Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
fiscal policies during great recession
fiscal policies during great recession
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: fiscal policies during great recession
“Proposition 30”
Proposition 30 (prop 30 or SB11) is supported by the schools and local public safety protection Act of 2012. Prop 30 is a tax initiative led by California governor Jerry Brown. Prop 30 is aimed at reducing forecasted budget cuts to public schools also higher education, by increasing the California sales tax from 7.25% to 7.50%for the next four years. It also will create three new tax brackets for taxable incomes. Incomes exceeding $250,000, $300,000 and $500,000 will pay more in taxes for the next seven years. With the extra money being saved will go towards adding more classes for higher education students. Also to help reduce California’s state budget, prop 30 should raise $6 billion annually form raised taxes.
If Prop 30 was a around when I graduated from high school I would of went to college right away. Prop 30 would of provided more classes for students to attend instead I decided to go a different for a few years. Plus college was out of my budget at the time. So I decided to join the merchant marines, which allowed me to make good money and save for college. I was in the merchant marines for 5 ½ years. With more classes and lower tuition I believe you would see more people choose to further their higher education instead of working a dead end job.
Conservatives believe that prop 30 is unconstitutional. Californians will endure the biggest tax hike in years. Tax payers will cough up $6 billion annually to fund the education expense. Michelle Steele states “Prop 30 won’t fix our schools or stabilize the state budget; it will increase tax volatility and leave our children facing more of the same debt” (Steele). You can’t make a judgment like that till has been in effect for a few years Michelle Steele ...
... middle of paper ...
...e able lower tuition because of prop 30.
Before prop 30 was in affect students were going different directions. Students are taking up careers that don’t require a higher education degree. Its not just tuition that is holding people back from attending higher education, it’s the lack of classes which are one a first come basis. With prop 30 it puts more people in classes. Jessika Jones believes "Affordability of higher education was a problem even before the state’s current budget crisis. But with recent budget cuts, the situation is worsening. Students and their families are taking on higher debt, and costs may deter students from attending college"(Jones). Students are taking up an apprenticeship which leads to pretty decent careers. Because college tuition is so expensive and less classes this drops college reputation as well as their graduation rate.
to tear this law down I believe that California can not afford to do without
This continues to have an effect on the local government in California because every time the governments wants to impose a tax they have to put it to vote before the taxpayers if it has anything to do with local taxes. Schools are also still without some of the much needed programs that would benefit the children and help to keep them off the street. Teachers are also forced to have bigger classrooms due to the cuts. Although these propositions have helped a few people by lowering property taxes, I feel that in the long run the children are hurt due to the loss in programs such as art, music and some sports just because we want to pay a lower amount of property taxes. This is just something the people of California will have to live with.
A state income tax is a small price to pay considering all the benefits it provides many citizens with. As a college student, I am trying to receive as much state money to fund my college career, and not having a state income tax is leaving less money to fund my education. With a high sales tax my school supplies end up being more expensive and with property taxes being so high, rent increases.”The Senate’s first crack at the budget calls for hundreds of millions of dollars of cuts for universities”(Watkins, Daniel, 2017).
It is a real tragedy that the civil rights of a substantial group of people has been trampled upon by the passing of Proposition 8. When one looks at the reasons why people voted for it, pointless arguments taken out of context are seen. As was pointed out in many of the sources which I found on the debate about the revision, California wields a large amount of influence on how the rest of the United States, and by extension, the rest of the world views issues. It can only be hoped that that will not be the case in this instance.
This newspaper article discusses why schools have been raising their tuition rates and how this has been affecting their incoming students percentage. It does also touch on the fact that many “out-of-stater...
In 1965, the Secondary Education Act (ESEA) passed by President Lyndon B. Johnson even though there was concern prior to that date. It outlined and provided funds for educational programs that were considered essential for public education. The ESEA was followed in 1967 by Title VII providing federal funding for the Bilingual Education Act of 1968. Following this Act was the 1982 amendment to the Bilingual Education Act of 1968, making guidelines more flexible. Then in 1994, California, introduced and passed Proposition 187 denying illegal immigrants health care, social services, and public education. It was challenged and the U.S. District Court confirmed that the federal government has exclusive authority of immigration policies and thus, the law was unconstitutional. So in 1998, California responded by passing Proposition 227 stating that all California students must be taught in English placing all non-English speaking students in a short-term English immersion program. The government, noting that student scores were declining, passed the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001 mandating each state to measure every public school student's progress in reading and math from the third grade through the ei...
