Right now animals in laboratories are getting burned, and injected with different medicines. These animals have feelings too, and they have emotions just like you and I. They are feeling pain, fear and many more in a small cage that they can’t even move around. Maybe hurting these animals is to help find medicines for different diseases and sicknesses but there are other solutions and different ways to find them other than hurting and abusing these animals with chemicals. 3.5 billion animals a year
used by humans, figuring out toxicity of medications, and many more biomedical, health care, and commercial uses (Hajar 2011). Animal testing dates as far back as ancient Greek times, physician-scientists like Aristotle and Erasistratus, had performed experiments on living animals, as did Ibn Zuhr, a physician in the twelfth century (Hajar 2011). Proponents of animal testing believe there are no alternative methods for research. Animal testing has enabled lifesaving treatments for humans and animals
the past, scientific advances have made these tests obsolete because better alternatives exist. Scientific research proves otherwise. The benefits of animal testing make it a positive force in society. Animal testing is a viable method of scientific research. First, animal testing has produced many helpful results in the past. Frankie Trull, the president of Foundation for Biomedical research, states that animal testing improves medicine in areas “from antibiotics to blood [transfusions], from dialysis
the cruel and inhumane treatment of animals when their data is of no use biologically. The alternative methods are out there and slowly gaining acceptance. Until we, the at risk public demand a change in policy, we will remain at the mercy of a biomedical community with a questionable agenda.
Comparative analysis of Helsinki declaration October 2013 compared to the 1996 version The Helsinki declaration 2013 compared to the one 1996 states that one of the reasons of biomedical research is to continuously evaluate medical interventions apart from the improvement of diagnosis and prevention of diseases which is also stated in the older version. In addition in the newest declaration the importance of final experimentation on human subjects is mentioned, whereas in the previous edition
Animal research has been around for several years. It is what helped discover so many cures for illnesses and saved over thousands of human lives. But is animal research ever justifiable? Several people believe that animal testing is cruel and shameful, but then there are those who believe it is necessary to humans well being. Animal testing is when procedures are performed on living animals for research purposes on biology and diseases that affect human beings. The point of animal testing is to
able to occur due to animal experimentation. Researchers have been able to save lives and improve the life expectancies for many that before were not thought to be possible. What some people do not seem to grasp is the fact that without animal-based research the well being of the world would be at risk, not only for humans but for animals too. However, laboratory animals need to be treated with care and respect. The number of animals should be kept at a minimum and used as a last resort if no other alternative
given harmful treatments. Animal research is experiments involving animals. Animals provide scientist with complex living systems consisting of cells, tissues, and organs. According to the Animal for Medical Progress, research animals are used to focus on treatment and prevention of diseases. II. Clinical Research Prior to 1906, there was no regulation regarding human use in research.
animals for certain anatomical studies (Franco, 2013). The dissection of the animals was and is called vivisection. The term vivisection can be viewed as the definition of animal testing for medical research since it is the practice of performing operations on living animals for experimentation and research (Franco, 2013). Some of the earliest physicians to perform vivisections include Alcmaeon during the 6th and 5th century BCE, Aristotle, Diocles and Praxagoras during the 4th century BCE, Erasistratus
treatment, however, who should be responsible for it? The Declaration of Helsinki, from 1924, was the first reference of ethical principles for medical research involving humans and it is the base for most of the ethical guidelines there are currently around the world2. Only in its sixth revision, in 2000, it included a declaration that all research subjects should have access to the treatment that had the benefits proved after the conclusion of the study3. In the last version, in the 34th paragraph