The principle of utility is based on the greatest amount of happiness an action results in to the largest quantity of people who are affected by the consequences (Mill 89). Mill believes people should sacrifice as much as they can from their own possible happiness so that more people may obtain equal happiness that is sufficient. In doing so, those who are aiding others are creating a society of ultimate happiness where everyone is content. Thus, Mill argues for quantity over quality to the extent where everyone has just enough contentment that they do not feel pain or deprivation. For example, according to the principle, if in the future there is an unbiased computerized system for selecting organ donors, those who are selected to donate their organs to two or more people are obligated to do so. In doing so, the single individual is saving the lives of a greater number of people, and thus creates more happiness than if he alone lived and the two or more people died.
In discussing if people would be motivated to relinquish their own prosperity to aid o...
... middle of paper ...
...ins more faults than he mentioned. I do agree to the principle of utility relative to maximizing happiness for the most amount of people possible. However, in regards to my example about the computerized system that sacrifices a healthy person to save the lives of other’s, the use of the principle would be morally and ethically wrong. Although people have the choice to become organ donors, in the example, the computer would be killing someone instead of using an already deceased person’s organs to save another’s life. This issue is an example of the differences between Kant and Mill, which I believe if combined can make Mill‘s theory better suited for real-life situations. Intentions are not always the most significant factors similarly to how results are not. Therefore, combining certain aspects of Kant’s theory with Mill’s would make Mill’s work more appropriate.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Utilitarianism, originally introduced by Jeremy Bentham and extended by John Stuart Mill, (Mark Timmons, 2006) is an ethical theory which states that to be good is to deliver the greatest amount of happiness to most of the people based on the consequences of the action. Utilitarianism considers the good for the majority is the final solution rather than everyone severing only their own interests. Utilitarianism mainly focuses on the possible consequences of a decision.... [tags: utilitarianism, ethical theory, happiness]
1627 words (4.6 pages)
- In this paper I will present and critically assess the concept of the principle of utility as given by John Stuart Mill. In the essay “What Utilitarianism Is” #, Mill presents the theory of Utilitarianism, which he summarizes in his “utility” or “greatest happiness principle” # (Mill 89). Mill’s focus is based on an action’s resulting “happiness,” # pleasure and absences of pain, or “unhappiness,” # discomfort and the nonexistence of contentment, rather than the intentions involved (Mill 89). After evaluating Mill’s principle, I will then end this essay by discussing my personal opinion about the doctrine and how I believe it can be altered to better suit real-life situations.... [tags: John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism]
1362 words (3.9 pages)
- ... For someone to be a competent judge between the amount of pleasure between two different acts, they must have experience with both. (514) Such a judge is then able to gauge which of the two provides the greater amount of pleasure, and whatever a group of all or most competent judges decide, must also produce the greatest amount of happiness.(514) In regards to the common question of lying, Mill approaches the issue from both sides. First, he states that it is okay to lie so you can save yourself from embarrassment.(516) Secondly he claims that consistently telling the truth has it’s advantage in trust.(516) To this he says there are exceptions to this rule.... [tags: unhappiness, pleasure, lying, time]
904 words (2.6 pages)
- Is utilitarianism able to account for the importance of justice and honesty. Be sure to discuss both rule and act utilitarianism. Do either of these accounts work. Explain your answer. Justice and Honesty: Rules in Utilitarianism Reconsidered Utilitarianism, with the Principle of Utility or Greatest Happiness Principle being its core, is a consequentialist theory which attaches the greatest importance to the consequences of each action. While acting justly and honestly may not always bring the best consequences, some criticize its conflicts between traditional moral rules or virtues, such as justice and honesty.... [tags: greatest happiness principle]
1472 words (4.2 pages)
- In John Stuart Mill’s work Utilitarianism, Mill is trying to provide proof for his moral theory utilitarianism and disprove all the objections against it. Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness" (Ch. II, page 7). He calls this the “greatest happiness principle. Mill says, “No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except the fact that each person desires his own happiness, so far as he thinks it is attainable.... [tags: Morality Principle, General Happiness]
2028 words (5.8 pages)
- In determining what is the foundation of happiness, hedonism claims that it is pleasure with the absence of pain that is the only intrinsic good. An intrinsic good can be described as something that is good in and of itself. It is good not because it leads to something else, it is good for its own sake; as compared to an instrumental good, which is a means to an end. Pleasure describes the broad class of mental states that humans experience as positive, enjoyable, or worth seeking. Qualitative hedonists believe that there can be different levels of pleasure, meaning that some will be better than others.... [tags: Absense of Pain, Intrinsic Good, Pleasure]
1199 words (3.4 pages)
- Proving A Moral Principle Once one has examined an ethical theory and knows what its fundamental concepts are — what kinds of factors are to be used in making moral judgments, whether its principles apply directly to acts or rules, and what concepts of the good life is proposed — one is certainly in a better position to judge which of all the competitive principles comes closest to fulfilling the task of giving a complete account of moral phenomena. Unfortunately this may not be enough to enable us to choose among them.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Morals Essays]
2521 words (7.2 pages)
- What is happiness. People have agonized over this question for centuries. Let me start this essay by answering a somewhat easier question: what isn’t happiness. Happiness is NOT feeling good all the time. Happiness is a combination of human emotions and states of mind. Exploring this state of being has consumed the philosophical minds of the ages and will continue to do so for ages to come. In an unofficial poll of students at State University, I found that of the fifty-eight students and one professor, males and females of several ethnic backgrounds and age groups, that I asked the question "What is happiness to you?", all of them had very different physical, intellectual, or emotional moti... [tags: John Stuart Mill Essays]
767 words (2.2 pages)
- Evaluation of the Principle of Ahimsa is Hinduism’s Greatest Gift to the World Many people, especially Hindus agree with the statement that the key principle of ahimsa in Hinduism is the greatest gift that the religion has to offer to the rest of the world. Ahimsa translates as ‘non-violence’ or ‘non-injury’ and is quite an ancient theory as it is described in the Vedas. These four holy books contain a teaching reading “Do not kill any living being”. Hindu teaching illustrates that all living things contain Brahman and they all also have an atman.... [tags: Papers]
1074 words (3.1 pages)
- John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Happiness Along with other noted philosophers, John Stuart Mill developed the nineteenth century philosophy known as Utilitarianism - the contention that man should judge everything in life based upon its ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. While Bentham, in particular, is acknowledged as the philosophy’s founder, it was Mill who justified the axiom through reason. He maintained that because human beings are endowed with the ability for conscious thought, they are not merely satisfied with physical pleasures; humans strive to achieve pleasures of the mind as well.... [tags: John Stuart Mill Philosophical Essays]
1114 words (3.2 pages)