Essay PreviewMore ↓
The first major difference I noticed was in the cinematography. In the original, Jewison used techniques that were new to the industry at the time. He used a split screen technique to enhance the action scenes by allowing for more than one point of view, giving the movie more suspense. However, in the remake, McTiernan chose not to use this technique or even any other that is newer to film making. Mctiernan's makes it easier for the viewer to follow the plot and focus in on what is going on in the movie. In doing this, the remake loses some of the intensity in it's action and suspense scenes.
Along the same lines, the remake makes it easier for the viewer to know more about what is going on by showing more of both sides of the story than the original. There is more mystery in the original because although Jewison gives the viewer all the pieces to the puzzle, he makes them put the story together themselves. McTiernan's version "connects the dots" for the viewer thus allowing them to better understand what is going on.
McTiernan did this to make the film more viewer accessible because this was the film audience of the time.
How to Cite this Page
"Thomas Crown Affair." 123HelpMe.com. 23 Feb 2020
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Thomas Malory’s Le Morte Darthur and Monty Python and the Holy Grail Professor’s comment: This student uses a feminist approach to shift our value judgment of two works in a surprisingly thought-provoking way. After showing how female seduction in Malory’s story of King Arthur is crucial to the story as a whole, the student follows with an equally serious analysis of Monty Python’s parody of the female seduction motif in what may be the most memorable and hilarious episode of the film. Much of the humor in Monty Python and the Holy Grail derives from the pure absurdity of its characters and situations.... [tags: Movie Film Essays]
2206 words (6.3 pages)
- The Death of Indian Culture Exposed in The Jewel In the Crown The Jewel in the Crown, by Paul Scott, is a postcolonial novel about the realism of the interracial love affair between Daphne Manners and Hari Kumar, the subsequent rape of Daphne Manners, and the after effects on British and Indian relations. At a time when British and Indian affairs were strained, at best, the rape of Miss Manners is significantly metaphoric of the British rape of Indian land and culture. British colonial sentiment became a primary influence in India, when the revolt of 1857 led to the reorganization of British influence.... [tags: Jewel in the Crown Essays]
1324 words (3.8 pages)
- Movies Serendipity and An Affair to Remember Can once in a lifetime happen twice. Can two people get a second chance at love. While reality more than likely suggests no, some movies would suggest otherwise. The films An Affair to Remember and Serendipity are only two examples of how society depicts romance as an exaggerated fabrication of reality only to have a negative effect on its viewers. Both films share the storyline of two lovers who separate, only hoping that fate will bring them back together As the film Serendipity begins, Sara Thomas and Jonathon Trager meet each other for the first time at Bloomingdale’s.... [tags: Serendipity Affair Movie Film Essays]
934 words (2.7 pages)
- Iran-contra affair is the name of a major United States foreign policy scandal in the 1980's. It involved two secret operations by the executive branch of the government. The operations were (1) the sale of military equipment to Iran, an enemy of the United States; and (2) the provision of military aid to contra rebels in Nicaragua, which Congress had banned. The two operations were connected by the use of profits from the Iranian arms sales to aid the contra rebels. Background. In 1979, a political coalition called the Sandinistas led a revolution in Nicaragua and took control of the government.... [tags: Iran-contra Affair Essays]
753 words (2.2 pages)
- The Jewel in the Crown : Daphne Manners Daphne Manners was a woman that was ahead of her time she was not prejudice in a hateful way. The prejudice she had was purely ignorance of the day and age. She did not dislike someone just because they were Indian. Daphne Manners even made negative comments about the prejudices that she saw happening. She ignored the social norms when she started falling for Hari Kumar. Had Miss Manners followed the standards for the day and age of the story she would never had given Hari a second look.... [tags: Jewel in the Crown Essays]
567 words (1.6 pages)
- Historical Context of The Jewel in the Crown The historical context of Paul Scott's novel - The Jewel in the Crown - serves to explain and interpret a tragic love story between two characters; Daphne Manners and Hari Kumar. The love story serves to clarify and interpret the social/racial and historical significance of the time period in which it is set - 1942. Their love - a product as well as a victim of the time and events - is an allegory for the relationship between England and India - the White man and the Black man.... [tags: Jewel in the Crown Essays]
786 words (2.2 pages)
- Thomas Jefferson and John Adams are two of the United States most iconic historical figures when discussing the long and eventful history of American politics. While many Americans can easily point to George Washington as our founding father, his ideas of government and how the new American political system should function were critical in guiding the colonies towards independence and establishing their own government. However, many of his criticisms and oppositions to the methods in which powerful men used to control the masses became a part of the new system as well.... [tags: Thomas Jefferson, John Adams]
1479 words (4.2 pages)
- A Reflection of Life, Seen Through Deaths Eyes “Dylan Marlais Thomas was born October 27, 1914, in Swansea, South Wales” (Dylan Thomas 1). His father David John Thomas had a huge influence on his life from a young age. David was an English Literature professor and “would often recite Shakespeare” (Dylan Thomas 1) to Thomas. Poetry became a passion for Thomas and he would spend much of his childhood reading poems from his favorite artist. He looked up to poets such as “Gerald Manley Hopkins, W.B.... [tags: Dylan Thomas, White Horse Tavern, Hotel Chelsea]
1666 words (4.8 pages)
- Lewis Thomas' The Lives of a Cell The Lives of a Cell: Notes of a Biology Watcher by Lewis Thomas consists of short, insightful essays that offer the reader a different perspective on the world and on ourselves. The book draws its name from the first essay, "The Lives of a Cell," in which Thomas offers his observations on ecology and the role of cellular activity. He writes that the "uniformity of the earth's life, more astonishing then its diversity, is accountable by the high probability that we derived, originally, from some single cell, fertilized in a bolt of lightning as the earth cooled" (3).... [tags: Thomas Lives Cell Book Review]
1238 words (3.5 pages)
- Thomas Paine For many years Thomas Paine was the epitome of American histories greatest drawback. In American history there is always that one detail that doesn’t make it into popular curriculum. Whether it be the point of view from the loosing side of a war, to the secret dalliances of a popular politician, to the truth of a times social opinion- the American student is taught only so much. The most proper, popular material makes it in; along with any major facts too commonly known to ignore.... [tags: History Historical Thomas Paine Essays]
1429 words (4.1 pages)
Another difference in the two films involves the political environment and culture differences between the late 60's and late 90's. As we are well aware smoking was much more widely accepted in decades past, and this can be seen in how both of the main characters in the original smoke cigarettes. Other than Crown's celabetory cigar after a smart business move, Mctiernan left out the characteristic of smoking in the remake. McTiernan's choice to do this was to conform character's to the 90's idea of the uberwealthy financer and suave high class investigator.
