The Case Of Surrogacy

1810 Words4 Pages

Many couples in the world get married and intend to start a family together, however this is not always possible for some families. One option for those families is surrogacy. Surrogacy is defined as an agreement with two parties for an adult woman to bear a child conceived through assisted conception for intended parents. In the United States alone, approximately 6.7 million women were diagnosed with infertility. The first known case of surrogacy occurred in California in the mid 1970’s. In 2010, and approximately 7.4 million women ages 15-44 used infertility services. The success of surrogacy is dependent upon numerous factors. Surrogacy poses complications for both the “carrier” of the embryo and the “parents.” Many people may wonder what …show more content…

For example, in Pennsylvania a young woman named Jessica Bartholomew was paid $25,000 to be the surrogate mother of a child. The conceiving of the child would consist of father Lamar Sally’s sperm, a fourth unknown party’s ovum, and the gestation would be carried out in Bartholomew’s womb. On September 12, 2013 Bartholomew, Sally and wife, Sherri Shepherd signed a contract agreeing that Shepherd and Sally would be legal parents to the child that Bartholomew was set to carry. The contract stated that although Shepherd had no genetic connections with the child she would still assume the matronly duties and responsibilities once the child arrive. However, some complications occurred. During approximately the third trimester, Shepherd and Sally filed for divorce. In the midst of the divorce Shepherd decided she no longer wanted any sort of interaction with the child she once agreed to take care of. Shepherd stated “not my egg, not my baby,” she also claimed that she was tricked into signing the agreement and took the case to court. When the child was born August 5, 2014, surrogate mother, Jessica Bartholomew’s name was put on the birth certificate and the child was given to Sally who then registered for Medicaid in the state of California, but due to the fact that Bartholomew’s name was on the birth certificate as the non-custodial parent of the child the state required that she pay Sally child support. During the court case the judge ruled that Shepherd’s name was to be put on the birth certificate and she would take on the responsibilities of a mother. The ruling also stated that Shepherd was to reimburse Bartholomew for the child support she paid and may also have to pay back the state aid that was provided. Shepherd and Sally’s divorce has not yet been finalized. Sally threatened to sue Shepherd with child abandonment, and Shepherd offered to pay Sally $150,000, but

Open Document