Symbolic Interactionism: The Base Theory Of The Looking Glass Self, By Charles Cooley

1097 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Perspective of symbolic interactionism

Symbolic Interactionist Symbolic Interactionist, is a concept that borders on the fringes of sociology, speech and communications, and even human psychology. The term was first coined by Herbert Bulmer who did not invent the concept. The concept was created by his professor at the University of Chicago and renowned social phycologist George Herbert Mead. The basic premise of this concept is that the very root of being human is being social creatures and our connection to each other. It is in this light that we judge our actions and choices as either successful and appropriate. Another important aspect of this theory that differentiates humans from animals is our ability and almost autonomous goal oriented behavior. Lions don’t think to themselves, if I produce more food for the pack then I will be King one day, animals don’t think long term, they react and think about survival. Whereas humans think if I don’t finish high school, people will think less of me and it will be harder to earn a living in the future, whereas others think the same about collage leading them to devote the actions and money to meet social standards that will allow them to live a life that meets a different …show more content…

The looking glass theory states that from a very young age we develop our self-worth and our perceived place in life. This is because we are a social species and that needs others to evaluate our progress as a human and to thrive to our full potential. It is this basic concept that ties the two theory’s, we are constantly defining and redefining our status and situation in life. We use others opinions and reactions to our thoughts and actions to determine if those behaviors or ideas are acceptable in cultural terms, and what classification of people our words and actions place us

Show More
Related

  • Augusta Comte And Merton's Functional Theory

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    George Mead and Charles Cooley developed symbolic interaction and believed that symbols are in everyday life. Symbolic interaction is the human action and interaction are comprehensible through the exchange of communication or symbols. Humans are represented by acting and social interaction. Symbols are anything that can be specified, referred, or pointed to. For example, a friend, book, or language. Language gives people a way to negotiate meaning through symbols. People identify meaning in speech and acts with others. Symbolic interaction examines that people use symbols, and interpret the meanings of those actions and symbols for themselves and for

    Read More

  • Phoebe's Trauma In Catcher In The Rye

    1448 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most wonderful look in the world is the look a child gives when they have learned the endless possibilities life has to offer. Just as soon as a child seems to gain the mentality of the glass world, it just as quickly shatters by the realities of life. People come from all different paths in life, but it seems the basic experiences remain the same: happiness, love, friendship, grief, heartbreak, and tragedy. Most people have experienced happiness, perhaps in the laugh of a baby just as most people have experienced tragedy with the loss of a loved one. Though tragedy does not walk alone in its path, it joins trauma, and together they live forever breaking glass worlds. It seems as if trauma comes down on glass worlds like a weight that cannot

    Read More

  • George Herbert Mead's Symbolic Interaction Theory

    725 Words  | 2 Pages

    George Herbert Mead’s perspective of symbolic interaction theory “relies on the symbolic meaning that people develop and rely upon in the process of social interaction. It analyzes society by addressing the subjective meanings that people impose on objects, events, and behaviors.” I have applied Mead’s theory to an opportunity I was given a couple weeks ago, to tour the San Luis Obispo County Jail. Prior to the tour, a jail was merely a strange concept to me; something I had seen in movies and television shows. It was something that I had never given much thought to, because I had just accepted it for how it was. The tour provided me with a lot of insight into how a jail is run, along with how much work and organization it takes to keep it

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionalist Perspective

    638 Words  | 2 Pages

    Symbolic interactionist’s like to understand the world through understanding the specific meanings and causes that society attributes to particular events. When analyzing health and illness symbolic interactionist’s like to look at individuals or groups and how they give meaning to their particular illness. Then they take that information and see how it affects their relationships with others and how it makes them view themselves. The symbolic interactionist theory also claims that we socially construct health and illness much like we do with race.  For instance if someone spends his days staring at the sun and goes blind people blame him for staring at the sun. They believe that if they do not engage in sun staring then they will not go blind. The same reasoning usually follows people who get lung cancer or AIDS. The person is blamed for having the illness regardless of how they got it; people assume the sick brought it upon themselves.

    Read More

  • The Three Paradigms In Society

    826 Words  | 2 Pages

    are the three major paradigms that function in today’s society. Functionalist, and conflict paradigms are macro-sociological paradigms. Symbolic interaction is a micro-sociological paradigm. Functionalist paradigm focuses on the integration of society, while social conflict focuses on the issue of division among society. Symbolic interaction works on communication and social change as a consequence. The three paradigms are completely different from each other in a social point of view. The macro-sociological paradigms view America as an inequality state. The social conflict paradigm fits today’s society.