On November 5, 2002, voters approved the reduction of class sizes around the state, much to the dismay of the governor and well-informed citizens everywhere. Governor Bush previously had warned that the revision to the constitution would cost $27.5 billion over eight years and would force the state to raise taxes and cut services. Unfortunately, naïve supporters of class size reduction chose to go ahead with the modification of the constitution for emotional reasons, having no actual evidence demonstrating benefit from smaller classes. Much evidence exists, however, to demonstrate why this amendment should not have been passed.
...ter homes, they can add a tax levy to help support their education according to state and local guidelines.
...h; they have to think about the cause and effect of the situation. Most people are just very concerned that this tax is going to break them, which may be true because the dollar they pay everyday for a month could add up to 60 dollars; that 60 dollars can go towards groceries, or gas.
...ave changed and college is extremely expensive now. There are not enough jobs openings for college graduates which leaves them unemployed with heavy debt. The vast majority of jobs in America require only vocational training or a skill certificate. People who do not have the aptitude for college should not be forced into thinking college is the only way to be successful in life. Society should encourage students to explore all job options not just the college related ones, because with the way times are changing getting trained from a vocational school is the best option America’s citizens have.
America’s future lies in the youth and building an educated youth that is interested in their career would benefit society. Rising college tuition is hurting the higher education of America. As more financial pressure is placed on these kids, the more they aren’t able to focus on their goals and dreams. Although inflation is a problem, the students who are able to graduate will benefit society if they worry more about their job. They should be able to satisfy their duty in society and a rise in college tuition will hinder that vision substantially.
As stated earlier, the cost of college is too high and it needs to be reduced to a more reasonable amount. It is expected that young adults in this day in age would want to go to college or another post-secondary education school to receive higher learning and to somewhat better their lives. While this is true ...
There are so many students who would extremely grateful to attend any four year institution but can’t because of the lack of funds. College life can be very stressful, and the process can is very frustrating to most students the first two years. When the cost of college tuition is compared to the 21 century financial economy the cost does not make sense, because for a middle-class family it is impossible to afford sending their child to any four-year institution. It hard for students to graduate with the stress to pay-off hundreds and thousands of dollars in loans. Going to college is stressful enough without the need to worry about how we’re going to pay for it and what other costs will continue to rise with getting a degree afterwards. With the current increase of unemployment rate and the thought of going to college seems like a farfetched goal. Many people choice not to attend a four year institution, because they did receive a scholarship or enough government funding. Having a college background is very important for professional growth, it will eventually limit career opportunities. My stand point is, you may not leave college doing the same thing you began with but the life experience is endless. College experience not only gives knowledge that builds you into a better person by giving a broader erosion. With the cost of tuition increasing will hurt our generation, by causing physical and mental stress but in the end it will all pay off. Not all colleges are for the blame; some of the blame is our economy and other factors play a big roll. As students we need to be aware of all our resources offered, such as Pell Grants, and government scholarships. For example, the some states will pay for a student’s college if they graduate high school with a GPA of 3.5 or higher. There are many states that are willing to pay for all or some of college tuition only if students are willing to use
Higher education costs have been increasing at a rapid pace, faster than inflation for the economy as a whole, for the past fifty years. It started in the 1960’s when the federal government passed the Higher Education Act to increase the amount of people able to afford and attend college. Regardless of the Unites States Government efforts to increase the affordability of college, federal aid programs have not risen to expectations due to the ever-increasing college prices. To lower the price of college, the government needs to cut back on student financial spending to go only to the lowest income families and create tax incentives for families to start saving up on their own.
Weisman, Jonathan. (1998, April 24). School tax break voted: Senate also defeats national tests, back state block grants. The Sun. Baltimore, MD.