Chinese Religious and Ethical Systems It has often been said that the Chinese are not deeply religious. It is true that they have shown a comparative indifference to metaphysical speculation; Chinese culture was perhaps the first to develop an intellectual skepticism concerning the gods. Confucianism Confucius (Kong Zi) lived from 551 to 479 BC in the state of Lu (in modem Shandong province). He came from a family of officials and his concern was with the restoration of the Way (Dao) of the ancient
In a Democratic economy, people elect their representatives through the system of voting. The choice of electing a strong government is always there in people’s hands. As much as casting the vote to a righteous government is important, it’s equally or more important that it is done right. The decision of forming the ruling government is based on the vote count and there is a high risk of voter fraud to take place during elections. Casting vote on others behalf or rigging to increase the vote share
scathing attacks on reason; they conceal their ultimate meanings through complexity: one through paradox, the other with the metaphor of the mask; they both advocate the reawakening of a child-like sense of wonder, and ultimately, they found their ethical systems on courage. Using the same philosophical tools, each thinker carves out a completely unique niche into intellectual history: one within the framework of orthodox Christianity, the other as a forefather of modern Existential thought. Chesterton
professor, Dr. David Lurie, who is aging into a disrespectful decline. But this story tells of not only the strife and wrenching change that exist in the microcosm of Lurie's mind, but also the parallel themes that underlie the social, political, and ethical systems that are the reality of present day South Africa. As David Lurie interacts with people and creatures outside his normal milieu, the fault lines between his myopic view of the world and reality begin to crystallize with a disconcerting clarity
LaVey, put it. (LaVey 1) Satanists also belong to an organization such as the Church of Satan or the Temple of Set, and I do not belong to any such organization. I do not call myself an atheist because atheists tend to not have well-developed ethical systems. I am a secular humanist. This means that I have no belief in supernatural beings or forces (gods or goddesses, angels, demons, leprechauns, etc.); that rational thought is more important to me than blind faith; and that I value freedom of expression
is a religious exercise(-------). There is no clear line between what instructors are aloud to teach in school and what they are not aloud to teach, so many laws have been written and changed. In 1995 35 agencies representing 10 religions and ethical systems wrote “Religion in Public Schools” which was a joint statement of current laws stating that religions aloud to be taught in public schools, but only if it is serving an educational purpose.(----- http://www.religioustolerance.org/ps_bibl1.htm---------)
Personal ethical system We human beings live in a society. The society or the social world we live in is based on human cooperation. In other words, the individuals in a society do not live in an isolated self-centered world. The human interactive system presupposes ethical and moral standpoint from which we operate. My personal ethical system is based on “service before self” and “love your neighbors as yourself”. The question that I wish to address in context of these two principles of my personal
The ethical dilemma in this case focuses on a patrol officer’s decision on whether or not to pull over an influential member of society, the mayor. Several nights before, the mayor runs a red light causing the patrol officer to pull him over and issue a ticket. The next morning tension arises as the officer gets in trouble for issuing such a powerful person a mere traffic violation. Then later in the week, the same car is swerving all over the road. Should the policeman pull over someone he knows
philosophical study of the moral value of human conduct, and of the rules and principles it should govern. As a system, ethics are a social, religious, or civil code of behavior considered correct by a particular group, profession, or individual. As an instrument, ethics provide perspective regarding the moral fitness of a decision, course of action, or potential outcomes. Ethical decision-making can include many types, including deontological (duty), consequentialism (including utilitarianism)
teleological ethical systems can be considered ‘best’, from a variety of different viewpoints. A teleological ethical system is a consequentialist way of moral decision making, the key principles of a teleological system oppose those of a deontological system, a instead a teleological system does not look at actions as been wrong in themselves, and instead considers the consequences of these actions before deciding whether or not the act is morally permissible or not. Famous ethical theorists such
Utilitarianism is an ethical system that states that one should make moral choices based on which moral option brings the most pleasure and for the most people. This system is a consequentialist one, meaning that means or actions do not matter; only the consequences or results of one’s actions determine if the choice made was morally right or wrong. Actions and decisions can only be evaluated by the results they produce. If someone’s actions result in more pain than pleasure, then that action is
Ethical System Refection Introduction There are many ethical systems that were created over the years, each created to support curtain people’s beliefs, cultures, and ideologies. Out of all the systems that were presented in this course I believe that relativism and absolutism most aligns with my beliefs. Relativism is the fact that there is no absolute and that what is considered right and wrong varies from person to person and society to society. While absolutism “is the ethical belief that there
or society sets to govern their behaviors (Iqbal, Bhatti, & Zaheer, 2013). This definition is concomitant with the idea of knowing what is right and wrong and making a conscious decision to follow what is right (Paul & Elder, 2006). Conversely, a system of ethics is a set of instructions that govern an organization or particular social structure. This includes a combination of interrelated values that are devised as the most appropriate mode of conduct for a particular social structure (Paul & Elder
My Ethical System Every day, in a plethora of different situations, virtually every person has to make a multitude of decisions regarding how to interact with other people. Despite many centuries of intense study and theorizing by some of the most brilliant philosophers in the world, there is no single consensus on how people should choose to act towards others. What have been developed, however, are different systems of ethics describing idealized ideas of how human beings should treat themselves
When the internet was considered a global information system in 1995 millions of Americans participated in virtual communication. People began to communicate with each other and personal information began to be placed online by the stroke of the fingertips to their own computer. So the question is the privacy of individuals trusted online? Can people snoop around and see personal information? Of course people can if guidelines are not set in place to protect them. Public and private information
Given the choice between being judged under the teleological and deontological ethical systems most would choose the more lenient system. Teleological ethical systems can be seen as more forgiving than deontological ethical systems, because it believes that good is defined by results. Jeremy Bentham was a supporter of utilitarianism which is a type of teleological ethical system. Utilitarianism system focuses on the consequences of the action and how it positively affects everyone, opposed to negatively
My Ethical Systems All through my life, I have found and developed my own personal ethical system. Religious ethics and ethics of care are my most commonly used ethical systems in my life. These systems have both contributed to the making of my personal decisions, which led me to the person I am today. I combined both ethical systems as I matured; however I still rely on religious ethics as my basic foundation. I have used Ethics of Care from my previous job and will continue to use this system
Deontological moral systems are characterized by a focus upon adherence to independent moral rules or duties. To make the correct moral choices, we have to understand what our moral duties are and what correct rules exist to regulate those duties. When we follow our duty, we are behaving morally. When we fail to follow our duty, we are behaving immorally. Typically in any deontological system, our duties, rules, and obligations are determined by God. Being moral is thus a matter of obeying God. Deontological
The ethical system I have chosen is Virtue Ethics. Virtue ethics is a common term for an approach that lay emphasis on the role of character and quality in moral philosophy rather than one doing one’s duty or acting in order to bring good consequences. Most virtue ethics theories are inspired by Aristotle who stated that a virtuous individual is somebody who has ideal character qualities. These qualities come from natural internal tendencies, but need to be cultivated and once established they will
Similarly both attorneys and police officers face dilemmas that are entwined with their line of work. Two main comparable ethical dilemmas are personal gain and the abuse of power. Some attorneys deny the liberty or even the bail of some defendants, when it is reasonable, just because they want to. Certainly this leads to the ideal of abuse of power. Also, many attorneys receive “compensations, benefits, and pay-offs” in order to get someone off-the-hook or to speed up the case. Equally, police officers