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Social Exchange Theory and the Symbolic Interaction Theory

    1971 Words  | 4 Pages

    McCall. (2006). Symbolic interaction theory. In P. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary Social Psychological Theories (pp. 1-12). Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=7M82yReFf4sC&dq=social exchange and rational choice theory definition

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism Theory Of Gay Marriage

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    The main points of the Symbolic Interactionism perspective is that symbols are what shape how we communicate and how we view the world. Our changing ideas affect how we understand and view different things around us. Without symbols society would be not be very coordinated, people wouldn’t be able to specify a specific time for school or where to meet for lunch. The main points of the Functional Analysis perspective, is that society is made up of several individual parts that work together for society to function properly. Each of these smaller parts has functions that are beneficial consequences of people actions and dysfunctions that are harmful and threaten the equilibrium. In this perspective the smaller parts are look at to see how they

    Read More

  • The Fated High School Struggle

    946 Words  | 2 Pages

    Isaksen, Joachim. "The Looking Glass Self: How Our Self-image Is Shaped by Society." Popular Social Science. N.p., 27 May 2013. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism: The Causes Of Homelessness In Today's Society

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    Symbolic interactionism perspective is defined as “the study of how people negotiate the meanings of social life during their interactions with others” (Rohall, Milkie, and Lucas, 2014, p.27). It asserts that “we construct meaning about things that are important in our own lives and in our society” (Rohall, Milkie, and Lucas, 2014, p.28). These meanings derive from social interactions among individuals which

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism In The Blind Side By Michael Oher

    1353 Words  | 3 Pages

    In sociology symbolic interactionism explains the individual in a society and their interactions with others and through that it can explain social order and change. This theory was compiled from the teachings of George Herbert Mead in the early 20th century. Mead believed that the development of the individual was a social process. People are subjected to change based on their interactions with other people, objects or events and they assign meaning to things in order to decide how to act. This perspective depends on the symbolic meaning that people depend on in the process of social interaction. This paper will examine the movie “The Blind Side” through the symbolic interaction perspective.

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism Theory: Social Behaviors, Interaction, And Roles

    1081 Words  | 3 Pages

    Social norms are the rules of behavior that are acceptable within members of a society. They are acceptable expectations that must be followed by a group or society. Some social norms are flexible according to the environment or situation. These norms also vary within different cultures, social groups, and social classes. Interactions provide the social setting for appropriate behavior and is the basis for the social roles that individuals play as a member of a social group. As each social role is portrayed, a proper behavior must manifest to fit the expectations of that role. These basic terms of social norms, interactions, and roles are associated with the Symbolic Interactionism Theory, which focuses on the actions of an individual and the social interaction that individual contributes to. The framework of the theory is dependent upon the social interactions between individuals and the meaning that is given to their actions.

    Read More

  • Symbolic Interactionism Theory

    1032 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mead declared that our gift of language, our ability to manipulate and interpret abstract symbols, was what separated human beings from the other animals. I feel in a big way that Mead is correct. Humans understand and filter out information whether they intend to or not, all due to the channel of symbols. A symbol is a stimulus with meaning and value, it's an object whose meaning can be shared. Just think of all the symbols that stand universal throughout America, green light = go, heart = love, and red octagons = stop. What about the symbols that shine through our feelings, emotions and actions. A yawn usually means you're bored or tired. A smile is attached to happiness and laughter, symbols leak out naturally, and are read naturally as well. A newborn is nonsocial until it learns to be channeled through communication with the knowledge of symbols.

    Read More

  • George H. Mead And Cooley's Theory Of Symbolic Interactionism

    1074 Words  | 3 Pages

    Symbolic interactionism is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. This perspective has a long intellectual history, beginning with the German sociologist and economist, Max Weber and the American philosophers, George H. Mead and Charles Horton Cooley, all of which emphasized the subjective meaning of human behavior, the social process, and pragmatism. According to this theory, people inhabit a world that is in large part socially constructed. In particular, the meaning of objects, events, and behaviors comes from the interpretation people give them, and interpretations vary from one group to another. Cooley, in his theory of a "looking glass self," argued that the way we think about ourselves is particularly apt

    Read More

  • The Looking Glass Self, By Charles Cooley

    1382 Words  | 3 Pages

    The looking glass self is a concept by Charles Cooley that has three steps. The first step is how an individual imagines how they appear to others, secondly, they imagine what judgments people have of them based on their appearance, and the third is how they imagine what a person feels by the judgments that were made about them (Vogt Isaksen, 2012). Basically, individuals will conform to how they think others see them. For example, if a parent or family member constantly degrades a child, the child will start to believe that they are not worthy of anything and vice versa. George Mead believed in the study of “self” that a person will learn through social interactions (Keirns et al., 2015). Meads believed that this is a learned process and that children learn it through imitation. In doing this it will lead the way for an individual to be able to view the world from different perspectives and to help them become self-aware. Cooley and Mead’s theories believe that through socialization individuals will develop who they will become and what cultural beliefs they will

    Read More

  • Conformity

    843 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I am who I think others think I am”. Charles Horton Cooley created the looking glass self, stating that people grow from their perceptions of other people. There are three steps to his concept: imagining how we appear to others; are we funny or dull? What do people really think about me? The next step is imagining the judgment other people think of us; do they like us funny or dull? The third step is developing the self-concept or feeling about the situation. Dramaturgy is when you feel like your life is a drama or play. In this, we have an idea of what how we want others to think of us as. We put on a performance or a presentation self to the people we want to think we are similar. Conformity is what we do every day; we are meant to go to wake up, go to school, then make dinner and go to bed. We go along with whatever group we feel we want to belong to or already belong to. The true definition is “behavior in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards”. Conformity could be even

    Read More

More about Symbolic Interactionism: The Base Theory Of The Looking Glass Self, By Charles Cooley

Open Document