Narrative Analysis Of Pamela

915 Words2 Pages

Pamela details the story of a young, servant girl whose dearest possession, her virtue, faces peril from a somewhat anonymous assailant. The title character’s journey is related to the reader using the epistolary format, and each letter or journal entry slowly pulls the reader into the story as the reader forgets that Pamela is not writing directly to him/her. This format allows the protagonist to seem as if she is appealing directly to the reader as she pleads for help and begs for prayers. And so, this personal, emotional appeal, which does not usually appear in a traditional first person narrative, seems to speak to the reader. The epistolary format creates a more personal and complex narrative perspective that causes the reader to blur …show more content…

Interestingly, the first line of Pamela’s first letter is paradoxical and seems to set the tone for the rest of the novel as she says that she has “…great trouble, and some comfort, to acquaint you with” (43). Just as Pamela struggles to identify if she is conveying good news or bad news, the reader struggles to decide if s/he is acting as observer or character. Furthermore, the use of the second person pronoun “you” here, and throughout Pamela’s letters, can be misconstrued to make the reader feel like the intended audience instead of her parents to whom the letter is actually addressed. Initially, Pamela’s letters are met with a reply from her parents, but as the novel progresses, the responses from her parents become noticeably absent. If the parents are not responding, then that leaves only the reader to respond, which further promotes the reader from observer to vested character. Because of the lacking correspondence from Pamela’s parents, the reader is left with only Pamela’s letters from which s/he can discern details to define Pamela and the other characters in the …show more content…

B highlights the difficulties that face the reader in an attempt to objectively define him. Pamela’s descriptions of her master swing from reverence to revolt and back again throughout the novel. Pamela’s initial description of Mr. B depicts an “angel,” “fine gentleman, and a “gracious benefactor” (53). Within a few letters, though, Pamela describes him as a “wicked, wicked man” for whom she has no patience (93). Eventually, Pamela’s emotions swing favorably as she finally admits to loving Mr. B. and agrees to marry him. The variations in Pamela’s descriptions of Mr. B result from a personal experience or encounter. The reader is never offered an objective account or a letter that, perhaps, depicts the same scene but from Mr. B.’s point of view. This forces the reader to have to use a great deal of inference and conjecture in order to try to understand the character of Mr. B., but as Pamela is the character begging the reader of her letters for sympathy and understanding, an objective opinion of Mr. B. is nearly impossible to establish. Since the reader cannot establish an unbiased opinion because s/he is lending sympathy to Pamela, just as she has asked for in her letters, then the reader must stop to question if s/he exists in an observatory role, or if the reader is now a character in the story who is casting judgment based on the one-sided opinion that the epistles have

Open Document