1254 words (3.6 pages)
- In this essay we are able to identify the Law of tort and present a case from New Zealand covering tort of negligence and vicarious liability. The word ‘tort’ is derived from the Latin term tortem to twist and implies conduct which is twisted or tortious. It now means a breach of some duty independent of contract giving rise to a civil cause of action and for which compensation is recoverable. A Tort is a species of civil injury or wrong no civil injury is to be classed as a tort unless the appropriate remedy for it is an action for damages.... [tags: Tort, Tort law, Negligence, Strict liability]
909 words (2.6 pages)
- Deceit is purposeful lying that causes a loss for the claimant or gain for the defendant. Conversely, a negligent misstatement is an incorrect, careless statement that causes loss for the claimant, in which the defendant acts on unreasonable grounds. In order to establish a negligent misstatement, the misstatement must fulfil the requirements for negligence. The tort of negligence involves three components: duty of care, breach of duty, and damages. Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) is the origin of the tort of negligence in modern English law.... [tags: Tort, Tort law, Duty of care, Negligence]
1201 words (3.4 pages)
- “The categories of negligence are never closed”. [Lord Macmillan in Donoghue v. Stevenson- (1932)] The tort of negligence is a relatively recent phenomenon, which has come to become the most dynamic and rapidly changing areas of liability in modern law. Lord Macmillan’s assertion that “ the categories of negligence are never closed” suggests how courts possess the power to expand the area of liability by bringing in new duty situations as a result of new set of facts coming is everyday.... [tags: Tort Law]
876 words (2.5 pages)
- There are three elements that must be present for an act or omission to be negligent; (1) The defendant owed a duty of care towards the plaintiff; (2) The defendant breached the duty of care by an act or omission; (3) The plaintiff must suffer damage as a result - be it physical, emotional or financial. The court might decide that Freddy (the plaintiff) was owed a duty of care by Elvis (the defendant) if they find that what happened to Freddy was in the realm of reasonable forseeability - any harm that could be caused to a 'neighbour' by Elvis' actions that he could reasonably have expected to happen.... [tags: Tort Law]
1121 words (3.2 pages)
- Tort Reform A tort is wrongful interference against a person or property, other than breaches of contract, for which the courts can rectify through legal action. The reform effort is aimed at reducing the number of unnecessary lawsuits that burden the court system while still allowing injured parties compensation when they’ve been wronged. This latest effort at tort reform has given rise to the same spirited rhetoric that might be found in a courtroom. With the prominence of the tort reform debate on state legislative floors across the country, many states have introduced and even passed bills that address reform issues within their respective states.... [tags: Tort Civil Justice Law Essays]
1713 words (4.9 pages)