The Scientific Method is the standardized procedure that scientists are supposed to follow when conducting experiments, in order to try to construct a reliable, consistent, and non-arbitrary representation of our surroundings. To follow the Scientific Method is to stick very tightly to a order of experimentation. First, the scientist must observe the phenomenon of interest. Next, the scientist must propose a hypothesis, or idea in which the experiments will be based around. Then, through repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can either be proven false or become a theory. If the hypothesis is proven to be false, the scientist must reformulate his or her ideas and come up with another hypothesis, and the experimentation begins again. This process is to be repeated until a theory is produced. The production of a theory is usually called the conclusion. After considerable testing of the theory, it may become what is known as a law, but laws are only formed in very rare occasions where the theory can be proven without a doubt, which is usually done through induction.
The Scientific Method, as it is called, has existed for quite some time. Throughout human history scientists and mathematicians have followed the basic rudiments of the Method, although they were seldom documented and rarely followed the Method exactly. The term 'Scientific Method' was first coined by Italian doctor Francesco Redi in the late 17th century, following his experiment which disproved the spontaneous generation of maggots on decomposing trash. He first observed that maggots seemed to 'magically' form on decomposing meat, and hypothesized that this was not true. In his experiments, he had three pieces of meat, one in an open container, one in a container w...
... middle of paper ...
...ter Method' precisely one is not properly conducting science. According to Edmund, "If you do not teach any formula (set out method) when using problem-based learning programs (as opposed to using the Scientific Method), you fail to a great extent getting transfer of learning." Essentially what this means is that theres is no way to teach science properly except under the guidelines of the Scientific Method.
In reproducing many of the older and more basic experiments, the Scientific Method does still need to be used, though. Thus, the Scientific Method does not simply need to be abolished. However, there needs to be an acknowledgment that its principles do not and will not always apply to every aspect of science as is often the implication. Also, there needs to be more leeway in the ways we approach the methods behind science, both in and out of the classroom.
This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of using a method primarily for gathering research on human subjects that can be examined for later use. It will give a basic outline of the methods of investigation, their uses and their suitability. I will also look at the scientific method as a whole and examine the criticisms of this method using the writings of Hume and Popper.
Rebecca Skloot’s novel, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks told the story of the injustice done a a young African American woman, and her family. Henrietta’s cancerous cells were taken from her without her consent, and turned out to be immortal. They were sold all over the world for billions of dollars, while her family, struggling to put food on the table, did not receive a penny of it. Rebecca Skloot uncovers the hidden story of the HeLa cells, and provides a novel not only highly informational, but also with insight to the workings of science. This book outlines the process of scientific inquiry, reveals the contrary forces of altruism and profit that influenced HeLa, and the risks and benefits of profit guiding research as well as the obstacles faced when conducting research for purely altruistic reasons.
Historically, the scientific method has not been used too often and this is also the case of the Victorian era, that is, until John Snow found the way in which to eliminate the cholera problem through the use of the scientific method. The usefulness of the scientific method in both historical contexts, in the past and contemporary world, comes from the fact that it is essentially a template that guides a researcher through a transparent process that is chronologically correct which means that the process of proving or disproving an idea becomes logical. We see the scientific method being used in psychology in the form of research methods which including things like researchers paying a lot of attention to sample sizes, validity, reflexivity and the use of statistics in determining the accuracy and reliability of a hypothesis. Interestingly enough, even though psychology is a relatively new field, the scientific method has been adopted quickly and effortlessly as it is extremely efficient in proving the usefulness and accuracy of a researchers
The article Best Idea: Eyes Wide Open by Richard Powers discusses different aspects of the scientific method. It begins by talking about a man named Abu Ali al-Hasan Ibn al-Haytham who made discoveries regarding vision. He did this by simply performing observations and having people stare directly at the sun. Ibn al-Haytham changed the way science was viewed by telling people to simply look in order to gain information. Later, William of Ockham came up with the idea that “when you have multiple ways to explain something, go with the one that has the least amount of assumptions” (Powers, 1999, p. 4). My interpretation of this is that you shouldn’t make something harder than it needs to be. Do not assume, but rather work with the observations and experiments that you have performed. This idea eventually became known as Ockham’s Razor. Rene Descartes went in a different direction and believed that all science can be demonstrated by a series of deductions and self-evident facts, instead of something that is run through observation and experimentation.