The second change I saw relating to the difference in political environment of the times was in the reasons why Thomas Crown chooses to break the law. In the original Crown dvelopes and executes a plan to rob a bank. Although he does it to see if he can pull it off, he also does it because he feels as though it is "him against the "system" and this is a way for to fight against it. This was making a statement about how the people in the late 60's felt about the government and its actions, mainly about the Vietnam War, and also is giving reference to civil rights. However in the remake, Crown steals a priceless painting from the Metropolitan museum of art because he only finds excitement in attaining the unattainable. McTiernan chose not to include this type of statement not because there were no wars, but because as a director he had been walking on thin ice after some of his films were relatively unsuccessful, and so he was unwilling to risk being rejected by viewers for being to critical of the government.
In the original, Jewison portrayed Crown as sporty and sophisticated through activities. He expertly plays polo, is passionate and skillful at playing chess, and even takes Anderson up flying in a glider plane. Similar to the original, Crown takes Banning flying in a glider, but in the remake McTiernan includes scenes which portray a different Crown. In one scene Crown endangers his life in a sailing race by wrecking an expensive Hurricane catamaran when he tries to pass the leading boat because he does a stupid dangerous move which capsizes the boat. When he is picked up out of the cold water by a yacht, it is apparent that he does not care what happened because he seems unphased by it and has on a smile. In another scene Crown is playing golf and hits a ball close to the hole from a sand trap. When another player says "A thousand bucks says you can't do that again." He puts another ball down and gives the other player 10 to 1 odds. He misses the shot, and then says he'll go double or nothing making it a $100k bet. When the other player asks Crown if he is sure he wants to, Crown replies "What the hell else do we have to do today?" And misses the shot.
In changing these activities from the original's to the modern day belief of what an adventure sport is, McTiernan allows the viewer to better understand that his Crown has lost almost all interest in things he can attain. It is obvious that McTiernan made the changes to better emphasize to the viewer the dire boredom Crown suffers through his living more recklessly, both with his life and his money-- just so he can get a momentary change from the normal.
Throughout the original, the lighting in the movie is low which can be blamed on more than just the film quality of the time. Jewison does this to better encapsulate the viewer into Crown's world that is dull and boring. However in the remake, McTiernan mainly keeps the lighting very bright as if it were always a bright sunny day. He chooses to use the bright light to apply somewhat of the same normality shown in the original. But different than the original, he uses this normality to set a tone so that a change in the lighting can be more distinctly seen. This can be seen in the low lighting that is used in the scene when banning is walking down the street in the rain, crying because she thinks Crown has used her and is cheating on her. McTiernan uses the change in lighting to better emphasize to the viewer a characters emotion. In doing this McTiernan is able to provide the viewer with an additional aspect, albeit an esthetic aspect, of the story.
In McTiernan's the movie, he chose to include an additional theme that centers around fine art, a Monet in particular. McTiernan weaves this theme of art throughout various scenes in the play. For instance, Bannon breaks into Crowns house and thinks she finds the stolen painting. But when the police try to authenticate it, they find that it is a fake because it is painted over a portrait of dogs playing poker. There are also various scenes like a ceremony where Crown donates a painting to the museum until it is recovered; or on a trip where Crown takes Bannon to an island with a mysterious painting in a box that is shrouded throughout the trip until she burns it. McTiernan uses the theme of art not only as part of the premice of the story, but also as most of the body of the story.
At the ending of both movies lies the main difference between the original and remake. In the original, Crown asks Anderson to come away with him, but instead stands her up and has someone give her the stolen money. Crown does this because he is one step ahead of her and knows that she will betray him. However, in the remake Crown does almost the same thing by standing Bannon up and leaving her the newly stolen piece of art also. But McTiernan doesn't cut the viewer off here, he instead has Bannon board a flight back to Europe, and when she starts crying over Crown, he elegantly hands her a handkerchief and tells her not to worry. McTiernan added this part to the movie because he not only felt that it flowed more with the connection he made between Crown and Bannon, but he also thought that the viewers of the original version needed to have some sort of closure.
Both the original and the remake of the Thomas crown affair were excellent movies. But all in all I found that the Jewison's original intrigued me more than McTeirnan's retelling. While the remake was more intense in action, it didn't give my mind anything more to think about other than just imagining myself in his shoes. It also didn't leave the ending open for me to imagine what happens to the two counterparts. The original allowed myself to guess what was going to happen next, while still staying one step ahead of me. So if you like action movies than see the remake. but if you like mystery's more, than see the original cause Steve McQueen rocks. Thank you