Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
To what extent is the Human Resource function important to a business
To what extent is the Human Resource function important to a business
Strategy Formulation: Corporate Strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Over time the importance of the value of human resources (HR) to its firm has increased. The management of human resources went from being operational to strategic, which are the two levels of HR, and from reactive to proactive. The HR field may organize its thinking about the past, present, and future around the framework that results from the combination of both proactive and reactive HR. Operational HR activities generally refer to the routing, day-to-day delivery of HR basics. The strategic level of HR activity is more difficult to explain and involves five criteria:
• Long term-whether the activity would add value in the distant future as opposed to the near future.
• Comprehensive-whether the activity involves the entire organization or individual departments or parts.
• Planned-whether the activity is thought out before it is done or if it is done on the spur of the moment.
• Integrated-whether it would bring other separated activities together.
• High value added-whether it focuses on business, financial and market success of not.
The two approaches to the management of HR that would be discussed are strategically reactive and strategically proactive. Reactive human resource management waits for problems to happen before something is done about it, e.g. waits for someone to quit before even thinking of a replacement or training for that replacement. Whereas proactive human resource management anticipates needs or problems and attempts prevent them. Both strategically proactive and strategically reactive HR are used to add value to an organization. In his book Strategic Human Resource Management, Mello explained the terms strategically reactive and strategically proactive as:
Strategically reactive HR focuses on implementing the business strategy; that is, given a clearly formulated business strategy (e.g., growth, new product, innovation, cycle reduction, new market entry), how can HR help support is successful implementation? Such activities include identifying and developing the technical knowledge, tactical skills, and business culture that are consistent with the demands of the business strategy. They may also include facilitating change management and organizing HR into service centers. (Mello, Jeffery A., 2006, p. 238)
Strategically proactive HR focuses on creating future strategic alternatives. Such activities include creating a culture of innovation and creativity; identifying merger and acquisition possibilities and creating internal capabilities that continually track and align with the marketplace for products, markets and capital with their respective lead indicators. (Mello, Jeffery A., 2006, p. 238)
The process of what is strategy and how it should be developed can be outlined by two major models.
Lengnick-Hall M.L.; Lengnick-Hall, C.A.; Andrade, L.S.; Drake, B. 2009. “Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field.” Human Resource Management Review, 19, pp. 64-85.
" This global London-based mining and mineral company was severely impacted by the global recession in 2008. Such an impact forced unprecedented workforce reductions worldwide and decentralized HR management had to be brought in under a single umbrella to ensure an orderly and efficient system that would support the organization’s future productivity."( Case Study OneRedesigning HR HRMG 5000 - Student Simple). Human resources have a strategic significance if managed efficiently and productively. The company revamped and managed its HR functions in a manner so as to achieve the strategic goals of the
Ramlall, S., Welch, T., Walter, J., & Tomlinson, D. (2009). Strategic HRM at the Mayo Clinic: A case study. Journal of Human Resources Education, 3(3), 13-35. Retrieved from http://business.troy.edu/jhre/Articles/PDF/3-3/31.pdf
This paper will attempt to give a broad overview from the available literature within three areas. First, the paper will explore the historical relationships of HR and organizational strategy. Second, the paper will give an overview of current practices and trends. Lastly,...
Strategic HR planning is an important component of strategic HR management. It links HR management directly to the strategic plan of your organization. Most mid- to large sized organizations have a strategic plan that guides them in successfully meeting their missions. Organizations routinely complete financial plans to ensure they achieve organizational goals and while workforce plans are not as common, they are just as important.
In the past Human Resource (HR) professionals built staffing, compensation, training, and other programs and policies that focused on employees and kept companies legally compliant. The HR function tended to be positioned at the end of the business chain and often focused on carrying out activities rather than achieving results (Dunn, 2006). But in the last decade, HR professionals have worked to become business partners by aligning their work with business strategies. This is important because being strategic means having an impact on corporate goals and objectives. As a result, HR professionals have been spending more time with general managers and with their counterparts in sales, marketing, and manufacturing to ensure that HR work adds value to the organization and helps deliver business results.
HR resourcing involves attracting and keeps hold of high-quality people in a job while learning and developing is providing the atmosphere where the employees are encouraged to gain knowledge and advance their career. Employee development encompasses acquisition of behaviours and skills that improve an employee’s capability towards meeting changing job requirements and customer and client demands. HR managers gain added value from employees when they assists employees reach their goals, the beneficial actions resulting from designed programs and policies are considered to add value.
The field of human resources (HR) plays a critical role in the performance and success of organizations. As organizations have become increasingly more complex, the effective management of HR has become even more important. The traditional perception of HR as only an administrative office is no longer valid. Instead, contemporary HR is directly involved with the internal organizational structure, business operations, and variety of functions carried out by employees on a daily basis (Reed & Bogardus, 2012). HR functions impact the organization’s strategic planning, improvement processes, and goal achievement. Six core bodies of knowledge provide the foundation for all of these HR functions. These areas are: strategic management; workforce planning and employment; human resource development; total rewards; employee and labor relations; and risk management (Reed & Bogardus, 2012).
