Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social effects of technology
Effects of tech on society
Social effects of technology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social effects of technology
Over centuries, technology has been playing an important role in life and it is constantly changing, shaping new social forms. Social analysts have been denying the notion that technology is simply the product of rational technical imperatives and technology is actually a socio-technical product, according to the situations of its creation and use. (Wajcman 2002) In the early days, technology was known as the application of scientific knowledge to create the output, which can be either a product or service. Yet this is not absolutely true as human beings created inventions through trial and errors. Technology has a dynamic force in helping to accomplish tasks within an organization. It can be seen as beneficial, yet evil. Beneficial to businesses if it can improve work progress and generate profits, but evil, refers to the negative consequences that may occur, be it intentionally or unintentionally, like the creation of weapons. (Volti 2012)
Over the years, due to technology advancement, it has created impacts to organizations, changing the work patterns; the way people behave, creating knowledge and profits. Looking at how wired we are, reliant on the use of technology, has technology shaped who we are or the reverse? This essay will cover the relations between technology, organizations, management and employees, based on the two diverging groups’ perspectives – the Modernists and Postmodernists.
Modernists adopt objective ontology, they believe that things exist already for a reason and the task is then to discover and uncover the truth. With the centered ideology, they focus on reality of knowledge and are not influenced by personal feelings and interpretations but based on facts that can be tested and measured. They also f...
... middle of paper ...
...ith the modernists because they feel that we are instead, the servants of technology. Truth may exist independent of human consciousness but there is no objective means of nailing it down. Adding on, postmodernists do not accept the fact that there is any organization structure for there should be no boundary. Postmodernists are more concerned about how to solve the problems through studying implications rather than trying to figure out the reason behind them, like what the modernists do. In postmodernism, they stress that organization culture is not real; it serves as only an illusion. Postmodernists disagree with the modernist control methods will result in organizational effectiveness. They seek to deconstruct previous authority sources and power. When power is distrusted, they try to set up a less hierarchal approach in which authority sources are more diffuse.
Considering how to define Modernism and PostModernism required looking at how worldviews today play a large part of our perspectives towards society, culture and religion. Modernism is a sociological movement that began in the last decade of the 19th century and first decades of the 20th century that rejected the customary or traditional worldview to a new and improved way by asserting a shift in power and authority into the providence of leaders in politics and universities and away from the church.
To understand post-modernism we must first understand modernism. Modernism is the philosophy that began with the Enlightenment. The Enlightenment was an era when science and art flourished. European society used the Enlightenment to object to the oppression of the church. This era emphasized only those things that are observable or measurable (Smith, 1995). The scientific method developed at this time became the standard to which everything is measured. Modernism, although moving away from the confinements of religion, was limiting in its own way.
Postmodernism movement started in the 1960’s, carrying on until present. James Morley defined the postmodernism movement as “a rejection of the sovereign autonomous individual with an emphasis upon anarchic collective anonymous experience.” In other words, postmodernism rejects what has been established and makes emphasis on combined revolutionary experiences. Postmodernism can be said it is the "derivate" of modernism; it follows most of the same ideas than modernism but resist the very idea of boundaries. According to our lecture notes “Dominant culture uses perception against others to maintain authority.”
In today's world, technology is constantly changing from a new paperclip to an improvement in hospital machinery. Technology lets people improve the way they live so that they can preserve their own personal energy and focus on the really important factors in life. Some people focus their energy on making new innovations to improve transportation and the health of people that may save lives and some people focus on making new designs of packaging CDS. Technology is significant in everyone's life because it rapidly changes what is in the market. But, some new innovations of technology are ridiculous because they serve no purpose in helping mankind.
Modernism described as movement in arts would best be described as a movement that was used to unit America after a period of crisis, it did this by it being centered on explorations into the spiritual nature of men and the value of his society and institutions. In a way it was like realism they too focused on the changes on society. The modernistic writers always wrote in a very formal defined form.
Technology enables students and teachers to have a fast and easy way to acquire unlimited access to tons of information. With all of the useful technologies, the curriculum is bound to change in endless ways, creating more opportunity for learning.
