To What Extent is an Eyewitness Testimony Credible and Therefore be Used in Court?

1728 Words4 Pages

Introduction

Scholars and practitioners alike share a widespread belief that the single greatest cause of wrongful conviction is because of an eyewitness testimony. April 23, 2007, marked the 200th criminal conviction exonerated by DNA evidence in the United States of America. According to www.innocenceproject.org, over 75% of the 200 criminal cases revealed to be wrongful convictions involved a faulty eyewitness testimony. Collectively, these 200 people spent a total of 2,475 years in prison. With factors such as witness memory, dependability, deception, and the outside influences one may encounter, psychologists and practitioners have begun to dispute whether or not an eyewitness is credible and therefore should be used in a legal court of law. In January of 2012 the Supreme Court reconsidered the use of eyewitness identification in court and in an 8 to 1 vote, court justices decided to change nothing. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote “There is no reason for the court to change its view that judges on their own cannot throw out eyewitness testimony unless police have manipulated circumstances to produce a desired outcome.” (Barnes 2012) Which begs the question that if the Supreme Court accepts eyewitness identification routinely, then is it credible? In this paper we’re going to explore eyewitness testimonies and their fallibilities, which lead to the conclusion that they should not be used in court.

Memory

We first start off by determining how we know that a testimony is credible. With many factors involved, such as a person’s disability, knowledge, and personal circumstances, eyewitnesses have a lot of easy influence over their testimony or identification, making it difficult to decide whether or not it is credible. Let’s...

... middle of paper ...

...Identification. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.questiaschool.com

Desmarais, S., & Yarmey, D. (2004). Judgments of Deception and Accuracy of Performance in Eyewitness Testimony. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.questiaschool.com

Arkowitz, H., & Lilienfeld, S. (2009, January 8). Why Science Tells Us Not to Rely on Eyewitness Accounts. Scientific American Global RSS. Retrieved May 21, 2014, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/

Blackmon, D. (2012, September 28). Louisiana death-row inmate Damon Thibodeaux exonerated with DNA evidence. Washington Post. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/louisiana-death-row-inmate-damon-thibodeaux-is-exonerated-with-dna-evidence/2012/09/28/26e30012-0997-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_story.html

Open Document