Free Kant Essays and Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays

Free Kant Essays and Papers

Page 8 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant

    • 728 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As time passes ideology and government change, for the better or worse. Kant, Marx, and Hobbes all lived in a different world with their own set of set of difficulties and opinions. I believe none of them are truly correct in their ideas of humanity and government, and by understand their beliefs in relation to the time period we can better understand all of their works while at the same time formulate our own perspective on the issue. Before delving into their beliefs we need to first understand

    • 728 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy: Immanuel Kant

    • 1083 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Immanuel Kant, like his predecessors John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, believed morality was based on standards of rationality. His influential work, The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, argues for the existence of a “foundational principle of a metaphysics of morals”. 1 Such a principle, he asserts, must account for three propositions of morality: only actions done from duty have genuine moral worth, moral value arises from the maxim its action involves, not from the purpose that is to be achieved

    • 1083 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy of Immanuel Kant

    • 1411 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Descartes; then there are also those who believe that one can have a foot on both sides, like Immanuel Kant. To be on one side or the other never gives you full knowledge you must be willing to use your senses and your reason to form ideas. Kant was to first to step away from choosing a side. Kant changed philosophy in the way that he showed that certain aspects of rationalism and empiricism were wrong. Kant was also the first to say that objects conform to our knowledge meaning that rationality puts a

    • 1411 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Luther

    • 1320 Words
    • 3 Pages

    what freedom is best is in the hands of the pursuer. Immanuel Kant freedom of self differs from Martin Luther’s freedom for faith, but both come together as a way of improvement for mankind. Law is what rules the lands and is a guideline in which the people follow for that is how society works and continues to prosper. Being able to, “test any particular measure that can be agreed upon as a law for people to impose upon themselves” (Kant, 55). This thinking of possible self imposed law is a way for

    • 1320 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant: Moral Theories

    • 992 Words
    • 2 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    to Timmons, the field of philosophy is not complete without the mention of Kant whose contributions were major (205). This, he adds, was influenced by his originality, subtle approach and the difficulty of his works. Timmons cites that moral requirements are a requirement of reason, which is the ideology of Kant’s Moral theory; hence, immoral act is an act against reason. Consequently, speaking on the terminologies of Kant we visualize moral requirements as Categorical Imperatives (CI) grounded on

    • 992 Words
    • 2 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    drawbacks, thus to enable one to make a methodical decision, it is important to understand the basic principles of each. However, in this paper there will be a main focus on Kantian Categorical argument and then discussing the issue of etiquettes. Immanuel Kant, one of the most famous western philosopher epitomized the Enlightenment’s faith in reason, the scope and limits of which

    • 1620 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Minority Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Much has changed ever since Kant’s views during the eighteenth century. According to Kant, “Enlightenment is the human being’s emergence from his self-incurred minority” (17). Minority is the inability of individuals to use reason independently of others. The concept of minority is an important part of Kant’s argument on what prevents society from achieving enlightenment. As the foundations of enlightenment were developing, society was slowly becoming aware of this once perceived radical idea. Society

    • 583 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Animal Captivity

    • 1197 Words
    • 3 Pages

    supporting the use of animal captivity. I am starting with Kant, who provides a strong argument for animal captivity. Kantian Ethics holds the view that we do not have any direct ethical duties to non-human animals. We only owe ethical duties to rational beings, and non-human animals are not included in this group. The value humanity comes from our capacity to be governed by autonomous, rational choices. Since non-human cannot be part of this, Kant believes we can do as we please with them. This can be

    • 1197 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill vs. Kant

    • 610 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “We will not lie, steal or cheat, nor tolerate anyone among us who does.” This is the United States Air Force Academy honor code which every officer must swear by when he enters into office. But is this code meant to be followed with absolutism – without fail – even when one might benefit oneself or another individual with a white lie? What happens when an officer attends a dinner party with his wife and is approached by the hostess, asking whether he liked his meal, when indeed he did not? Is the

    • 610 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Casaubon’s action is not morally permissible because Kant requires that a morally permissible action satisfies both clauses. Dorothea could take Casaubon’s suggestion to make his promise, but there is a conflict with it. She realizes that he wants to control her even after he dies. Since the action of making her to make his promise does not meets both clauses to Kant’s second formulation the action is not morally permissible. In this context, both Kant and Mills measure morality in different ways. Utilitarianism

    • 678 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays