Helfand, Ira, Antti Junkari, and Ogebe Onazi. “Nuclear War: A Greater Threat than Ebola.” World Medical Journal. Vol. 61. Issue 1. Apr. 2015 Web. 2 Oct. 2015.
This journal explains the dangers of a nuclear war. The authors write about the threat of nuclear weapons. The writers began by stating that the medical community cannot support all of civilization if a nuclear war begins. There are over 17,000 nuclear weapons in the world. Even with the high amount of nuclear weapons, that are even stronger than the bombs that were dropped onto Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the nuclear threat is mainly ignored (Helfand, Antti, & Ogebe 14). The journal moves on to describe all of the possible dangers that would occur if a nuclear war starts. The authors refer to different dangers such as immediate deaths, starvation of the human race, and the catastrophic affect on the planet’s climate. The ending segment of the article refers to the many ways that the medical community can help the world avoid a nuclear war.
The journal is very clear and to the point. The authors add great detail when discussing the dangers of a nuclear war that causes many readers to feel worried about the issue. This works to writers’ advantage because the writers want readers to realize that we have to do something fast to avoid nuclear wars and potentially to save both our planet and ourselves. I completely agree with the authors’ position on how the people should handle the nuclear threat. I believe that nuclear weapons should be banned because they can cause more destruction then anyone could plan for.
I will use this source to depict all of the effects of the nuclear war. The ways that the medical community can hel...
... middle of paper ...
...different types of buildings that can be better protected against atom bombs. These buildings are fire-resistive buildings, industrial buildings with unprotected steel frames, masonry wall-bearing structures with wood floors and partitions, and wood-frame buildings (Bond 339)
This is another source with a different perspective on how to deal with atomic bombs and nuclear weapons. The protection of buildings is a good step towards protecting people from nuclear weapons. I still think that nuclear wars will still be to devastating for the world and that nuclear weapons should simply be banned from the world.
I will use the source to provide another perspective on ways to protect people against nuclear wars. I will include the type of protection that buildings need with different variations and a brief history of the atomic fires that were included in this journal.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the international Court, the UN believes that as far as the use of force goes, “All nations shall refrain form the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state”. States must seek out every alternative to war, and if none come to fruition, it is still not an excuse for violence. In this paper, the history of the development and uses of the nuclear bomb, as well as doctrines and scholarly writings on the subject will serve as a deterrent to the future use of any nuclear weapons in conflicts between states.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, Nuclear proliferation]
1343 words (3.8 pages)
- In 2 Corinthians 10:4, Paul says, “For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds.” Since the beginning, humans have built and carried weapons to protect and defend themselves and their families. As the bible verse above says, weapons come as a power from God and are not of this world; however, is it possible that we have gotten to the point where we use these gifts from God in an unjust way. Nuclear weapons have become one of the best-kept worldwide secrets since 1945.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, World War II]
1014 words (2.9 pages)
- While most people are scared of the devastation caused by nuclear weapons, they do keep the world safe. The fear caused by such weapons actually keeps countries closer to peace. When nations come into conflict they keep it minimal as they are scared to cross boundaries and have a nuclear strike. Countries out there are always going to have nuclear weapons, so the United States must keep them so others are to scared to have us retaliate. Some scientist believes that we might need them other than war, such as to stop a meteor from hitting the earth.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, World War II, Nuclear warfare]
741 words (2.1 pages)
- The United States is currently spending $35 Billion a year; which is 14% of the defense budget, or it is $96 million a day, because of the nuclear efforts of which about $25 million goes for operation and maintenance for the nuclear arsenal. The rest of the money is spent on cleanup, arms control verification, and ballistic missile research, which all of that, just adds to the cost greatly. President Obama revealed a budget that includes more than $220 million in cuts for nuclear security programs in the next fiscal year.... [tags: terrorists, nuclear and radioactive materials]
1400 words (4 pages)
- Nuclear weapons possess enormous destruction power from their nuclear fission. They have only been used twice in this history of mankind and that was during World War II in the Pacific campaign, instead of invading Japans mainland President Truman decided to drop atomic bombs on two Japanese cities and ask for their surrender. After the second bomb was dropped Japan had surrendered and the war was over. Nuclear weapons have in pros and cons, but without nuclear bombs we wouldn’t know nearly as much as we know today about radiation and things of that nature.... [tags: Nuclear weapon, World War II]
1277 words (3.6 pages)
- Invasion To wage war means both to kill the innocent and to allow oneself to be innocently killed. . . (Einstein, 2010). Wars have been a part of human culture for so long, that the aforementioned has become a part of the human genealogy. It seems as if human beings do not acknowledge other ways of communicating their differences and creating solutions that would benefit all stakeholders. In most instances, the stronger, more powerful countries take the battle to their adversaries, and one war always leads to another.... [tags: Iraq War, 2003 invasion of Iraq, Iraq]
1107 words (3.2 pages)
- Though nuclear weapons cause a lot of problems like cost to make and secure them, the amount of civilian casualties they cause, and the long term effects to people’s health and countries’ economies. There are benefits to these weapons, the question is do these benefits outweigh the negatives. Ever since nuclear weapons have gained media attention they have been subject to debate, and some of the most well-known supporters of nuclear weapons have been Presidents Truman, Reagan, and Kennedy and researcher Kenneth Waltz who presented an argument supporting the spread nuclear weapons in his monograph “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons” written in 1981.... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1480 words (4.2 pages)
- Nuclear weapons are the only remaining weapons that are allowed to be used for mass destruction. This weapon could do its job from being launched 50 million away from where they want it to land. Currently, there are around 15,000 nuclear warheads in the world, 7,300 of them being in Russia and around 7,000 in the U.S. and the rest being located in countries like china, Japan, Pakistan, India, united Kingdom, France and Israel. All these countries use these powerful weapons as a great source of security for their country.... [tags: Nuclear weapon]
1047 words (3 pages)
- The debate that nuclear weapons kept the peace through mutually assured destruction is still quite controversial. Though some historians do not believe this. Eric Hobsbawm states this, “both sides thus found themselves committed to an insane arms race to mutual destruction.” The interpretations A, B, C, D both agree and disagree with this point and each historian has their on views and there own views. Interpretation A and D disagreed with the question however also had a different view and since it was more revisionist blamed America.... [tags: Cold War, Nuclear weapon, World War II]
1828 words (5.2 pages)
- Nuclear Proliferation Andrew Jackson’s farewell address to the nation, he stated, “We shall more certainly preserve peace when it is well understood that we are prepared for war,” (Political Quotations #3719). The United States has always throughout history been a major military power from the use of abnormal tactics during the Revolutionary War (1776) to the use of its technology and advanced weapons in the Persian Gulf War (1991). After World War II and the Cold War Era, the United States has been able to defend its citizens from any form of a military attack from the sea, air, and the ground on the eastern and western seaboards.... [tags: War Nuclear Weapons Distruction Essays]
1501 words (4.3 pages)