(92%) The United Kingdom and Ireland, a set of European countries connected by a common border, share at least one other trait, and that is, they both have universal healthcare systems. The majority would expect the two countries’ health system to operate in a similar manner, due to their close proximity and the fact that they are both universal, but in fact the opposite is true. The Irish healthcare system and structure is very different from the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (Gold, 2011). A composition of four constituent countries, England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, the United Kingdom (UK) is a sovereign country that is commonly referred to as Great Britain (or Britain) (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010, p. 85). Located at the northwest corner of Europe, the United Kingdom has experienced one of the most prosperous periods of sustained growth in all of Europe, exhibiting a relatively steady rise in maturity and enterprise development for over 150 years (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010, p. 87). This is a reversal of a trend seen in the first half of the 20th century where according to the CIA World Fact Book, the United Kingdom’s role as a world power was seriously depleted between two world wars, followed by the Irish withdrawal from the union. The second half of the century watched the slow dismantling of the British Empire and the United Kingdom rebuilding itself into a modern and prosperous European nation (Johnson & Stoskopf, 2010, p. 85). A country stepped in tradition and institutionalism, Britain is one of the only countries that has no common set of governing documents, i.e. Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Constitution. Instead governmental roots can be traced back to the Magna Carta of 1215 whic... ... middle of paper ... ...he clinical effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and the process for calculating cost effectiveness should not prove to be too difficult. The problem lies in the fact that the Food and Drug Administration does not have the power to prevent a drug from making it to market if it is found to be ineffective in relation to cost. Additional barriers stem from opposition from consumers who say the purchase decision should be the consumers’ choice. In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) uses a $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) threshold for access under its National Health System (NHS). If a drug does not meet this threshold then it is denied. The value of $50,000 is substantially lower than recent estimates in the United States that put the value of a life year at close to $175,000 (Vernon, Goldberg, Dash, Muralimohan, 2007).
...rofiles of Health Care Systems, The Commonwealth Fund, June 2010. Retrieved April 20th, 2011 from website: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Fund%20Report/2010/Jun/1417_Squires_Intl_Profiles_622.pdf
During our history there have been many important governments in the world. Out of these governments, the Hammurabi’s and Thucydides are very strong governments. These governments are well known for their strong leadership and firm relationship between the people. On the other hand, the Magna Carta is the evidence of unsuccessful events of king john.
Not a unified and separate country until 1921, Northern Ireland has had cultural, financial, and economic that makes it stand affront from the rest of the Emerald Isles. With its close proximity to England and the immigration all through the 1600s of English and Scottish, Northern Ireland has become more anglicized th...
The history of the NHS from being chaotic to having an organised st ructure. The structure of the NHS is divided into local authority and social service, hospital services and general practitioners including specialist care. When the NHS was developed, there was no prediction of how much all the services would cost to run. The government introduced the first service charges for dentures in 1951and prescription and spectacle’s in 1952 this could have been due to everyone needing medical care at the same time. This also suggests that individuals health improved, likely to live longer and would need more services in the future which the government realised would be unrealistic to achieve. Even then, as it is currently, it remains difficult
The boasted Magna Charta of England, by its very nature, was too complex. Paine lectured that a structure so intricate would only allocate an entire nation to suffer without the country being able to find error in itself. The British hailed their parliamentary system as being the most wonderful, but Paine declared that it was nothing more than the remains of a tyranny. In Paine’s scrutiny Great Britain’s government was made worse by the monarchical king and aristocratical peers whom are designated by heredity. Bequeathed succession only opened the door to foolish, wicked, and improper headship. The British enunciated the House of Commons, in the English Constitution, created a unity to the ordained ruling society and the general population. Conversely, Thomas Paine contended that habitual validation of each component of British foundat...
Harrell, Eben. “Is Britain’s Health-Care System Really That Bad?” Time. August 18 2009. 13 October 2009. < http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1916570,00.html>.
