A Summary Of The Lizzie Borden Trial

1245 Words3 Pages

June 5th, 1893 was the beginning of the State of Massachusetts v. Borden trail, also known as the Lizzie Borden trial, that famously examined if a woman could murder. The Borden household was comprised of Andrew Borden, the father, Abbey Borden, the stepmother, and the two sisters, Lizzie and Emma Borden. According to Douglas Linder, professor of law at the University of Missouri at Kansas City, Lizzie Borden “belonged to numerous clubs” and “was [an] active member in her church” (Linder “Biographies”). Lizzie was a leader in her community whom many respected and acknowledged so the thought of her committing such gruesome murders seemed unlikely. It was also known however that Andrew Borden, Lizzie’s father, was somewhat of a withholder of …show more content…

Professor Linder insists that the most important witness was Bridget Sullivan, the housemaid of the Borden’s as she described “that she had not witnessed, during her two years of service to the family, signs of the rumored ugly relationship between Lizzie and her stepmother” (Linder “Account”). Bashing any thought of hatred for a motive for the murders and left only an unclear ax head and timeline for the prosecution to argue on. As the trial wore on it became vague who would come out on top since the physical evidence against Lizzie was strong, but the defenses counters including motive and testimonies were strong as well. The novel Outlaws, Mobsters and Crooks states that Lizzie’s defense attorney, Andrew Jennings, made one final plea before the jury “To find her guilty, you must believe she is a fiend” and followed with “Gentlemen, does she look it?” (Outlaws “Lizzie”). This final cry must have had an influence on the final verdict, the jury thought the poor Lizzie Borden was harmless contrary to the evidence. The trial started out with a gruesome sight followed by some convincing evidence by the prosecution, but this was all cut down by the prosecution's failure to present a motive adding to the unbelievable thought that a women could …show more content…

Tensions were high in the courtroom and the verdict was announced; Lizzie Borden was not guilty. Reporters from the entire nation rambled on about the true justice of the verdict. Sources also indicate that the press churned out “prose declaiming Lizzie’s innocence, the evil intentions of the police and prosecutors, the weakness of their case and the nobility with which Borden bore her suffering” (Powers “Borden”). The absolute partisan opinion of the public was wrong however, the evidence was obvious against Borden but yet there was no conviction.This inequitable verdict was eventually expanded upon and questioned by modern professionals. Michael Martins, an orator and author of Parallel Lives: A Social History of Lizzie Borden and Fall River, stated that the trial itself was “badly bungled by the police and prosecution” (Booth “Vengeful”). Which may suggest an unfair or biased trail due unprofessional investigators and jurors which only lends itself to an unfair verdict. That, lead to questions about the utter accusations in the

Open Document