In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (SSR) Thomas Kuhn argued that
science fluctuated between sustained periods of normal science and periods of
chaotic reshuffling, called revolutionary science.
During periods of normal science the scientific community agree on a set of
foundational/basic beliefs called the paradigm (SSR, 10). The paradigm con-
tains four basic categories of knowledge, (i) firmly established symbolic laws
(e.g., f = ma), (ii) metaphysical world-views (e.g., that matter is composed of
atoms), (iii) values (e.g., that theories should be consistent, plausible, and sim-
ple), and (iv) methodological knowledge (often a tacit understanding of how to
solve scientific problems). This knowledge was, and is, a prerequisite to becom-
ing a scientist, which is why the paradigm is sometimes called a ‘disciplinary
matrix’ (1970, 182).
Research during periods of normal science is not ground-breaking (SSR, 35).
Instead, research is composed of (i) solving problems very similar to those that
have already been solved, or (ii) refining answers that have already been attained
(both SSR, 34). Frank Parajes (2004) describes the process as “mopping up”.
Kuhn uses the term puzzle-solving to refer to this type of work (SSR, 35-43).
The term ‘puzzle-solving’ alludes to jigsaw puzzles, Kuhn says that in scientific
puzzle-solving, as in jigsaw puzzle-solving, the solver can expect to find concrete
solutions (SSR, 38) by employing familiar, algorithmic rules (SSR, 38; Bird,
2004). This whole endeavour may seem facile, dull, and inane, but scientists
like the challenge and can make a reasonable salary (SSR, 38; Pajares, 2007).
Sometimes observations will appear that repudiate/question the paradigm’s
authorit...
... middle of paper ...
...l Disparity be-
tween Newtonian and Relativistic Mechanics. The British Journal for the
Philosophy of Science, 24 (3): pp. 270-276.
[9] Oberheim, Eric and Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 2009. The In-
commensurability of Scientific Theories in Stanford Encyclo-
pedia of Philosophy. Available on the World Wide Web at
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incommensurability/. [Accessed Novem-
ber 15th, 2009]
[10] O’Connor, J.J. and Robertson, E.F. 1996. Urbain Jean Joseph Le Ver-
rier in The MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive. Available on the
World Wide Web at http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/. [Accessed
on November 15th, 2009]
[11] Parajes, Frank. 2004. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Available
on the World Wide Web at http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Kuhn.html.
[Accessed on November 12th, 2009]
Who were the four key figures who contributed to disenchanting the view of the universe?
Thomas Kuhn, an American Philosopher of Science in the twentieth century, introduced the controversial idea of "paradigm shifts" in his 1962 book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." This essay will discuss paradigm shifts, scientific revolutions, mop up work, and other key topics that Kuhn writes about in "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in great detail. This essay will explain what Kuhn means by mop up work, by drawing on the broader view of paradigms that he presents and explaining how paradigms are born and develop such that they structure the activities of normal science in specific ways, and this essay will show how this kind of mop up work can, in certain circumstances, lead to a new paradigm instead of more normal science.
The scientific revolution was what introduced the way we think based on experimentation, observation and how we apply reasoning to the things we do scientifically. During the scientific revooution this way of thinking brought forward new kinds of thinkers otherwise know as enlgihtentment thinkers. These enlightenment thinkers brought there ideas forward, which helped lead the strive for there independence . this is what led to the beginning of the scientific revolution. The scientific revolution began around the mid 1700s and went all the way through the mid 1800s theses revolutions did not only stay in one place, this was happening globally in Europe, the americans and through out the latin American colonies. You might ask yourself what did they these revolutions have in common ? they all became infulanced by one another and was infinced by the enlightenment thinkers.
