Free Categorical Imperative Essays and Papers

Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Categorical Imperative

    • 1508 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Kant thinks that the basic moral principles of our society come from people’s rationality, and people must follow these principles unconditionally. These moral principles are the Categorical Imperative. Meanwhile, its common rules have different directions in society. To conclude these directions, it can be reflected from three different formulations. Among the three formulations, the first formulation of universal law has standout features in the maxim and the constraints about people’s behaviors

    • 1508 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant and the Categorical Imperative Kant tried to develop a theory of ethics which relied on reason rather than emotion. While he was not anti-religious, he wanted an ethical system which was not clouded by religion, emotion or personal interpretation. He placed emphasis on motives behind an action rather than, like the Utilitarians, the consequences of an action. He believed that consequences were no guide to whether an action was moral or not. His theory is known as deontological, or

    • 913 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    statements of the categorical imperative were some of Kant’s most important words. btannica.com says a categorical imperative is, “a moral law that is unconditional or absolute for all agents, the validity or claim of which does not depend on any ulterior motive or end” (britannica.com Categorical imperative par. 1). In other words, a categorical imperative is a moral “you ought to do this” no matter the circumstances. Let’s examine the 3 versions of the categorical imperative. The first version

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Categorical Imperative is a philosophical idea that has some important main ideas. The first one is that one must act as if the maxim that you are following is a universal law (if everyone else did it), secondly one must never treat a person as a way to achieve your goal. The idea of the Categorical Imperative was conceived by German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who lived from 1724 to 1804 (Rolff). Kant, famous for his other writings in metaphysics, aesthetics, and epistemology, was no amateur

    • 1426 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    hypothetical imperative, which dictates a given course of action to reach a specific end, and the categorical imperative, which dictates a course of action that must be followed because of its rightness and necessity. The categorical imperative is the basis of morality and was stated by Kant as "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through

    • 1380 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    look at the act in itself. In Kantian theory, the categorical imperative is a logical test that encompasses three formulations, but I will only discuss one. The consequence of using a person to benefit another is that we cause non-malfeasance to a healthy person to benefit an ill person (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 363). This act violates the principle respect for persons of the second means as an end formulation of the categorical imperative. In this formulation, we are to act by treating humans

    • 566 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All people have autonomy, and it is up to the individual to use their reason to act based on good will; “Kant believed that there was a supreme principle of morality, and he referred to it as The Categorical Imperative. The Categorical Imperatives determines what our moral duties are”. Humans have the moral duty to act simply for the right reasons. However, in the case of the U.S. Military killing terrorist without their knowledge, someone “up the ladder” decided that

    • 1084 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Categorical Imperatives

    • 1664 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For many years, the philosopher Immanuel Kant has argued for the existence of categorical imperatives. He defines categorical imperatives as rules that must be followed regardless of external circumstances, and that have content that is sufficient enough in and of itself to provide an agent with reason to act in a certain way. He is certain that moral rules fall under this label, and since his death, many of his followers have fought to support this claim. However, in 1972 a woman named Phillipa

    • 1664 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Categorical Imperative is a philosophical theory was developed by Kant in 1785. If someone does not know what is categorical imperative means, the term imperative in my own words means that you should do something. If you put the the two terms together, categorical imperative means that an unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person 's purpose.Basically, The Categorical Imperative is something that one should do, but not because it will benefit

    • 1316 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant was one of history’s greatest influential deontological philosophers that developed the idea of the Categorical Imperative. Deontology is viewed that some actions are morally permitted or forbidden regardless of the consequences. Believing the only thing intrinsic moral worth is the goodwill of others as well as self. Kant also believed that goodwill is not good because of what it affects or accomplishes nor because of its adequacy to achieve something in the proposed end (McKnight

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant makes the argument that one must always develop their natural talents in accordance with what he calls the categorical imperative. Although compelling, his argument is lacking in practicality and is not in accordance with a modern understanding of psychology and the human mind. Kant presents the argument that it is morally wrong for an individual to possess natural talents and not pursue them. To understand Kant’s argument about the pursuit

    • 1908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    being, should do the right thing regardless of the consequences of your actions. From the categorical imperative Kant created maxims (principles) which determine whether what one is doing is morally right or wrong. Some of these maxims include “One should not lie under any circumstances”, “Stealing and murder is wrong and immoral”, and “One should not bring harm to others”. In applying Kant’s categorical imperative to Luke’s situation the two maxims which holds the greatest relevance and applicability

    • 1265 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there are four formulations of Kant’s Categorical Imperative, two of them are relevant today. The first formulation is the Formula of Universal Law, which says, “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” (McCormick). This means that you are not allowed to do anything that you would not be willing to let everyone else do (McCormick). Also, that you are not allowed to make exceptions for yourself. That meaning that you cannot say

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    are: categorical moral imperative and consequentialism. In this essay, some background descriptions on each theory are provided, and I will provide justifications for using categorical moral imperatives. The categorical imperative is one of the central philosophical concepts that were developed by philosopher Immanuel Kant. Kant moral philosophy is deontological; it rests on the notion of duty or obligation from the Greek word ‘Deon’ (Kant, Immanuel). Kant formulated the categorical imperative in three

    • 1256 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    evaluate whether one’s actions are moral, we use many moral dilemmas. One of them is Kant’s categorical imperative. This essay presents Kant’s project of categorical imperative. Then, I will explain that rulers should appeal to Kant’s categorical imperative when making foreign policy decision. In order to support my point of view, I will give importance to the reasons of why rulers appeal to categorical imperative when making foreign policy, so I have two reasons for this. One of them is that states depend

    • 975 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    are two types of obligations. These two types of obligations are hypothetical imperatives and categorical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives essentially give instructions based on a person’s individual preference and vary for each situation, Categorical imperatives, unlike hypothetical imperatives, give commands/instructions that are to be applied regardless of personal preferences. One major categorical imperative states that an action is permissible if both

    • 798 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    the “Categorical Imperative”. The Categorical Imperative is essential in the exploration of morality in the rational being, and, as with morality, is dependent solely on reason alone. The Categorical Imperative, as illustrated by Kant, is an unconditional law of morality that must be obeyed in all circumstances, separate from condition or character. As such, the Categorical Imperative serves a supreme principle of morality in

    • 1796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    formulation of the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative is Kant's statement of a moral law, which should be followed by a rational being without any exceptions. The main premise of the this argument is that each rational being should be able to follow some type of higher law, which produces moral worth. Kant first wishes to provide a distinction between person and things, and this distinction is the basis for the second formulation of the categorical imperative. Moral worth determines

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Categorical Imperative and the Problem of Truth Kant’s argues that his Categorical Imperative (CI) or, more properly, his multiple versions of the CI are universal in the sense that they apply to everyone at all times. If the CI actually is universal in this sense, it fulfills one of the major traits necessary for a moral principle (Pojman 7). The vagueness of the CI, however, makes its universalizability hard to assess. To simplify the issue, this paper will examine Kant’s response to Benjamin

    • 942 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperatives are commands; they tell human beings what to do. Kant differentiated these two types of imperatives: categorical and hypothetical. A categorical imperative is an absolute and universal moral obligation; it tells us what to do regardless of our desires. On the other hand, hypothetical imperatives are neither universal nor absolute; instead they take the uncertain approach of "If you want to achieve this, you must perform this." Unlike categorical imperatives, they are dependent on our

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays