The Garden

1602 Words4 Pages

Andrew Marvell’s “The Garden” is a poem that through logical progression argues its already established point of view. It is a poem of meditation in a particular place, where the place presented influences the course of this meditative state. Even though filled with the imagery of nature the poem takes a rather pessimistic point of view, where it argues that total isolation from society and harmony with nature as the singular best way of living. Thus, the whole of the poem centers on the idea of wholesome nature in a world without the instruction of mankind. In the first three stanzas, the virtues of the garden are provided through comparison with the trial (and supposed pleasures) of the world of men, stanzas five through seven address the pleasures of the body, the mind, and the soul as they are gratified in the garden, stanza eight through nine returns to the gesture to Paradise. As this logical progression of argument moves in the poem, each part returns to the idea of isolation, or rather a solitary state of being of the speaker.

The poem opens up with the argument of the destructive function of civilization on nature, concentrating here specifically on the purpose of human efforts to seek recognition through destruction of nature. The opening lines take the argument of nature against men seamlessly: “How vainly men themselves amaze / To win the palm, the oak, or bays” (1-2). From he very first lines the reader can sense that inutility of labor is denigrated in favor of the leisured enjoyment of nature. In line 4, the speaker establishes the argument of the crown—which symbolizes the human longing for recognition. However, this crown is made out of a cut down branch or shrub and therefore shortening their life as they fad...

... middle of paper ...

...allowed full autonomy, free from the necessities of sec and procreation. Therefore, the retreat to this state of the garden is a rejection of the entire world and satiety, and what is presented as a validating state of satisfaction of the speaker is doomed to last a short time, as it presumes that in a greater privilege is gained than from “a mortal’s share” (61). In the poem’s closing stanza, with its image of the flower dial, the speaker returns to the earthly reality. “How could such sweet and wholesome hours / Be reckoned but with herbs and flowers!” (71-72), herb and flowers are transient, quickly dying things, unsustainable through seasons. Thus, the image of the floral clock signifies that time is not still, seasons change and the speaker is not in a timelessness of eternity (heaven) yet and therefore his stay in the garden must be similarly short-lived.

Open Document