Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Limit internet freedom essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Limit internet freedom essay
Persuasive Essay Outline
1. Introduction
A. The Hook - When we hop online, we sometimes take for granted that we have virtually unlimited access. For the most part, we can look at any website we want, whenever we want. We can watch any video, listen to any song, stream any podcast, email any friend and find almost any piece of information we can imagine. Anything we could ever want access to is always there and waiting for us. What makes that possible is "Net Neutrality."
B. What Net Neutrality actually is - Users connect to the internet through cables and satellites owned by internet service providers. The providers are usually telephone and cable companies. These companies are not allowed to tamper with or alter the information that is passed through these channels. It doesn't matter whether it's Google or Yahoo, youtube or twitter, everyday citizens or business tycoons. Everybody's website gets the same speed and the same treatment. That is called net neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers should treat all data on the Internet equally, without discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication. This guarantees a level playing field for all Web sites and Internet technologies. But all that could change.
C. The Dilemma - The biggest cable and telephone feel as though an open internet is unconstitutional. These companies would like to charge more money for faster access to Web sites, speed to run applications, and permission to plug in devices. These network giants believe they should be able to charge Web site operators, application providers and device manufacturers for the right to use the ...
... middle of paper ...
... net neutrality.
5. Conclusion
Works Cited
Franken, Al. "Net Neutrality Is The 'Free Speech Issue Of Our Time': US Senator." International Business Times. Progressive Change Campaign Committee, 7 May 2014. Web. 17 May 2014.
Karr, Timothy. "Free Speech in the 21st Century." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 09 May 2008. Web. 17 May 2014.
Leiner, Barry M., Vinton G. Cerf, David D. Clark, Robert E. Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Daniel C. Lynch, Jon Postel, Larry G. Roberts, and Stephen Wolff. "Brief History of the Internet." Brief History of the Internet. Internet Society, 2014. Web. 17 May 2014.
Liebling, A.J. "Do You Belong in Journalism?" The New Yorker. The New Yorker, 14 May 1960. Web. 17 May 2014.
Say, My. "How Internet Access Can Boost The Economy And Social Equality." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 25 Apr. 2014. Web. 17 May 2014
When we think of those skilled in the art of rhetoric, we often jump to those we know are trying to convince us of something, like politicians, salesmen, lawyers, etc. We do not always consider corporate CEOs part of that group though Netflix CEO, Reed Hastings, would have us believing another thing. On March 20th, 2014, Hastings published an article titled “Internet Tolls And The Case For Strong Net Neutrality” on Netflix’s official blog. Just under a month before the blog was posted, Netflix settled a deal paying Comcast, America’s largest cable and Internet service provider (ISP), for faster and more reliable service to Comcast’s subscribers (Cohen and Wyatt). These “internet tolls” go against the culture of net neutrality in America, which in its essence is when no piece of information is prioritized over another on broadband networks. Hastings took to their blog to advocate for net neutrality and against abusive ISPs. Whether he was conscious of his rhetorical finesse or not, he wrote quite convincingly thus turning this blog into an excellent rhetorical artifact. Reed Hastings’ blog post aims to convince American Internet consumers that strong net neutrality is important by appealing to their values of choice, frugality and empathy while simultaneously making ISPs seem ill intentioned and Netflix seem honorable.
On any given day in 2015, you would be hard-pressed to walk into a room at random in America without encountering a Smart Phone. There is hardly a library left that does not feature a quiet chorus of clicking keyboards from the laptops within. We are, in essence, permanently plugged in to the Great and Powerful Internet, and we rely on service providers (ISP’s) to provide us with this now-important resource. Lately, though, getting Internet is becoming less and less simple as folks debate the enforcement of Internet— or “net”— neutrality in the United States. There are a lot of inflated egos arguing back and forth on the subject, and the phrase “net neutrality” is becoming widely recognized amongst every day Internet users. But how many of these people actually get what is going on, here? What is net neutrality, and why are household net surfers and economists alike getting
The Internet came to be because of the user. Without the user, there is no World Wide Web. It is a set of links and words all created by a group of users, a forum or a community (Weinberger 96). The concept of net neutrality is the affirming concept behind the openness of the net (Vinton Cerf). Vinton Cerf stated, “The Internet was designed with no gatekeepers over new content or services. A lightweight but enforceable neutrality rule is needed to ensure that the Internet continues to thrive” (Vinton Cerf). Moreover, consumers would be protected under a monopolistic market due to network neutrality (Opposing Views). The Open Internet Coalition on Opposing Views.com state that in a perfect world there would be a variable amount of high-speed broadband competitors offering consumers plenty of choices. This would provide a market-based check on violations of Net Neutrality so consumers could pick a provider that respected the open concept. However, the world is imperfect and a mediator is needed to ensure networks remain open and the incentives to innovate and invest will continue to exist (Opposing Views). Lastly, there is an existence of fast and slow lanes without the implementation of network neutrality (Owen 7). This ...
Collins, Rebecca L., Marc N. Elliot, Sandra H. Berry, David E. Kanouse, Dale Kunkel, Sarah B. Hunter,
...Hallert, C., C. Grant, S. Grehn, C. Grannot, S. Hultent, G. Midhagens M. Strom, H. Svensson,
"Internet History Sourcebooks Project." Internet History Sourcebooks Project. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Nov. 2013. .
Net neutrality is an issue that has been brought up several times throughout the years but is currently resurfacing as Ajit Pai, chairman of the FCC, plans to have it repealed. Voting for this decision will take place on the 14th. Before delving too deeply into the topic, let's define net neutrality. It’s the principle that companies that connect consumers to the internet cannot block any content. They must make all content available at the same speed, meaning they can't slow the loading speed of one site over another, treating everything equally. If net neutrality is voted to be repealed, this will cause major issues for consumers in the months to come.
On June 12, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission adopted the Net Neutrality policy. This policy was put in place in order to protect the securities and freedoms of the general public’s use of the internet. This protective and freeing policy, however, has been taken away as of December 14, 2017. The repeal of Net Neutrality is potentially hurtful and constricting to a large majority of Americans and therefore should be overturned. The repeal of Net Neutrality must be overturned because the American people deserve a free and open internet that allows the thoughts of the people to be freely expressed, and for users to be able to stream content and information freely. Without the protection provided by Net Neutrality, Americans will not
Leiner, Barry. "Internet." Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. 30 Nov. 2013
Schmidt, E. E., & Cohen, J. (2014, March 11). The Future of Internet Freedom. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from
middle of paper ... ... Internet. The Internet. The Internet. 20 Nov. 2013.
Tamborini, Ron ; Eastin, Matthew S. ; Skalski, Paul ; Lachlan, Kenneth ; Fediuk, Thomas A. ;
Halsall, Paul. "Internet History Sourcebooks." Internet History Sourcebooks. N.p., Aug. 1997. Web. 31 Dec. 2012.
The history of the internet shows that the internet is not a new medium. The internet was initially created in the 1960's to as a way for the United States to stay connected in case of a nuclear fallout due to the possible consequences of the Cold War. F...
Boepple, Paul. "Internet." The New Book of Knowledge. 34th ed. 20 vols. Chicago: Grolier Inc., 2000.