First, let’s consider the reasoning behind the patients choosing to forego extraordinary treatment for their cancer. They have decided, as Beauchamp would put it, that refusing to prolong their lives in the face of pain and suffering “neither harms nor wrongs [them] and may provide a benefit” (Beauchamp, 76). They “intend to quit life because of its bleak possibilities” (Beauchamp, 77). The doctor readily complies with their wishes out of moral, legal, and professional obligation. A choice has been made to let both patients die, as a response to their “competent and authoritative refusal of treatment” (Beauchamp 74).
In Patient A’s case, he was lucky enough (in the most morbid way possible) to...
... middle of paper ...
...es out of mercy. Beauchamp puts it eloquently when he says “From a moral point of view, causing a person’s death is wrong when it is wrong not because the death is intended or because it is caused, but because an unjustified harm or loss to the person occurs” (Beauchamp, 76).
The objection that killing Patient B is worse than allowing Patient A to die does not survive, because such a claim is based on the assumption that a killing would be unjust. The doctor and the patients have decided that death is preferable to life, and there is no injustice involved in any possible outcome from there on out. Squeamishness about the doctor being responsible for killing Patient B, directly, has no place in the discussion, because by the time the discussion is taking place, that would be like being squeamish over the doctor prescribing morphine to reduce a patient’s suffering.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The right to life that has been stated in the Declaration of Independence brings up controversial debates about the morality of war, self-defense, capital punishment, abortion and euthanasia. Euthanasia is the ending of a life to escape suffering and pain. Although many believe that assisted suicide, also known as physician-assisted death is morally wrong, I think that under certain, strict circumstances, people should have the choice whether or not they want to suffer towards the end of their lives.... [tags: euthanasia, mercy killing]
1693 words (4.8 pages)
- It is a big question that most people often struggle with to decide when it is consider appropriate to assist an individual with mercy killing. In 1993, Robert Latimer a Saskatchewan farmer took the life of his twelve-year old daughter Tracy in an act of mercy killing. Latimer’s daughter suffered from the most dreadful form of cerebral palsy. She was severely disabled and had a mind of a four month old baby. Tracy was confined to a wheelchair and had endured multiple operations. She couldn’t walk, talk, or feed herself and she was in constant pain.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Murder, Suffering]
1066 words (3 pages)
- Mercy killing, also known as controlled suicide or euthanasia occurs when a person ends another person’s life intentionally. Among the reasons is that they believe that it is in their best interest to alleviate pain and suffering from a patient suffering from an incurable disease. The term is used to describe both situations when a person asked their life to be ended and when they never asked. Under the current law, any person who ends another person’s life can be charged with murder and also face mandatory life imprisonment if found guilty.... [tags: Death, Suicide, Euthanasia, Homicide]
1920 words (5.5 pages)
- Mercy Killing There is an immense debate about whether terminally ill people should be able to control their own death. Most people probably wish for an eternal painless life unfortunately that is not the case. Lives seem to end just about every day around the world. Some are accidents, some are suicides, and others are murders. In just about all states in the United States of America, euthanasia is illegal, and it is considered a criminal act. Many believe that because patients are suffering too much as it is with their illness that they should be able to control their life.... [tags: Euthanasia Essays]
1461 words (4.2 pages)
- Euthanasia is the process in which one’s life is taken with the assistance of a physician. This process is also known as assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, and mercy killing. Euthanasia stems from the Greek word eu- which means good and -thanatos which means death. Therefore, a direct translation of the world Euthanasia means a good death, which is exactly what the goal of euthanasia is. Euthanasia only becomes an option for patients when they have terminal illness and diseases. Euthanasia has become a controversial topic as there are many pros and cons to the idea of helping someone’s suffering end.... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Medical ethics, U.S. state]
709 words (2 pages)
- The applied moral issue of euthanasia, or mercy killing, concerns whether it is morally acceptable for a third party, such as a physician, to end the life of a terminally ill patient who is in intense pain. I will go further into the facts of this in my paper. The euthanasia controversy is part of a larger issue concerning the right to die. Staunch defenders of personal liberty argue that all of us are morally entitled to end our lives when we see fit. Thus, according to these people, suicide is in principle morally permissible.... [tags: essays research papers]
1553 words (4.4 pages)
- Investigating Mercy Killing By euthanasia is understood an action or an omission which itself or by intention causes death, in order that all suffering may be eliminated. Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics in the public's opinion. The question of euthanasia must be answered from an ethical standpoint. Our Creator God has concluded the number of days we are to live on this earth, He created us in his image and declared all human life precious. Therefore we are at no liberty whatsoever to take the life of any innocent human being no matter what conditions they may fall under.... [tags: Papers]
524 words (1.5 pages)
- Euthanasia Essay - Mercy Killing Not Necessary "Mercy Killing" as Euthanasia is also known, has been outlawed within the United States. The definition of mercy killing is where someone is terminally ill with a disease, and an accomplice helps to end the misery of that victim's life. In my opinion, this decision should be a live and let live decision. If and only if the victim agrees ahead of time before the pain starts to end it, then they should live their life the way they want to; if that includes ending it the way they want to, so be it.... [tags: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide]
605 words (1.7 pages)
- If we are still to attach a degree of culpability to those guilty of a ‘mercy killing’ then perhaps the best approach to follow is that currently undertaken in New Zealand. Here, there is a relaxation of the mandatory life sentence for those guilty of a ‘mercy killing’. As established in the Sentencing Act 2002 ‘An offender who is convicted of murder must be sentenced to imprisonment for life unless, given the circumstances of the offence and the offender, a sentence of imprisonment for life would be manifestly unjust’ .... [tags: Murder, Life imprisonment, Criminal law]
946 words (2.7 pages)
- In 2010, 38,364 suicides were reported in the United States alone (Center for Disease Control). With a number that high, it is clear that suicide is becoming more prevalent in today’s society. Individuals should be working to decrease the number of suicides, not increase them. However, with the development of modern medicine, physicians are actually contributing the deaths of people. Since there are many cases of uncertainty, it is unethical for a physician to posses the power to take a life, for ultimately, God possesses that power.... [tags: euthanasia, mercy killing, god]
1617 words (4.6 pages)