The website badvertising.com helps the naked eye read and see what should really be seen in advertisements by doctoring-up misleading ads to create a more accurate picture. To do this they physically cut and paste ads as well as manipulate them on the computer, in hope of changing your perceptions of the images every time you see a deceptive or misleading advertisement.
While many products and their advertisers are blatantly misleading the public with deliberately deceptive advertising, there is no more explicit example than the tobacco industry. Cigarette advertisers will never tell the truth and they can't because the truth is deadly to their consumer’s mindset as well as the health of the industry. So, instead of telling the truth to its consumers, they promise pleasure, fun, and social status. In addition, their so called “peaceful images” are not criticized because they are seen as non-provocative and non-offensive.
Television and movies since the 1920’s have been creating the illusion that smoking is an acceptable activity since everybody else is doing it. Children today, have no idea how or why they are getting the idea that smoking is cool. Without some kind of rude awakening, they will grow up to be addicted adults and could possibly develop various forms of deadly cancers along with emphysema. Eventhough tobacco...
... middle of paper ...
...ments to consist of black text on a white background, but the constitutionality of that requirement has come under scrutiny.
I can’t help but wonder, how can people so selfish to have a drive to promoting a product that kills people. How can someone with a conscience live with themselves, when they know they are killing 5.4 million people a year? Just a fun fact Tobacco use will kill 1 billion people in the 21st century if current smoking trends continue. Isn’t ironic how these despicable people have been forced to counter-advertise against themselves, with advertisement that show the truth about their products? Maybe these companies should have thought about what could have happened with their drug when fatalities occurred before they branched out to so many innocent people. These companies are murders plain and simple. They need to be brought to justice.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The use of tobacco has been linked to many diseases. On every cigarette pack sold in the United States, there is a warning which indicates the potential for adverse heath effects from smoking cigarettes. Among these effects are low birth weights for pregnant women, emphysema, and cancer. This is evidenced by numerous studies. The smoking population in India are not immune. In order to curb the public costs of caring for individuals who have been affected by smoking, legislators in India decided to craft a bill which prohibited tobacco companies from advertising and the sponsorship of athletic and cultural events.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Tobacco industry]
1079 words (3.1 pages)
- Summarize the arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising in India Part of the ban on tobacco was based on the "need to protect public health". Cigarettes are not in the best interest of the public, on the contrary they provoke high risk in serious or lethal illness. Also, there was a difference of 0.07% between the contribution (to the G.D.P) of cigarettes and the costs related to health care. The objective of the banning tobacco advertisements was to invert these results so that the health care costs would be reduced in the G.D.P as cigarette sales would decrease at the same time.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Nicotine]
919 words (2.6 pages)
- Introduction Tobacco advertising refers to promotion display of tobacco products in media such as; radio, television, print, billboards and at retail stores. The ban on tobacco advertising by the Indian Government has many effects on the people as well as their ethics and freedom of choice. This paper will provide a summary argument in favour of the ban as well as opposing the ban. And to conclude with my opinions on what the government should do with tobacco advertising. 1. Summarize the arguments in favour of the ban on tobacco advertising in India Smoking kills.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Cigarette]
986 words (2.8 pages)
- .Summarize the arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising in India. After reading the case the main arguments in favor of the tobacco advertisement ban are the following: Regarding the legal aspect, the government has international precedents that support his decision of banning the tobacco advertisement: courts of Belgium and France have endorsed the decision of banning the advertisements saying that the ban wasn 't unconstitutional and it was looking for the protection of the citizens ' health.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Advertising]
1162 words (3.3 pages)
- The government of India has many arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising. One of the arguments is the right of the government to step in and promote a healthier lifestyle. Many of the tobacco advertising companies stated that the ban on advertising was unconstitutional, but the supreme court in Belgium and France both agreed that the ban was not unconstitutional and was needed the ensure the public health. In 1990 tobacco attributed to over 3 million deaths and escalated to 4.023 million deaths in 1998.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Nicotine]
885 words (2.5 pages)
- Tobacco advertising bans have become commonplace in developed nations but are less prevalent in developing countries. The importance of advertising bans as part of comprehensive tobacco control strategies has been emphasized by the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control which calls for comprehensive bans on tobacco advertising. The empirical literature suggests that comprehensive advertising bans have played a role in reducing consumption in developed countries but that limited policies have not.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Cigarette]
1215 words (3.5 pages)
- Arguments in favour of the ban on tobacco advertising in India are based on international precedents as other countries like France, Finland and Norway had already imposed similar bans. With regards to the constitutionality of the ban on advertising as violation of citizens ' private lives the argument was that the government had the right to intervene in then overall interest of the citizens and the need to protect public health just as drugs like cocaine had been banned the world over. Statistics on tobacco related deaths according to the World Health Organisation and the expected rise also counted in favour of the ban.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Cigarette]
724 words (2.1 pages)
- Tobacco Advertising: To Ban or Not to Ban. Tobacco is a 100 percent legal substance that some want banned altogether.Tobacco has been a controversial substance ever since doctors found that it causes health problems, but the problem does not lie with the substance. Many people choose to smoke even with though the majority of studies prove that smoking is unhealthy. There is a fine line between tobacco companies selling their product and forcing it into the publics mouths when it is clear that many are more than willing to pay for tobacco.... [tags: Tobacco, Nicotine, Tobacco advertising]
1468 words (4.2 pages)
- In February of 2001 the Government of India decided to put forward a bill, that if passed had the potential to have a major impact on the advertising abilities of Tobacco companies. The bill included a ban from advertising products, as well as sponsorships of sporting and cultural events. The reasoning behind the bill was to help the government stop tobacco companies from targeting a new generation of Indian youth, and to provide a launching point for a government led anti-Tobacco program. This report analyzes the ICMR case study on the “Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India”, found at, http://www.icmrindia.org/free%20resources/casestudies/ban-tobacco-ads11.htm.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Tobacco industry]
1239 words (3.5 pages)
- The banning of tobacco advertising in India, in 2001, caused a debate over the ethical implications of such a ban. With expected economic, social and political ramifications, banning tobacco advertising created a series of arguments both for and against. From analyzing the case study, those who supported the ban, suggested that banning tobacco advertising was necessary for the “overall interest of the citizens” (Indian Tobacco Company Philip Morris, 2001). With the increase in knowledge and science, we now understand the harmfulness of tobacco consumption compared to fifty years ago when the effects were less understood.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Tobacco industry]
1107 words (3.2 pages)