Nature of science or NOS is a term that refers to the epistemic knowledge of science, the knowledge of constructs and values that are intrinsic to the subject. The constructs and values include historical groundwork to scientific discovery and social incorporation such as sociology, philosophy, and history of science (“Nature of Science”). Nature of science, in my opinion, should not be explicitly taught in high school science curriculum. The basis for my standing on the issue is representative of the lack of a fundamental standard understanding of what Nature of Science is, as well as the lack of effectiveness in explicitly teaching Nature of Science which I will expand on further in this paper. The breakdown for my position in this paper is based on: a background of Nature of Science and what it incorporates including assumptions and biases, and studies conducted towards teaching Nature of Science and outcomes.
Nature of Science would be useful to integrate into curriculum if it wasn’t so difficult to do so and if it wasn’t done explicitly. When integrating Nature of Science into curriculum, assumptions are made about students and instructors. These assumptions include that students are all at the same level in terms of science understanding and concepts as the rest of their classmates, and also assumes that the students learn at the same rates (NGSS: Appendix A). These assumptions are detrimental to science education when focus needs to be on the content being taught rather than teaching background of science as a standalone. Teaching NOS explicitly becomes increasingly difficult when students aren’t given access to proper science learning environments. As mentioned in th...
... middle of paper ...
...ually unchanged ideas in multiple students suggests that current standards and practices are more than sufficient in teaching science fundamentals as well as science from a literacy and humanistic approach. Essentially, without a further developed background and curricula for NOS, teaching it explicitly is destined to fail, several studies have displayed just that.
Nature of Science is a crucial tool to better understand nuanced scientific concepts. The lack of a fundamental understanding or agreement as to what NOS incorporates is why NOS has not shown the results it should be showing in terms of scientific assessment. Students have to have a better basis for early scientific concepts as well as teachers need lesson plans to effectively teach NOS concepts. Without further development, I believe NOS should not be explicitly taught in high school science curriculum.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Charles Darwin was a scientist and naturalist, primarily recognised as the first and most influential advocate of the evolutionary theory through natural selection. After the publication of his book in 1859, “On the Origin of Species”, people began to identify the foundations of humanity very differently. However, even though the scientific approval of his theory was close to becoming worldwide, there have been countless opposition groups, predominantly amongst the religious believers. (Darwin, 2008) According to Darwin, the relationship between science and religion is commonly represented as an issue that is irreconcilable where one side is claiming something, the other can’t accept;... [tags: theory, natuarl, science, religion]
1780 words (5.1 pages)
- Social science theory provides the social work practitioner methods with which to understand subjects, be it an individual, family, organization, or greater society. Two related theoretical viewpoints that have received significant attention from the research community and practitioners alike are systems theory and the ecological perspective. Both give techniques to analyze a subject in the context of its environment. In this paper, the author contends that concepts from each theory are useful in considering a case vignette involving Emma, a six year old victim of sexual abuse from a deteriorating family unit.... [tags: Sociology, Systems theory, Social work, Psychology]
2147 words (6.1 pages)
- Functionalism is a social science theory which identifies; all aspects within a society have meaning (Britannica Academic, 2016.) Its main focus being on how different factors of society function to maintain the social equilibrium (Germov, 2014.) Between the years 1921-1968 theorist Max Webber paved the way for Weberianism in relation to health sociology. He believed that people can influence their own lives and alter the society they live in (Germov, 2014). This essay will delve into these theories by comparing and contrasting functionalism and weberianism.... [tags: Sociology, Max Weber, Suicide, Medicine]
1534 words (4.4 pages)
- Position Paper: Teaching NOS in High School Curriculum Nature of science or NOS is a term that refers to the epistemic knowledge of science, the knowledge of constructs and values that are intrinsic to the subject. The constructs and values include historical groundwork to scientific discovery and social incorporation such as sociology, philosophy, and history of science (“Nature of Science”). Nature of science, in my opinion, should not be explicitly taught in high school science curriculum. The basis for my standing on the issue is representative of the lack of a fundamental standard understanding of what Nature of Science is, as well as the lack of effectiveness in explicitly teaching Na... [tags: Education, Scientific method, Curriculum, Science]
928 words (2.7 pages)
- 1 Planning – By deciding exact numbers such as 3 envelopes a minute or 8,500 strokes an hour, he planned the task that his employees must do. Organizing – He established authority relationship to achieve his goal effectively by setting supervisors. His Employees felt pressure because of supervisors, and they tried to work hardly. Leading – He decided rules to achieve his goals smoothly. For example, talking is forbidden or the windows are covered. He hoped that his employees concentrated their tasks.... [tags: Management, Control, Scientific management]
1020 words (2.9 pages)
- Before understanding how psychology is considered a science, one must understand how the basic foundations of science itself works. The purpose of science is to find logical explanations of natural phenomena rather than a simple, seemingly obvious answer. Another thing to acknowledge is the idea that science is exceedingly complex. Contrary to popular belief, science cannot be condensed into a strict linear process due to its tentative nature. Moreover, there are features of science that must be met in order to find valuable information after studying or observing the object that is being investigated.... [tags: Scientific method, Science, Theory]
1410 words (4 pages)
- When it comes to the word ‘science’ most of the people have some kind of knowledge about science or when they think of it there is some kind of image related to science, a theory, scientific words or scientific research, many different sorts of ideas float into an individual’s mind. Every individual has a different perception about science and how he/she perceives it. This illustrates that each individual can identify science in some sort of form. This indicates that science plays a vital role in our everyday lives (Lederman & Tobin, 2002).... [tags: Scientific method, Theory, Science, Pseudoscience]
1482 words (4.2 pages)
- Is Psychology a Science. Psychology is commonly defined as 'scientific ' study of human behavior and cognitive processes. Broadly speaking the discussion focuses on the different branches of psychology, and if they are indeed scientific. However, it is integral in this to debate to understand exactly the major features of a science, in order to judge if psychology is in fact one. There must be a definable subject matter - this changed from conscious human thought to human and non-human behavior, then to cognitive processes within psychology 's first eighty years as a separate discipline.... [tags: Scientific method, Psychology, Science, Theory]
1271 words (3.6 pages)
- Is psychology a Science. To answer this question we must first look at what psychology is. Gregory Feist and Erika Rosenberg (2012) defines psychology to be “the scientific study of thought and behavior.”(P. 5). Psychologists study why a person feels, thinks, and acts the way they do. Psychology is two fold. There is the well known clinical side, in which disorders are diagnosed and treated. The other side is the little known scientific psychological, which uses the scientific method to test psychological theories.... [tags: Psychology, Scientific method, Science, Theory]
1033 words (3 pages)
- Toulmin, Hull, Campbell, and Popper have defended an "Evolutionary-Analogy" view of scientific evaluative practice. In this view, competing concepts, theories and methods of inquiry engage in a competitive struggle from which the "best adapted" emerge victorious. Whether applications of this analogy contribute to our understanding of science depends on the importance accorded the disanalogies between natural selection theory and scientific inquiry. Michael Ruse has suggested instead an "Evolutionary-Origins" view of scientific evaluative practices in which scientific inquiry is directed by application of epigenetic rules that have become encoded in homo sapiens in the course of evolutionary... [tags: Natural Selection, Evolution Essays]
4356 words (12.4 pages)