Analysis Of James Martin's The Six Paths

1624 Words4 Pages

In James Martin’s book, The Jesuit Guide to (Almost) Everything: A Spirituality for Real Life, he outlines the different paths through religion that people can take. In the chapter, “The Six Paths”, he outlines each path, describing how they work, and what the benefits and pitfalls to each are. The six paths are: belief, independence, disbelief, return, exploration, and confusion. I tend to view myself more closely aligned with disbelief, with a dash of confusion and exploration thrown in. Through my experiences in life, I end up finding the most disagreement, personally, with the Path of Belief, and Disbelief. I find the pitfalls heavily outweigh the benefits of those paths, and in such I have commonly found a non-welcoming, elitist environment among people on those paths of religion. Before explaining my positions on …show more content…

It has, usually, the most devout believers, who find “meaning to both the joys and struggles in life” (Martin, page 30), who never feel alone in the world, and who find a community of compassionate worshipers to be with. From this point of view, it seems to be a wonderful option, and I’ve seen it this way: people who have always been in a certain religion are always welcomed in to the community of that religion. But it is not always so wonderful. The Path of Belief can also cause people to be intolerant to those who have differing views, they have a “temptation to judge” others (Martin, page 31), and they do not allow their beliefs to adapt as their lives change. You see this most in fundamentalist groups who see everyone who is not like them as an enemy to their system. But, I believe that this path has a good deal of balance, while there is narrow-mindedness and intolerance in some places, there is also love and hope and support in others. This path has extremes, but most of the members fall on the more positive end of the

Open Document