Ventres W. “Answers to US health care issues from other countries” Fam Med. Sep 2011 43(8):592-3. PubMed PMID: 21918943
On one hand, political constitutionalists argue that parliamentary sovereignty is the underlying principle in the British constitution as power and law making are bo...
One of the most influential and celebrated scholars of British consistutional law , Professor A.V Dicey, once declared parliamentary soverignity as “the dominant feature of our political insitutions” . This inital account of parliamentray soverginity involved two fundamental components, fistly :that the Queen-in-Parliament the “right to make or unmake any law whatever” and that secondly “no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.” . However this Diceyian notion though an established principle of our constitution now lies uneasy amongst a myriad of contemporary challenges such as our membership of the European Union, the Human Rights Act and a spread of law making authority known as ‘Devolution’. In this essay I shall set out to assess the impact of each of these challenges upon the immutability of the traditional concept of parliamentary sovereignty in the British constitution.
It is our duty as humans to ensure that humanity is protected from cruel and vindictive oppression. The original Magna Carta essentially limited the power of King John, albeit on a temporary and limited basis, which has renewed and broadened inspiration in today’s world for the prevention of abuse of power. Despite the Magna Carta being an antiquated relic, the Magna Carta’s perceived spirit resonates in human
The concept of parliamentary political system was rooted in 1707 of Great Britain; the word derives from ‘parley’, a discussion. It was used to describe meetings between Henry III and noblemen in the Great Council (Szilagyi, 2009). It was originated in British political system and is often known as the Westminster model as it was used in the Palace of Westminster. It became influential throughout many European nations later in the 18th century (Smith, 2010). Countries with parliamentary systems are either constitutional monarchies such as the United Kingdom, Denmark, Australia, and Canada or parliamentary republics such as Greece, India, Ireland and Italy (McTeer, 1995). The parliamentary type of government is known for its three distinctive features; first, executive is divided into the head of state and the head of government, they are independently elected forming a dual executive; second, the fusion of ...
On the one hand, without international relations from the EU, Britain is economically and socially vulnerable. While Britain’s exit from the EU may define Britain’s power according to British citizens, the type of power that matters is relative power, which is the power when it is being compared to other states. If the other states do not recognize Britain as a force of power, then its exit from the EU is pointless. On the other hand, by discontinuing the benefits granted by the EU, Britain declines the assistance that could have helped the country to become more powerful. In other words, Brexit decreases a source of gathering power for Britain, since the EU not only offers economic opportunities, but it also provides useful information so that the member states can behave accordingly. Overall, realism suggests that while Brexit increases Britain’s confidence in being powerful, it also decreases the country’s power in a way.
During the twentieth century, Ireland was suffering through a time of economic hardship. “Economic growth was stagnant, unemployment was at a historic high and exceeded anywhere in the EU, except possibly Spain, and the state was one of the most indebted in the world” . Irish men and women who had received a formal education had immigrated to other nations due to the unavailability of jobs at home. This left Ireland in a state of further economic downfall, and the lack of skilled workers left Ireland stuck. The 1990’s were a turning point for Ireland. A rise in industry within the nation, as well as an increase in exports, led Ireland to become the “shining nation” in Europe. It became internationally linked with one of the biggest power nations, the United States, and international trade became Ireland’s new source for a booming economy. This brought the rise of what was known as the Celtic Tiger in Ireland.
In 1603 the Scottish and English monarchies were united and at the beginning of the eighteenth century, the monarchy of the United Kingdom was deprived of the decision-making privilege they once had. For the purpose of this essay, I intend to examine the many different arguments both for and against the British monarchy being abolished. Proponents argue strongly that the monarchy symbolises all that is British throughout Britain and the Commonwealth Realms. However, contrary to this, the monarchy receives exorbitant financial aid from the British taxpayers to maintain the monarchy. Does the monarchy have a place in the twenty first century?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (London: 2005). pp. 51, 71-72. Accessed May 3, 2014. http://www.jhud.co.uk/huddleston/uk2005_tcm77-248610.pdf.