Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Success and challenges of the Kyoto protocol
Climate change and its impacts
Success and challenges of the Kyoto protocol
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Success and challenges of the Kyoto protocol
The World’s Reaction to the Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol
In this day and age, it has become very easy to take advantage of the seemingly never ending natural resources, and current amenities which our society and scientific endeavors have made possible. However, what many fail to realize, is that on a daily basis, our luxuries are emitting Greenhouse gases into the world, and using up precious resources. While the exact date of when these will truly cause drastic results in our world in unknown, nations are finally starting to realize that actions need to be taken, in order to protect as much as we can. A good start to this was the creation of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, which calls for nations to have a 5% cut in Greenhouse gas emissions between 2008 and 2012, from their levels in 1990. Just last week, on February 16, 2005, this Protocol went into affect. Like most political agreements, however, there has been much praise and criticism for this act. Originally, 84 countries signed the Protocol, indicating that they would later ratify the Protocol. However, not all of the countries have actually signed it. This is due to the details of the actual Protocol, being different than what the countries previously expected them to be. Many countries who have stated their lack of commitment to the Protocol, including the United States, have come under much criticism world wide.
There are several reasons why countries have decided not to comply with the Kyoto Protocol. Among the biggest conflicts is the eminent economic affect it will have on large, industrial nations, such as the United States. According to the online Harvard Magazine, “Harvard scientists and economists who study climate change express...
... middle of paper ...
...ds to put some serious energy into reconstructing how we go about the usage of our energy and how to minimize gas emissions. While the time limit of the Kyoto Protocol is unrealistic for the United States, immediate changes do need to be made. Actions such as encouraging the use of hybrid cars, or increasing tax incentives to businesses and home that are more environmentally friendly would be a great place to start. We share the world with many; no matter how we choose to go about it, we all need to do our part to conserve the Earth.
Works Cited
“Bush Statements and Reactions.” ECEEE. .
Landler, Mark. “Kyoto Treaty on Greenhouse Gases takes Affect.” New York Times. 16
February 2005. .
“Problems with the Protocol.” The Harvard Magazine. .
UNFCC. .
Stern, Nicholas. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print.
At the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992, many countries wished to have legally binding limits on greenhouse gas emissions to be included in the summit, but the United States of America refused to agree because it claimed that there were still scientific uncertainties regarding the need to take action in limiting gas emission. Besides, since limiting gas emissions will cutting energy consumption, it will give unacceptable economic impacts. Since the United States is one of the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, so it was very important that the United States signed the convention, where to ensure that the United States get on the board, the more progressive countries were forced to compromise their positions. So, as a result, the final treaty, known as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), only included the ambiguous and legally weak ‘aim’ that requiring the industrialized countries (listed in Annex I of the Convention) to cut down their greenhouse gas
The first step is providing education to everyone about global warming, the next step is to give incentives for people to participate in counteracting global warming, and the last step is to insure lasting change by creating and enforcing laws that will help the environment. By looking at this process it is clear that global warming will not be counteracted unless everyone gets involved and it is made a public issue. It is also clear that global warming is natural and will occur no matter what, it is just a matter of slowing it down and not making the process faster that should be focused
Since the onset of the industrial revolution during the 19th century, humanity has rapidly stripped the earth of its natural resources and dumped countless byproducts into our environment. While 97% of climate scientists agree that climate change is real as well as man made (Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences) there is still debate as to the validity of this in the public debate. Philanthropic individuals and organizations play an important role in influencing public opinion as well as directly conserving at risk land and species in addition to fighting projects that could have disastrous environmental impact. These individuals play a major role in providing funding for environmental groups due a general lack of available government subsidies for the issue relative to subsidies provided for many other issues. (Kimble Pg. 2) These philanthropists come from varying sectors including finance, alternative energy, high technology, broadcasting, development and real estate.
...ronmentally sound technology to foreign countries. The United States needs to educate people, domestically and internationally, about the dangers the environment is currently facing. We need to act multilaterally with regional powers. There are treaties we have signed but not ratified or put into force. The United States needs to follow through with the treaties that have been signed but not ratified. Currently, some treaties that are still "on the table", and should be signed and put into force are; the Basal Convention on Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes, the Kyoto Protocol, Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Convention to Combat Desertification. These are some of the treaties that the United States needs to sign so that we can then say that we are definitely working towards improving the global environment through international treaties.
Suraje, Dessai, and Nuno S. Lacasta, Katharine Vincent. International Political History of the Kyoto Protocol: from The Hague to Marrakech and Beyond, International Review for Environmental Strategies Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 183 ? 205, 2003
Every one of us can make his own contribution to make a difference. Steps could be taken at home, at the office, on the road and anywhere else to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gas and any risks made to the climate as much as possible. By taking these steps, you would not only be helping the climate but they can also save you money and improve your health, for example decreasing the use of your car for short distances and instead going by foot. One can also take part in any programmes that are offered on a local or state level to support energy efficiency, or take part in clean energy programs or other climate programmes.
Despite Trump’s decision, individual states are still combatting climate change. Several northeastern and mid-Atlantic states will lower their cap on carbon emissions by $3 every year (“USA – Climate Action Tracker”, 2017). In some regards, this American dilemma mirrors the Canadian withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol. In both scenarios, the federal governments withdrew from environmental agreements due to their economic consequences, and instead provincial and state governments took charge in regard to climate
Therefore, I feel it absolutely necessary to develop a global policy that begins to limit emissions as we strive to reach
Only a handful of nations did not sign the Kyoto Protocol. One of them, and perhaps the most remarking one, was the United States. With so many highly polluting industries, it was a strategy call to disagree and to argument that the climate wasn’t changing at all.
Malakoff, David, and Erin Marie Williams. "Q & A: An Examination of the Kyoto Protocol." NPR. NPR. Web. 17 May 2014. .
In this paper, I begin by defining international governance and the problems surrounding the definition which provide background information. I go on to examine how the rules of the WTO have affected international environmental governance through ignoring environmental protection and labour rights. I compare from one angle the effects of GATT to trade liberalization. I use the example of the endangered sea turtle to show how the United States intended to protect the environment but was stopped by WTO rules. In conclusion, the WTO rules should change and be more democratic and appeal to environmental protection.
If you could change one thing to make the world a better place, what would it be? Would you trade in your SUV for a hybrid? Or something simpler, like changing all of the lights in your house to energy efficient ones? Or would you start to recycle everything you possibly could? Well, all of these things are great ways to become an eco-friendly person. In my opinion, it is most important to stop damaging the ozone layer. Right now there are still hundreds of thousands of cars on the road that don’t exactly help the earth’s condition, many other things that emit toxins into the air, and that needs to change. We can do this if we lessen the amount of harmful gases we let off when we use everyday appliances.
... emissions and protect our natural resources, before we look to make a profit. Because once the natural resources and ozone are destroyed and gone, they are gone forever.