Begelman, D. A. (1968). Is Science Autonomous?. American Psychologist, 23, 70. Retrieved February 13, 2011, from http://journals.ohiolink.edu/ejc/article.cgi?issn=0003066x&issue=v23i0001&article=70_isa&search_term=%28title%3D%28is+science+autonomous%29%29
The Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment period were both a time of immense growth in scientific discovery and an increase in the secular view of the world. The Scientific Revolution would include the use of direct observation and experimentation, dependence on mathematical confirmation, and inventions to test new scientific discoveries (Kwak). The new discoveries of the Scientific Revolution led the growing number of literate middle class individuals in the Enlightenment period. This growth of enlightened individuals led to more intellectual and cultural attitudes that shaped modern history throughout the world (Fiero, 134). This paper will analyze the impact of the
The Scientific revolution in the 16th and 17th centuries changed the way that people views the world. Scientific philosophers such as Galileo and Descartes threw out the old teachings of the church and challenged them with new ways of thinking. These men sought to prove that rational thought could prove the existence of God. They also challenged that it was an understanding of a series of rational thoughts, not faith, would bring understanding of how the world worked. Traditional ways of thinking were ultimately challenged by logical and sensible rationale.
Without theories, scientists’ experiments would yield no significance to the world. Theories are the core of the scientific community; therefore figuring out how to determine which theory prevails amongst the rest is an imperative matter. Kuhn was one of the many bold scientists to attempt to bring forth an explanation for why one theory is accepted over another, as well as the process of how this occurs, known as the Scientific Revolution. Kuhn chooses to refer to a theory as a ‘paradigm’, which encompasses a wide range of definitions such as “a way of doing science in a specific field”, “claims about the world”, “methods of fathering/analyzing data”, “habits of scientific thought and action”, and “a way of seeing the world and interacting with it” (Smith, pg.76). However in this case, we’ll narrow paradigm to have a similar definition to that of a ‘theory’, which is a system of ideas used to explain something; it can also be deemed a model for the scientific community to follow. Kuhn’s explanation of a Scientific Revolution brings to light one major problem—the problem of incommensurability.
A.J. Ayer, Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn. "Science and Non science: Defining the Boundary." Part 1. Pages 6-19. [...]
In 1905, Albert Einstein wrote his paper on the special theory of relativity (Prosper). This theory has the reputation as being so exotic that few people can understand it. On the contrary, special relativity is simply a system of kinematics and dynamics, based on a set of postulates that is different from those of classical mec...
The revolution brought about many radical changes and ideas that helped to strengthen it and the scientists that helped to bring it about became significant persons in history. "The emergence of a scientific community is one of the distinguishing marks of the Scientific Revolution."2 It was this form of community that gave a foundation for open thinking and observing throughout the sixteenth century and through twenty-first century. It was the first revolution that had more of a dedication to the ongoing process of science than of a goal to achieve scientific knowledge.3
middle of paper ... ... Lindberg, David C. Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Eds. David C. Lindberg and Robert S. Westman.
Taylor, Frederick Winslow (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York, NY, US and London, UK: Harper & Brothers. Print. 8 Feb. 2014.
The expansion and endorsement of intellectualism by the many important forward thinking scientists created a desire for social revolution, which, in turn, created an atmosphere conducive to further intellectual study. The Scientific Revolution was, in essence, both a social and intellectual revolution. During the Scientific Revolution, scientists such as Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Francis Bacon, Rene Descartes, and Christiaan Huygens wrestled with questions concerning God, human intellectualism, and their scientific views of the universe, its purpose, and how it functions. Ultimately, the implications of these new scientific discoveries began to change the way people thought and behaved. People began to question the widely accepted and Roman Catholic Church endorsed Aristotelian views of the universe. This led to the questioning of the traditional views of the state and societal structure. The geocentric Ptolemaic model was no longer blindly accepted. The earth was now no longer easily explainable or thought to be the center of the universe. Beliefs that were hundreds of years old were now proven to be false.
Beginning with the scientific revolution in the fifteen hundreds, the Western world has become accustomed to accepting knowledge that is backed by the scientific method, a method that has been standardized worldwide for the most accurate results. This method allows people to believe that the results achieved from an experiment conducted using the scientific method have been properly and rigorously tested and must therefore be the closest to truth. This method also allows for replication of any experiment with the same results, which further solidifies the credibility and standing of natural science in the world. Another aspect that allows for the reliability on the natural sciences is the current paradigm boxes, which skew the truth to remove anomalies. This affects the outcome of experiments as the hypotheses will be molded to create results that fit the paradigm box.
Burton, D. (2011). The History of Mathematics: An Introduction. (Seventh Ed.) New York, NY. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.