HR has to develop strong relationships with other departments and have a cohesive plan running to have any company do better down to the bottom line figures. For the most successful business, there needs to be cooperation between all parts of a company, HR most likely should facilitate this, and when it does, companies thrive. “By utilizing basic HR tools like business process redesign, organizational redesign, job redesign and competency model development, we were able to more effectively align our selling and support processes” (Hults, 2011). Basically, HR being involved in strategic planning efforts is a smart move. HR brings the business perspective while other departments (management, finance) are looking directly at numbers. HR knows people and how to enhance human capital and make the right personnel investments. When properly used, HR can have significant changes and positive results on and with a company due to its knowledge and existing capabilities. In order for HR to make significant contributions, as aforementioned, they need to be allowed to and be worked with by management to achieve common goals (Hults,
Data illustrated from Teo (2002) from the interviews conducted towards the HR department suggested that the corporate HR department of the specific organization interview was becoming a key source in the strategic management process. Evidence has continually suggested that HR departments in commercialized entities develop a greater role in the strategic aspects of people management. For example, performance based pay, combining performance management with corporate strategy and corporate bargaining activities will develop a greater role for the HR department as one of the strategic gain of an organization (Teo,
HR professionals with a strategic performance management competency are well positioned to facilitate the pace and extent of change in their organizations. According to SHRM, HR systems can be impediments or enablers of rapid organizational change, but HR professionals with this competency will at least understand the business case for HR.
I ensure that HR is involved in the development and implementation of business strategies. And I ensure that HR and business objectives are aligned in order to achieve the shared goals. In addition, I introduce and implement systems, policies, and processes designed to help employees and the business in reaching the strategic objectives effectively and efficiently. For instance, when Qatar announced that it will be hosting the world cup in 2022, numerous construction projects emerged to accommodate this event. And many were awarded to my company. Accordingly, the business strategy was to deliver the projects on time and with high quality. Thus, I designed an HR strategy which incorporates recruiting qualified employees and training existing ones. That is, I transformed the business goals into
Wright and McMahan defined Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) as "the pattern of planned human resource deployments and activities intended to enable an organization to achieve its goals" (1992:298). This field moves away from traditional personnel management' and heads toward the view that employees play an integral role in the development of an organization's competitive advantage and as such carefully planned HR initiatives should be implemented to increase their value to the firm. SHRM conceptualized with Walker's (1978) article, which highlighted the need for linkage between strategic planning and human resource planning. However, it originated with Devanna, Fombrum and Tichy's (1984) article which analyzed in great detail the link between business strategy and HR. The field of SHRM has enjoyed a remarkable ascendancy during the past two decades as both an academic literature and focus of management practice.
In the 1980’s, the birth of a new concept called ‘Human Resource Management’ was born. This trend comes after an intense period of Taylorisation, Fordism and now, McDonaldisation. HRM came to counter balance these trends and to consider the concept of the Man as a Man and not as a machine. For the last several decades, the interests of companies in "strategic management" have increased in a noteworthy way. This interest in strategic management has resulted in various organizational functions becoming more concerned with their role in the strategic management process. The Human Resource Management (HRM) field has sought to become integrated into the strategic management process through the development of a new discipline referred to as Strategic Resource Management (SHRM). In current literature, the difference between SHRM and HRM is often unclear because of the interconnections linking SHRM to HRM. However, the concepts are slightly different. Thus, we can ask, what is strategic human resource management? What are the main theories and how do they work? What do they take into account and how are they integrated? What are the links between SHRM and organization strategy? In order to answer to these questions, we will precisely define strategic human resource management, followed by a look at the different approaches built by theorists, and finally, we will see the limits between the models and their applications depending on the company’s environment. Discussion Strategic Human Resource Management: definition Strategic human resource management involves the military word ‘strategy’ which is defined by Child in 1972 as "a set of fundamental or critical choices about the ends and means of a business". To be simpler, a strategy is "a statement of what the organization wants to become, where it wants to go and, broadly, how it means to get there." Strategy involves three major key factors: competitive advantages (Porter, 1985; Barney, 1991), distinctive capabilities (Kay, 1999) and the strategic fit (Hofer & Schendel 1986). Strategies must be developed with a relevant purpose to sustain the organizational goals and aims. SHRM is one of the components of the organizational strategies used to sustain the business long-term. SHRM defined as: “all those activities affecting the behaviour of individuals in their efforts to formulate and implement the strategic needs of the business. (Schuler, 1992)” or as “the pattern of planned human resource deployments and activities intended to enable the firm to achieve its goals.
Changing Roles. Traditionally, HR has been an administrative position-processing paperwork, benefits, hiring and firing, and compensation. However, recently HRM has moved from a traditional to a strategic role, the emphasis is on catering to the needs of consumers and workers. Before, HR was seen as the enemy and employees believed that HR’s main purpose was to protect management. Now, the position requires HRM to be more people oriented and protect their human capitol, the staff. In addition, human resource management has to be business savvy and think of themselves as strategic partners in the 21st century.