The Modernist period was a time in history when there were many changes. These changes varied from the American Dream to the literary styles and techniques. The American Dream became less complex and was more flexible than ever. It varied from the changing lifestyles to the change in literature. Helping to shape the nation into what we see today. People were focusing more on themselves and wanting to be known, and they also wanted to have money. Living life with an optimistic viewpoint.
The Modernist movement period was change in the world that took place between the end of the nineteenth century and throughout the twentieth century. Modernism is something that has happened and no longer represents the now or the contemporary of the world. Modern design is developed of all that came before it and through experimentation, innovation, and individualism, which forward society. Great leaders in the modernist movement were intellectuals, artists, philosophers and scientists. Modernist such as Kafka, Woolf and Toomer influence literature constantly reform reshape society with a variety of theme of their of personal life and life during the 19th, 20th.
The notion of postmodernism has rapidly made its way to the front and center of our social discussion topics. The question that must be asked concerning this erroneous view from the premise is, ‘How does anyone think this logically and pragmatically could be an idea which they could hold firm to?’ The idea of postmodernism guarantees that there are no guarantees. In other terms, postmodernism boldly states that there is a solid truth that the earth is incapable of boldly producing statements of solidified truths. Straight from the premise of this fallacious idea we see a landslide of incoherence and an overwhelming sense of vacillation at the very foundation.
Modernism was a movement of the arts, faith, sciences and architecture at the began around the early 20th century that rejected the popular ideas of the 19th century. What brought about these change was development in new technology, manufacturing and engineering (Wikipedia, 2017). Architects started to incorporate more glass, steel and reinforced concrete into their work, contrasting the popular building construction of ornate wood structure. “The ideal of architecture (modern architecture, more exactly) came to full stop at some point in the 1970’s (McMorrough, 2008). The modernist movement lasted almost 60 years, and then it was followed by the post-modernist movement.
The whole idea behind Modernism is the breaking of the chains that bound artists and authors alike; surpassing the limits imposed on them by the conventions of their predecessors. A true Modernist was not afraid to risk their prestige or their career in hopes of setting new standards for what it means to be a true work of creative genius. The tenaciousness of the Modernist style is the same as that of history's greatest inventors and philosophers, changing the way we perceive the world, and leading us on the path towards becoming a more advanced civilization.
...d War 2 and the Cold War technologies, counter cultural techno-utopianism which saw the rise of Punk and Deconstructivism, and most importantly – Post Modernism. Even though the theory of Digital Culture is still in its early stage of development and there are still many different views and arguments on what it really encompasses of, it can be said that since its conception, digital technology has been analysed and examined through many schools of thoughts, theories and methodologies. Technology has been around through modernist and postmodernist times, and even though the “Digital Age” has not really been coined an era, the rise of digital culture even over just the past one to two decades have changed the way we conceive the future of digital technology and will definitely continue to be an even more integral part of our every day lives (Creeber and Martin, 2009).
Postmodernism, on the other hand, aspires to reflect the critical. Critical knowledge is a process, rather than product. Absolute knowledge is unattainable, conditional, and provisional at best. Any unequivocal sense of the real is rendered superfluous. Truth, therefore, remains elusive, relativistic, partial, and always incomplete; it cannot be learned in totality. "Truth itself is a contingent affair and assumes a different shape in the light of differing local urgencies and convictions associated with them" (Fish 207). Critical knowledge has no choice but to exercise complicity with the cultural historical context in which it is hopelessly mired. As Lee Patterson states, "Even scholars who are dealing with chronologically and geographically distant materials are in fact examining a cultural matrix within which they themselves stand, and the understandings at which they arrive are influenced not simply by contemporary interests but by the shaping past that they are engaged in recovering" (259).
Nevertheless, many fears to technological advancement have been expressed similarly to that of their predecessors by the ‘Neo-Luddites’ of today (Stewart 1996, p.13). A prime advocate, author of The End of Work and US economist, Jeremy Rifkin asserts that technology is a ‘revolution’ which has taken over the world, posing a significant restructuring of the workforce and quality of life (Wyndham 1997, p.
But in the use of the term “technology” today, there is far more associated meaning than automobiles or washing machines. It has ushered in an entirely new way of working, and in increasing numbers of organizations, increased options of just where work associated with a particular job will be done. More employees than ever have the option of working at home yet still being employed either full...