Science is the knowledge gained by a systematic study, knowledge which then becomes facts or principles. In the systematic study; the first step is observation, the second step hypothesis, the third step experimentation to test the hypothesis, and lastly the conclusion whether or not the hypothesis holds true. These steps have been ingrained into every student of science, as the basic pathway to scientific discovery. This pathway holds not decision as to good or evil intention of the experiment. Though, there are always repercussions of scientific experiments. They range from the most simplistic realizations of the difference between acid and water to the principle that Earth is not the center of the Universe. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein depicts this very difference in the story of Victor Frankenstein. A scientist who through performing his experiments creates a monster which wreaks havoc upon humanity. Frankenstein concentrating wholly upon discovery ignores the consequences of his actions.
Francis Bacon ~ used the scientific method to conduct experiments, he is known as a father of modern science for this.
by saying that it is science is a disgrace to the scientific method. This statement was
Jakob Bronowski’s book, “Science and Human Values” argues that the scientific method of inquiry into reality provides a generally applicable foundation for moral judgement. Bronowski says, “in order to keep the study in a manageable field. I will continue to choose a society in which the principle of truth rules. Therefore the society which I will examine is that formed by scientists themselves: it is the body of scientists” (Bronowski 58). Bronowski makes it clear in his book that he is going to base his study on scientists. There are five steps in the scientific method of inquiry into reality. The first one being Observation, the second is Hypothesis, the third is Experiments, the fourth is Theory, and the fifth being Publishing.
Sir Popper's piece, "Science: Conjectures and Refutations," reaffirms the scientific methods currently in use. No scientific theory is ratified without serious consideration and careful observation. Science is the pursuit of what can be proven false and the resulting assumptions of what must be true.
The scientific method is the analyzation of evidence, to examine a case from every angle possible, to not give up on an investigation until all of the angles are covered and to not allow personal emotions create a bias in their mind (Osterburg 2010). A scientific method example would be when an investigator arrives to a crime scene, they would first search the area for clues and see if something doesn’t seem right. Next they would have to search for different forms of evidence, most important would be trace evidence because it can provide DNA evidence which can also link a suspect to the crime. There are many more ways evidence and other clues can be harvested from a crime scene but it is up to the investigator to use their knowledge and help find the person responsible for the crime
Anything that can be studied is absolutely considered a science. When people think of science and the scientific method they most often think of chemicals. Human experiment’s can also be conducted and considered scientific. The scientific method can be used to study people. Simply start by asking a question, doing background research, and then constructing a hypothesis. When studying people or their culture you can absolutely start with these simple steps, therefore using science to study these people. After determining your hypothesis, you can test it with an experiment, record your results and form a conclusion. “Science is the best system yet devised for reducing subjective bias, error, untruths, lies, and frauds.” (Harris, 1994, Pg. 6) Harris states that using science is they best way to prevent errors or miscalculations. We use science everyday; to assess every situation, and every problem that we have, even when we don’t think we a...
resolve problems. With the scientific method you have four steps to follow which include defining the
Everyday psychologists, chemist, biologists, and other professionals use the scientific method to guide us through the research being conducted. In this case, I would use the scientific method to help guide me in running a successful research study to help determine the accuracy of a polygraph exam when knowing the exam can exhibit false results. Professionals would make observations, gather information, form theories, test predictions and interpret results all which is the standardized way of the scientific
The steps that are included in most pre-college textbooks are defining the problem, gathering background information, forming a hypothesis, making observations, testing the hypothesis, drawing conclusions, and communicating the results, but this method is not used. One reason for this myth is the way results are published in research journals because it makes people believe that scientists follow a certain research plan. Philosophers have shown that no research procedure is applied by all scientists. Usually scientists use imagination, knowledge, perseverance, and other methods used by problem solvers. This myth teaches that science is not different from other challenges that humans face. This myth has a chance to be corrected because many newer textbooks are taking the method out of the discussions of
Science is highly based on rationality and logical explanation. Science involves empiricism and experimentation, which are more generally referred to as the scientific method (Hagan, 2010). The scientific method is used to determine relationships between different variables and to discover certain causes. Theories are tested using this method by using evidence that is measurable and discoverable. The scientific method can be applied in social science research but its use is limited. The steps involved in the scientific method revolve around the “gathering of data, by observation and research, formulation of hypotheses, testing by experiment, replication of tests to ensure consistent results, and avoidance of personal bias and ...