The Role Of Women In Frankenstein

1184 Words3 Pages

Banerjee additionally argues against notions that Shelley isn’t solely concerned on the usurpation of woman’s creative power (Banerjee 1) because the male and female family of Frankenstein are equally destroyed by his creation. Rather than just pulling women up into man’s sphere of separation from nature, Banerjee suggests that Shelley wants to remove the dichotomy; “for the family to ensure the well-being of all members men need to commit to it as much as women.” (Banerjee 12). But I find that there are many instances when feminine does work to bring stability, even though it is divided into different spheres, instead the problem is that the entities are ill-defined in Victor’s own androgynous impulses. For example, Victor’s father and mother …show more content…

As Dickerson points out, the female characters are largely in the background of the story as “Ambiguous figures: present but absent” (Dickerson 80), which serves the concept of Frankenstein as a ghost story. Dickerson also considers the females as keepers and guardian angels of men, and therefore “the women in Frankenstein’s house are failed keepers” (86) because they are “Passive and tame, silent and silenced” (87) especially in their lack of rhetorical capabilities. But whereas Dickerson focuses on the contrast between Safie’s distinct voice at the center of the story compared to all the other female characters to conclude the importance of women empowerment, I consider the mystifying of the female and Victor’s subsequent ignoring of the domestic life as a failure of Victor’s character to recognize the feminine within himself, as though a ghost. He is the teller of his story and while he consistently imbues the Elizabeth with angelic traits, he also reveals a sense of possession over her, first when he takes the present of Elizabeth’s adoption literally as his “mine to protect, love, and cherish” (Shelley 36), and again when he wants to fulfil his oath to his creation so that he “might claim Elizabeth, and forget the past in my union with her.”(153). Victor sees …show more content…

When speaking about the natural philosophers that inspired him to uncover the mysteries of life, Victor talks about how little the philosopher knows, “He had partially unveiled the face of Nature, but her immortal lineaments were still a wonder and a mystery. He might dissect,” (Shelley 40). The depiction of nature as female and as something still not understood shows that Victor’s mission isn’t simply to create without the feminine, but to understand it. When Cross examines the creature’s learning of language, she makes the point that “the creature seeks language as a way of compensating for his appearance…however, the very language he learns determines not only the structures of his relationship, but his very identity, as the product of a specifically gendered and structured discourse.” (Cross 557). Here, Cross considers the creature to be symbolic of women in art, attempting to be included by learning the male dominated discourse, but never being accepted because of their inherent nature. However well the creature works as a symbol for the lack of feminine acceptance in academics, the creature is always identified as male, by Victor and the creature himself. Instead, if the creature is in some part a reflection of Victor himself, then Victor’s isolation, after his creation slays William, is self-imposed to prevent the acquisition of sympathy, by his fear of

Open Document